Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia; Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia.
Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jul;305:115046. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115046. Epub 2022 May 25.
Quality of life is an important person-centred outcome in health and aged care settings. Due to an increasing prevalence of cognitive decline and dementia in ageing populations, a proportion of older people receiving health and aged care services may not be able to reliably assess their own quality of life, highlighting the need for proxy assessment. This systematic review sought to investigate the level of agreement between self and proxy-report of older people's quality of life using established preference-based instruments of quality of life suitable for economic evaluation.
A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Eight databases were searched: Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Econlit, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Ageline and Cochrane Library. Information was extracted on the instruments, population samples (including any cognitive thresholds applied), mean scores, type of proxy, and measures of inter-rater agreement.
A total of 50 studies using eight different preference-based quality of life instruments were identified. Most studies were cross-sectional (72%) with a wide variety of cognitive assessments and thresholds applied to define older participants with cognitive impairment. The most common proxies were family members, mostly spouses. The level of agreement between self and proxy-report was generally poor - irrespective of the instrument applied or type of proxy - with proxy-report generally indicating lower levels of quality of life than self-report. There was some evidence of stronger agreement on more observable quality of life domains e.g., physical health and mobility, relative to less observable domains e.g. emotional well-being. Few studies tracked self and/or proxy-report of quality of life longitudinally.
More research is needed to develop evidence to inform guidance on self-report versus proxy-report of quality of life for older people receiving health and aged care services. Until then, the collection of both self and proxy reports as complementary measures is indicated.
生活质量是健康和老年护理环境中重要的以人为本的结果。由于人口老龄化中认知能力下降和痴呆症的患病率不断增加,接受健康和老年护理服务的一部分老年人可能无法可靠地评估自己的生活质量,这凸显了需要进行代理评估。本系统评价旨在调查使用适合经济评估的既定基于偏好的生活质量工具,自我报告和代理报告老年人生活质量之间的一致性程度。
按照 PRISMA 指南进行系统评价。共搜索了 8 个数据库:Web of Science、Scopus、Medline、Econlit、PsychINFO、CINAHL、Ageline 和 Cochrane Library。提取了有关工具、人群样本(包括应用的任何认知阈值)、平均分数、代理类型和内部评分者一致性衡量标准的信息。
共确定了 50 项使用 8 种不同基于偏好的生活质量工具的研究。大多数研究是横断面研究(72%),对认知评估和应用的认知障碍定义标准进行了广泛的研究。最常见的代理是家庭成员,大多数是配偶。自我报告和代理报告之间的一致性程度通常较差-无论应用的工具或代理类型如何-代理报告通常表明生活质量水平低于自我报告。在更可观察的生活质量领域(例如,身体健康和行动能力),相对于较不可观察的领域(例如,情绪健康),有一些证据表明代理报告与自我报告之间的一致性更强。很少有研究对生活质量的自我和/或代理报告进行纵向跟踪。
需要进行更多的研究,以提供有关健康和老年护理服务人群自我报告与代理报告生活质量的指导意见的证据。在那之前,建议收集自我和代理报告作为补充措施。