Veenstra Frouwke, Verhoef Lise M, Opdam Merel, den Broeder Alfons A, Kwok Wing-Yee, Meek Inger L, van den Ende Cornelia H M, Flendrie Marcel, van Herwaarden Noortje
Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, Ubbergen, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
BMC Rheumatol. 2022 May 31;6(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00261-3.
Gout and diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM) frequently co-exist. The pharmacological effects of metformin may include anti-inflammatory and urate lowering effects. The objective of this study was to test these effects in patients with gout starting uric acid lowering treatment (ULT) in secondary care.
Retrospective cohort study including patients with gout and DM starting ULT. Differences in the incidence density of gout flares, proportion of patients reaching target sUA in the first six months after starting ULT, and difference in mean allopurinol dose at sUA target were compared between users of metformin and users of other or no anti-diabetic drugs (control group). Correction for confounding was applied.
A total of 307 patients were included, of whom 160 (52.1%) used metformin. The incidence of flares was 1.61 and 1.70 in the first six months for respectively the metformin group and control group. The incidence rate ratio for gout flares was not significant (0.95, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.14). At six months, 62.8% and 54.9% reached target sUA in the metformin and control group respectively, corrected odds ratio of 1.09 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.80). There was no difference in mean allopurinol dose at sUA target 266 mg for metformin users and 236 mg for the control group, difference 30 mg (95% CI - 4.7 to 65.5).
In conclusion we could not confirm a clinically relevant anti-inflammatory or urate lowering effect of metformin in patients starting ULT treatment and receiving usual care flare prophylaxis.
痛风与2型糖尿病(DM)常并存。二甲双胍的药理作用可能包括抗炎和降尿酸作用。本研究的目的是在二级医疗保健中对开始降尿酸治疗(ULT)的痛风患者测试这些作用。
回顾性队列研究,纳入开始ULT的痛风和DM患者。比较二甲双胍使用者与其他或未使用抗糖尿病药物者(对照组)在痛风发作的发病密度、开始ULT后前六个月达到目标血清尿酸(sUA)的患者比例以及达到sUA目标时别嘌醇平均剂量的差异。对混杂因素进行校正。
共纳入307例患者,其中160例(52.1%)使用二甲双胍。二甲双胍组和对照组在前六个月的发作发生率分别为1.61和1.70。痛风发作的发病率比无统计学意义(0.95,95%CI 0.78至1.14)。六个月时,二甲双胍组和对照组分别有62.8%和54.9%达到目标sUA,校正比值比为1.09(95%CI 0.66至1.80)。达到sUA目标266mg时,二甲双胍使用者的别嘌醇平均剂量与对照组的236mg无差异,差值为30mg(95%CI -4.7至65.5)。
总之,我们无法证实在开始ULT治疗并接受常规痛风发作预防护理的患者中,二甲双胍具有临床相关的抗炎或降尿酸作用。