Tessonnier T, Mairani A, Brons S, Sala P, Cerutti F, Ferrari A, Haberer T, Debus J, Parodi K
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Aug 1;62(16):6784-6803. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7b12.
In the field of particle therapy helium ion beams could offer an alternative for radiotherapy treatments, owing to their interesting physical and biological properties intermediate between protons and carbon ions. We present in this work the comparisons and validations of the Monte Carlo FLUKA code against in-depth dosimetric measurements acquired at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT). Depth dose distributions in water with and without ripple filter, lateral profiles at different depths in water and a spread-out Bragg peak were investigated. After experimentally-driven tuning of the less known initial beam characteristics in vacuum (beam lateral size and momentum spread) and simulation parameters (water ionization potential), comparisons of depth dose distributions were performed between simulations and measurements, which showed overall good agreement with range differences below 0.1 mm and dose-weighted average dose-differences below 2.3% throughout the entire energy range. Comparisons of lateral dose profiles showed differences in full-width-half-maximum lower than 0.7 mm. Measurements of the spread-out Bragg peak indicated differences with simulations below 1% in the high dose regions and 3% in all other regions, with a range difference less than 0.5 mm. Despite the promising results, some discrepancies between simulations and measurements were observed, particularly at high energies. These differences were attributed to an underestimation of dose contributions from secondary particles at large angles, as seen in a triple Gaussian parametrization of the lateral profiles along the depth. However, the results allowed us to validate FLUKA simulations against measurements, confirming its suitability for He ion beam modeling in preparation of clinical establishment at HIT. Future activities building on this work will include treatment plan comparisons using validated biological models between proton and helium ions, either within a Monte Carlo treatment planning engine based on the same FLUKA code, or an independent analytical planning system fed with a validated database of inputs calculated with FLUKA.
在粒子治疗领域,由于氦离子束具有介于质子和碳离子之间的有趣物理和生物学特性,它可为放射治疗提供一种替代方案。在这项工作中,我们将蒙特卡罗FLUKA代码与在海德堡离子束治疗中心(HIT)进行的深度剂量测量进行了比较和验证。研究了有无波纹滤过器时水中的深度剂量分布、水中不同深度处的横向剂量分布以及扩展布拉格峰。在通过实验对真空中较不为人知的初始束流特性(束流横向尺寸和动量展宽)和模拟参数(水的电离势)进行调整之后,对模拟和测量得到的深度剂量分布进行了比较,结果表明在整个能量范围内,射程差异低于0.1毫米,剂量加权平均剂量差异低于2.3%,总体吻合良好。横向剂量分布的比较显示,半高宽差异低于0.7毫米。扩展布拉格峰的测量表明,在高剂量区域,模拟与测量的差异低于1%,在所有其他区域低于3%,射程差异小于0.5毫米。尽管取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但仍观察到模拟与测量之间存在一些差异,尤其是在高能量时。这些差异归因于大角度次级粒子剂量贡献的低估,这在沿深度的横向分布的三重高斯参数化中可见。然而,这些结果使我们能够针对测量结果验证FLUKA模拟,证实了其在HIT临床设施准备中用于氦离子束建模的适用性。基于这项工作的未来活动将包括在基于相同FLUKA代码的蒙特卡罗治疗计划引擎内,或在由用FLUKA计算的经过验证的输入数据库提供数据的独立分析计划系统内,使用经过验证的生物学模型对质子和氦离子之间的治疗计划进行比较。