Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 30;24(5):e32922. doi: 10.2196/32922.
Considered a facet of behavioral impulsivity, response inhibition facilitates adaptive and goal-directed behavior. It is often assessed using the Stop-Signal Task (SST), which is presented on stand-alone computers under controlled laboratory conditions. Sample size may consequently be a function of cost or time and sample diversity constrained to those willing or able to attend the laboratory. Statistical power and generalizability of results might, in turn, be impacted. Such limitations may potentially be overcome via the implementation of web-based testing.
The aim of this study was to investigate if there were differences between variables derived from a web-based SST when it was undertaken independently-that is, outside the laboratory, on any computer, and in the absence of researchers-versus when it was performed under laboratory conditions.
We programmed a web-based SST in HTML and JavaScript and employed a counterbalanced design. A total of 166 individuals (mean age 19.72, SD 1.85, range 18-36 years; 146/166, 88% female) were recruited. Of them, 79 undertook the independent task prior to visiting the laboratory and 78 completed the independent task following their laboratory visit. The average time between SST testing was 3.72 (SD 2.86) days. Dependent samples and Bayesian paired samples t tests were used to examine differences between laboratory-based and independent SST variables. Correlational analyses were conducted on stop-signal reaction times (SSRT).
After exclusions, 123 participants (mean age 19.73, SD 1.97 years) completed the SST both in the laboratory and independently. While participants were less accurate on go trials and exhibited reduced inhibitory control when undertaking the independent-compared to the laboratory-based-SST, there was a positive association between the SSRT of each condition (r=.48; P<.001; 95% CI 0.33-0.61).
Findings suggest a web-based SST, which participants undertake on any computer, at any location, and in the absence of the researcher, is a suitable measure of response inhibition.
反应抑制被认为是行为冲动的一个方面,它有助于适应性和目标导向的行为。它通常使用停止信号任务(SST)进行评估,该任务在独立的计算机上在受控的实验室条件下呈现。样本量可能因此取决于成本或时间,并且样本多样性受到愿意或能够参加实验室的人的限制。统计效力和结果的普遍性可能会受到影响。通过实施基于网络的测试,这些限制可能会得到克服。
本研究旨在调查当 SST 在独立于实验室的情况下进行时,即在任何计算机上并且没有研究人员的情况下,与在实验室条件下进行时相比,从基于网络的 SST 中得出的变量是否存在差异。
我们使用 HTML 和 JavaScript 编写了一个基于网络的 SST,并采用了平衡设计。共有 166 人(平均年龄 19.72,SD 1.85,范围 18-36 岁;146/166,88%为女性)被招募。其中,79 人在访问实验室之前独立完成了任务,78 人在实验室访问后完成了独立任务。两次 SST 测试之间的平均时间为 3.72(SD 2.86)天。使用独立样本和贝叶斯配对样本 t 检验来检查基于实验室和独立 SST 变量之间的差异。对停止信号反应时间(SSRT)进行了相关分析。
排除后,123 名参与者(平均年龄 19.73,SD 1.97 岁)在实验室和独立条件下都完成了 SST。虽然参与者在进行独立比较实验室基于 SST 时,在 Go 试验中的准确性较低,并且表现出抑制控制能力下降,但每个条件的 SSRT 之间存在正相关(r=.48;P<.001;95%CI 0.33-0.61)。
研究结果表明,参与者可以在任何计算机上、任何地点、没有研究人员的情况下进行基于网络的 SST,是反应抑制的一种合适的测量方法。