Department of Behavioral Sciences, Karakoram International University, Gilgit, Pakistan.
Department of Psychology, and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2022 Jun 1;210(6):439-445. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001515. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
The purpose of the current study was to examine the latent structure and cross-cultural measurement validity of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms assessed by the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5. Participants comprised trauma-exposed Chinese and Pakistani undergraduate students (N = 495 and N = 186, respectively). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that a seven-factor hybrid model involving intrusion, avoidance, negative affect, anhedonia, externalizing behaviors, anxious arousal, and dysphoric arousal factors provided good fit in both samples. This model fit significantly better than three alternative models including the DSM-5 four-factor model and six-factor anhedonia and externalizing behaviors models. The subsequent multigroup CFA showed that the best-fitting hybrid model demonstrated cross-cultural measurement invariance. Our findings provide further empirical support for the seven-factor PTSD hybrid model and its cross-cultural invariance, and have implications for understanding and application of DSM-5's PTSD symptoms.
本研究旨在考察《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 5 版(DSM-5)创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状检查表评估的 PTSD 症状的潜在结构和跨文化测量效度。参与者包括经历过创伤的中国和巴基斯坦本科生(分别为 N=495 和 N=186)。验证性因子分析(CFA)表明,在两个样本中,一个包含闯入、回避、负性情绪、快感缺失、外化行为、焦虑觉醒和烦躁觉醒因素的七因素混合模型提供了良好的拟合度。该模型的拟合度明显优于三个替代模型,包括 DSM-5 四因素模型和六因素快感缺失和外化行为模型。随后的多组 CFA 表明,最佳拟合的混合模型表现出跨文化测量不变性。我们的研究结果为七因素 PTSD 混合模型及其跨文化不变性提供了进一步的实证支持,并对理解和应用 DSM-5 的 PTSD 症状具有启示意义。