Suppr超能文献

患者参与罕见病研究:文献范围综述及对挪威研究人员经验和看法的混合方法评估。

Patient involvement in rare diseases research: a scoping review of the literature and mixed method evaluation of Norwegian researchers' experiences and perceptions.

机构信息

TRS National Resource Centre for Rare Disorders, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1450 Nesoddtangen, Nesodden, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 May 31;17(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02357-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients' involvement (PI) in research is recognized as a valuable strategy for increasing the quality, developing more targeted research and to speed up more innovative research dissemination. Nevertheless, patient involvement in rare diseases research (PI-RDR) is scarce. The aims were: To study the Norwegian researchers` experiences and perceptions of PI-RDR and review the literature on PI-RDR.

METHODS

  1. A systematic scoping review of the literature on PI-RDR. 2. A cross-sectional questionnaire study with close-ended and open-ended questions to investigate the researchers` experiences.

RESULTS

In the scoping review 608 articles read in full-text and 13 articles (one review and twelve primary studies) were included. The heterogeneity of the design, methodology and results was large. Most studies described several benefits of PI, but few described methods for measuring impacts and effectiveness of PI-RDR. In the cross sectional part of this study, 145 of 251 employees working in the nine Norwegian Centers on Rare Diseases participated, of these 69 were researchers. Most (95%) of the researchers claimed that rare diseases research is more challenging than for the more common diseases. The majority (95%) argued that PI-RDR may increase the quality of the studies and the relevance, and most (89%) agreed that PI-RDR in dissemination may increase the awareness and public interest for rare diseases. In the open-ended questions several researchers also claimed challenges related to PI-RDR, and many had proposal for improving PI and promotion of rare disease research.

CONCLUSION

Both the literature and researchers emphasized that PI-RDR is important for improving research quality and increase the public attention on rare diseases, but what constitutes effective PI-RDR still remain unclear. More research on the design, methodology and assessment for measuring the impact of PI-RDR is warranted.

摘要

背景

患者参与(PI)在研究中被认为是提高质量、开发更有针对性的研究和加速更具创新性的研究传播的有价值的策略。然而,患者在罕见病研究(PI-RDR)中的参与很少。目的是:研究挪威研究人员对 PI-RDR 的经验和看法,并回顾 PI-RDR 的文献。

方法

  1. 对 PI-RDR 文献进行系统的范围综述。2. 采用封闭式和开放式问题的横断面问卷调查,调查研究人员的经验。

结果

在范围综述中,全文阅读了 608 篇文章,纳入了 13 篇文章(一篇综述和十二篇原始研究)。设计、方法和结果的异质性很大。大多数研究描述了 PI 的几个好处,但很少描述衡量 PI-RDR 的影响和有效性的方法。在这项研究的横断面部分,251 名在九个挪威罕见病中心工作的员工中有 145 人参与,其中 69 人是研究人员。大多数(95%)研究人员认为罕见病研究比常见疾病更具挑战性。大多数(95%)人认为 PI-RDR 可以提高研究质量和相关性,大多数(89%)人认为在传播中 PI-RDR 可以提高对罕见病的认识和公众兴趣。在开放式问题中,几位研究人员还声称 PI-RDR 存在挑战,许多人对改进 PI 和促进罕见病研究提出了建议。

结论

文献和研究人员都强调 PI-RDR 对于提高研究质量和增加公众对罕见病的关注非常重要,但什么构成有效的 PI-RDR 仍然不清楚。需要更多关于设计、方法和评估的研究,以衡量 PI-RDR 的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c1a/9158134/1b29ce316b3e/13023_2022_2357_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验