Suppr超能文献

金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症临床试验中的异质性使研究结果的解释变得复杂。

Heterogeneity in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia Clinical Trials Complicates Interpretation of Findings.

机构信息

University of Edinburgh Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Regional Infectious Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 4;226(4):723-728. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac219.

Abstract

We systematically evaluated randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). There was intertrial heterogeneity in cohort characteristics, including bacteremia source, complicated SAB, and comorbidities. Reporting of cohort characteristics was itself variable, including bacteremia source and illness severity. Selection bias was introduced by exclusion criteria relating to comorbidities, illness severity, infection types, and source control. Mortality was lower in RCT control arms compared with observational cohorts. Differences in outcome definitions impedes meta-analysis. These issues complicate the interpretation and application of SAB RCT results. The value of these trials should be maximized by a standardized approach to recruitment, definitions, and reporting.

摘要

我们系统地评估了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症(SAB)的随机对照试验(RCT)。队列特征存在试验间异质性,包括菌血症源、复杂 SAB 和合并症。队列特征的报告本身也存在差异,包括菌血症源和疾病严重程度。排除标准与合并症、疾病严重程度、感染类型和源头控制有关,这引入了选择偏倚。与观察队列相比,RCT 对照组的死亡率较低。结局定义的差异妨碍了荟萃分析。这些问题使 SAB RCT 结果的解释和应用变得复杂。通过标准化的招募、定义和报告方法,可以最大限度地提高这些试验的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e27a/9441204/12b4b06c46d3/jiac219f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验