Aier Eye Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430050, China.
Aier Eye Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430050, China.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022 Sep;39:102931. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102931. Epub 2022 May 27.
To evaluate the efficacy of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) treatment for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).
PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were comprehensively searched for studies published up to April 19, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective and prospective cohort studies that compared SML with any other intervention for chronic CSC were selected. The primary outcomes were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Random-effect model was used for pooled analysis.
Eleven studies including 834 eyes were included, with 428 eyes undergoing SML treatment and 406 eyes receiving other interventions. Pooled results showed no significant differences between SML and control with respect to BCVA, CMT, or complete resolution of subretinal fluid, while SML treatment was inferior to control in terms of subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) reduction [weighted mean difference (WMD)=44.75, 95% Cl, 14.31-75.20, P<0.05, I=72%]. However, SML was not superior to photodynamic therapy with respect to SFCT (WMD=61.29, 95% Cl, 29.50-93.08, P<0.05, I=56%), retinal sensitivity (WMD=-1.85, 95% Cl, -3.05--0.65, P<0.01, I=0) or NEI-VFQ25 score (WMD=-2.44, 95% Cl, -4.72--0.16, P<0.05, I=0). No serious side effects of SML treatment were observed.
Available evidence suggests that the clinical efficacy of SML therapy is similar to other treatment modalities for chronic CSC. However, because of the lack of serious side effects, SML may be the most promising alternative therapy for chronic CSC. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021 258837).
评估亚阈值微脉冲激光(SML)治疗慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSC)的疗效。
系统检索PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase 数据库,检索时限均截至 2021 年 4 月 19 日,收集比较 SML 与其他任何干预措施治疗慢性 CSC 的随机对照试验(RCT)、回顾性和前瞻性队列研究。主要结局指标为最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中心黄斑厚度(CMT)。采用 Review Manager 5.3 软件进行 Meta 分析,采用随机效应模型进行合并分析。
共纳入 11 项研究,包括 834 只眼,其中 428 只眼接受 SML 治疗,406 只眼接受其他干预。合并结果显示,SML 组与对照组在 BCVA、CMT 或视网膜下液完全吸收方面差异均无统计学意义,而 SML 组在黄斑中心凹下脉络膜厚度(SFCT)降低方面劣于对照组[加权均数差(WMD)=44.75,95%可信区间(CI):14.31~75.20,P<0.05,I²=72%]。然而,SML 并不优于光动力疗法在 SFCT(WMD=61.29,95%CI:29.50~93.08,P<0.05,I²=56%)、视网膜敏感度(WMD=-1.85,95%CI:-3.05~-0.65,P<0.01,I²=0)或 NEI-VFQ25 评分(WMD=-2.44,95%CI:-4.72~-0.16,P<0.05,I²=0)方面的疗效。未观察到 SML 治疗的严重不良反应。
现有证据表明,SML 治疗慢性 CSC 的临床疗效与其他治疗方法相似。然而,由于缺乏严重的不良反应,SML 可能是治疗慢性 CSC 最有前途的替代疗法。研究方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD4202125837)注册。