• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍症状在创伤暴露青少年中的因子结构:考察时间上的稳定性。

Factor structure of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms in trauma-exposed adolescents: Examining stability across time.

机构信息

Laboratory for Traumatic Stress Studies, CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Laboratory for Traumatic Stress Studies, CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2017 Dec;52:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.07.001
PMID:28774745
Abstract

This study investigated the latent structure of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms using two-wave longitudinal data collected from a sample of adolescents exposed to an explosion accident. Two waves of surveys were conducted approximately 3 and 8 months after the accident, respectively. A total of 836 students completed the baseline survey, and 762 students completed the follow-up survey. The results of confirmatory factor analyses(CFA) indicated that a seven-factor hybrid model composed of intrusion, avoidance, negative affect, anhedonia, externalizing behaviors, anxious arousal and dysphoric arousal factors yielded significantly better data fit at both waves than the other models including the DSM-5 four-factor model, the six-factor anhedonia and externalizing behaviors models. Furthermore, the results of CFA invariance tests supported the longitudinal invariance of the model. Implications and limitations in terms of these results are discussed.

摘要

本研究使用两波纵向数据,对经历爆炸事故的青少年样本中的 DSM-5 PTSD 症状的潜在结构进行了研究。两波调查分别在事故发生后大约 3 个月和 8 个月进行。共有 836 名学生完成了基线调查,762 名学生完成了随访调查。验证性因素分析(CFA)的结果表明,在两个时间点上,由侵入、回避、负性情绪、快感缺失、外化行为、焦虑唤醒和烦躁唤醒七个因素组成的混合模型均优于其他模型,包括 DSM-5 四因素模型、六因素快感缺失和外化行为模型。此外,CFA 不变性检验结果支持模型的纵向不变性。讨论了这些结果的意义和局限性。

相似文献

1
Factor structure of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms in trauma-exposed adolescents: Examining stability across time.DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍症状在创伤暴露青少年中的因子结构:考察时间上的稳定性。
J Anxiety Disord. 2017 Dec;52:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
2
Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress symptoms: support for a hybrid Anhedonia and Externalizing Behaviors model.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激症状的维度结构:对快感缺失与外化行为混合模型的支持
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Feb;61:106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
3
DSM-5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms in Nonclinical Samples of Chinese and Pakistani Trauma-Exposed Adults: Factor Structure and Invariance Across Culture.DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍症状在中、巴两国非临床创伤暴露成年人样本中的表现:跨文化的因子结构和不变性。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2022 Jun 1;210(6):439-445. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001515. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
4
Assessing the underlying dimensionality of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms in Chinese adolescents surviving the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake.评估 2008 年汶川地震后幸存的中国青少年 DSM-5 PTSD 症状的潜在维度。
J Anxiety Disord. 2015 Apr;31:90-7. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
5
Construct validation of the hybrid model of posttraumatic stress disorder: Distinctiveness of the new symptom clusters.创伤后应激障碍混合模型的建构效度:新症状群的独特性。
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 Mar;54:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 30.
6
Dimensionality of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder and its association with suicide attempts: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍的维度及其与自杀未遂的关联:来自酒精及相关疾病全国流行病学调查-III的结果
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;52(6):715-725. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1374-0. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
7
Examination of the latent structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in Slovakia.探讨斯洛伐克《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版创伤后应激障碍症状的潜在结构。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Sep;267:232-239. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.028. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
8
PTSD's Underlying Dimensions in Typhoon Haiyan Survivors: Assessing DSM-5 Symptomatology-Based PTSD Models and Their Relation to Posttraumatic Cognition.台风海燕幸存者创伤后应激障碍的潜在维度:评估基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版症状学的创伤后应激障碍模型及其与创伤后认知的关系。
Psychiatr Q. 2017 Mar;88(1):9-23. doi: 10.1007/s11126-016-9429-z.
9
PTSD factor structure and relationship with self-construal among internally displaced persons.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的结构因素与境内流离失所者的自我概念的关系。
J Anxiety Disord. 2016 Dec;44:102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
10
Examining the dimensional structure models of secondary traumatic stress based on DSM-5 symptoms.基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版症状审视继发性创伤应激的维度结构模型。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2017 Feb;25:154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.10.024. Epub 2016 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the PCL-5 in China: new insights from its assessments over time and gender invariance.在中国评估《创伤后应激障碍诊断量表第五版》:基于不同时间评估及性别不变性的新见解
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2025 May 19;24(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12991-025-00567-9.
2
The role of anhedonia symptoms in symptomatology of posttraumatic stress disorder and related functional impairments among traumatized Chinese adults.快感缺失症状在中国成年创伤患者创伤后应激障碍症状学及相关功能损害中的作用。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2501824. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2501824. Epub 2025 May 19.
3
Psychometric properties of the post-traumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) in Chinese stroke patients.
中文脑卒中患者DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 9;23(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04493-y.
4
Nightmares and psychiatric symptoms: A systematic review of longitudinal, experimental, and clinical trial studies.梦魇和精神症状:纵向、实验和临床试验研究的系统评价。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2023 Mar;100:102241. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102241. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
5
Factor structure of the posttraumatic stress disorder checklist (PCL-17) in 279,897 million veteran program participants.创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-17)在 279897 万退役军人计划参与者中的因子结构。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Jan;319:114994. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114994. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
6
Assessing psychological resilience: translation and validation of the Chinese version of the resilience evaluation scale (RES).评估心理弹性:韧性评估量表(RES)中文版的翻译与验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Oct 26;13(2):2133358. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2133358. eCollection 2022.
7
Supportive psychological therapy can effectively treat post-stroke post-traumatic stress disorder at the early stage.支持性心理治疗可在早期有效治疗脑卒中后创伤后应激障碍。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Oct 6;16:1007571. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1007571. eCollection 2022.
8
Psychometric properties of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) checklist for DSM-5 in persons with serious mental illness.用于严重精神疾病患者的 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)检查表的心理计量特性。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Mar 1;13(1):2038924. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2038924. eCollection 2022.
9
DSM-5-TR prolonged grief disorder and DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder are related, yet distinct: confirmatory factor analyses in traumatically bereaved people.DSM-5-TR 延长哀伤障碍与 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍相关,但又不同:创伤性丧亲人群中的验证性因子分析。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Dec 9;12(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.2000131. eCollection 2021.
10
The Gene Is Correlated With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms Through Diverse Epistases in a Traumatized Chinese Population.在一个受过创伤的中国人群中,该基因通过多种上位性与创伤后应激障碍症状相关。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 7;12:665599. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.665599. eCollection 2021.