Yan Liu, Chenni Wang, Fang Liu
Anqing Medical School, Anqing, Anhui 246052, China.
Wuhu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China.
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022 May 18;2022:1288233. doi: 10.1155/2022/1288233. eCollection 2022.
In order to study the efficacy of TCM rehabilitation for lumbar disc herniation, it is suggested to compare the effects of hot compress, ordinary sandbag, or hot compress with traditional Chinese medicine. A total of 79 patients with Qi stagnation and blood stasis syndrome in a traditional Chinese medicine hospital who met the diagnostic criteria of LDH and the syndrome classification in the diagnostic efficacy criteria of traditional Chinese medicine were selected. The subjects were randomly divided into groups A, B, and C: group A (26 cases) was the sandbag hot compress dry pregroup and received the simple sandbag hot compress scheme; group B (26 cases) was a simple traditional Chinese medicine hot compress intervention group, which received traditional Chinese medicine hot compress scheme; group C (27 cases) was the intervention group of traditional Chinese medicine sandbag combined with hot compress and received the scheme of traditional Chinese medicine sandbag combined with hot compress. In addition to the different hot compress media used, other aspects remained the same among the three groups. The treatment time of each hot compress was 40 min, twice a day for 2 weeks. A total of 14 cases fell out during the intervention process, and 65 subjects completed the intervention process. The experiment showed that there was no significant difference among the three groups ( > 0.05). The test results were confirmed.
为研究中医康复治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效，建议比较热敷、普通沙袋或中药热敷的效果。选取某中医院79例符合腰椎间盘突出症诊断标准及中医诊断疗效标准中气滞血瘀证型分类的患者。将受试者随机分为A、B、C组：A组（26例）为沙袋热敷干预组，采用单纯沙袋热敷方案；B组（26例）为单纯中药热敷干预组，采用中药热敷方案；C组（27例）为中药沙袋联合热敷干预组，采用中药沙袋联合热敷方案。三组除使用的热敷介质不同外，其他方面均相同。每次热敷时间为40分钟，每天2次，共2周。干预过程中共有14例脱落，65例受试者完成干预过程。实验表明三组间差异无统计学意义（>0.05）。检验结果得到证实。
