School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2022 May 31;12(5):e055859. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055859.
This study aims to compare early mortality after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using conventional intramedullary instrumentation to TKA performed using technology-assisted (non-intramedullary) instrumentation.
Comparative observational study. Using data from a large national registry, the 30-day mortality after unilateral TKA performed for osteoarthritis was compared between procedures using conventional instrumentation and those using technology-assisted instrumentation. Firth logistic regression was used to calculate ORs, adjusting for age, sex, use of cement and procedure year for the whole period, and additionally adjusting for American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system class and body mass index (BMI) for the period 2015 to 2019. This analysis was repeated for 7-day and 90-day mortality.
National arthroplasty registry.
People undergoing unilateral, elective TKA for osteoarthritis from 2003 to 2019 inclusive.
TKA performed using conventional intramedullary instrumentation or technology-assisted instrumentation.
30-day mortality (primary), and 7-day and 90-day mortality.
A total of 581 818 unilateral TKA procedures performed for osteoarthritis were included, of which 602 (0.10%) died within 30 days of surgery. The OR of death within 30 days following TKA performed with conventional instrumentation compared with technology-assisted instrumentation, adjusted for age, sex, cement use, procedure year, American Society of Anesthesiologists and BMI was 1.72 (95% CI, 1.23 to 2.41, p=0.001). The corresponding ORs for 7-day and 90-day mortality were 2.21 (96% CI, 1.34 to 3.66, p=0.002) and 1.35 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.69, p=0.010), respectively.
The use of conventional instrumentation during TKA is associated with higher odds of early postoperative death than when technology-assisted instrumentation is used. This difference may be explained by complications related to fat embolism secondary to intramedullary rods used in conventional instrumentation. Given the high number of TKA performed annually worldwide, increasing the use of technology-assisted instrumentation may reduce early post-operative mortality.
本研究旨在比较传统髓内器械辅助下全膝关节置换术(TKA)与非髓内器械辅助下 TKA 的早期死亡率。
比较观察性研究。使用来自大型国家注册数据库的数据,比较了 2003 年至 2019 年期间因骨关节炎行单侧 TKA 时,使用传统器械和非髓内器械辅助下的手术 30 天死亡率。采用 Firth 逻辑回归计算比值比(OR),对整个时期的年龄、性别、骨水泥使用和手术年份进行调整,对于 2015 年至 2019 年期间,还对美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类系统分级和体重指数(BMI)进行调整。对 7 天和 90 天死亡率进行了重复分析。
国家关节置换登记处。
2003 年至 2019 年期间因骨关节炎行单侧、择期 TKA 的人群。
使用传统髓内器械或非髓内器械辅助下的 TKA。
30 天死亡率(主要)和 7 天及 90 天死亡率。
共纳入 581818 例因骨关节炎行单侧 TKA 手术,其中 602 例(0.10%)术后 30 天内死亡。与非髓内器械辅助 TKA 相比,传统髓内器械辅助 TKA 术后 30 天内死亡的 OR 为 1.72(95%CI,1.23 至 2.41,p=0.001)。7 天和 90 天死亡率的相应 OR 分别为 2.21(96%CI,1.34 至 3.66,p=0.002)和 1.35(95%CI,1.07 至 1.69,p=0.010)。
TKA 中使用传统器械与术后早期死亡的风险增加相关,而非髓内器械辅助下的 TKA 则风险较低。这种差异可能与传统髓内器械使用过程中引起的与脂肪栓塞相关的并发症有关。鉴于全球每年 TKA 手术数量巨大,增加使用非髓内器械辅助下的 TKA 可能会降低术后早期死亡率。