Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201800, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Sep;23(9):e13656. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13656. Epub 2022 May 30.
To quantify the influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose.
Nine reference cubic targets and corresponding plans with modulation widths (M) of 3, 6, and 9 cm and with center depths (CDs) of 6, 12, and 24 cm were generated by the treatment planning system (TPS). The Monte Carlo code FLUKA was used for simulating the dose distribution from the aforementioned original plans and the dose perturbation by varying ±5%, ±15%, ±20%, ±25%, and ±40% in spot full width half maximum to the X-direction while keeping consistent in the Y-direction. The dosimetric comparisons in dose deviation, γ-index analysis, lateral penumbra, and flatness were evaluated.
The largest 3D absolute mean deviation was 15.0% ± 20.9% (mean ± standard deviation) in M3CD6, whereas with the variation from -15% to +20%, the values were below 5% for all cube plans. The lowest 2D γ-index passing rate was 80.6% with criteria of 2%-2 mm by a +40% variation in M3CD6. For the M9CD24 with a -40% variation, the maximum 1D dose deviations were 5.6% and 15.7% in the high-dose region and the edge of the radiation field, respectively. The maximum deviations of penumbra and flatness were 3.4 mm and 11.4%, respectively.
The scenario of beam optics asymmetric showed relatively slight influence on the global dose distribution but severely affected dose on the edge of the radiation field. For scanning carbon-ion therapy facilities, beam spot lateral profile settings in TPS base data should be properly handled when beam optics asymmetry variation is over 15%.
定量分析射束光学非对称性分布对剂量的影响。
利用治疗计划系统(TPS)生成 9 个调制宽度(M)分别为 3、6 和 9cm,中心深度(CD)分别为 6、12 和 24cm 的参考立方靶区及其相应计划。采用蒙特卡罗程序 FLUKA 模拟原始计划的剂量分布,并通过在 X 方向上改变束斑全宽半高值±5%、±15%、±20%、±25%和±40%,同时在 Y 方向保持一致,来模拟剂量变化。评估剂量偏差、γ 指数分析、侧向半影和平坦度等方面的剂量学比较。
M3CD6 的 3D 绝对平均剂量偏差最大为 15.0%±20.9%(平均值±标准差),而在-15%至+20%的变化范围内,所有立方靶区计划的偏差值均低于 5%。在 M3CD6 变化+40%的情况下,2Dγ指数通过率最低为 80.6%,标准为 2%-2mm。对于 M9CD24 变化-40%的情况,高剂量区和辐射场边缘的最大 1D 剂量偏差分别为 5.6%和 15.7%。半影和平坦度的最大偏差分别为 3.4mm 和 11.4%。
射束光学非对称性对整体剂量分布的影响相对较小,但严重影响辐射场边缘的剂量。对于扫描碳离子治疗设备,当射束光学非对称性变化超过 15%时,TPS 基础数据中束斑横向轮廓的设置应适当处理。