Department of Sociology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.
Department of Research, Cizik School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2023 May-Jun;138(3):447-455. doi: 10.1177/00333549221091784. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
Given the high rates of poverty observed among sexual minority groups and their social vulnerability, we examined the prevalence and correlation of food hardship, measured as food insecurity, receipt of free or reduced-cost food, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation among low-income sexual minority and heterosexual adults using population-level health surveillance data.
We used 4 waves of pooled data (2011-2019) from the National Survey of Family Growth for adults aged 18-44 years. We compared the sexual orientation subgroups and used logistic regression to predict the likelihood of food hardship.
Among men, gay and bisexual men had higher odds of experiencing food insecurity than their heterosexual counterparts (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.97 and 1.83, respectively). Compared with heterosexual men, bisexual men had significantly higher odds of receiving free or reduced-cost food, but gay men did not. The odds of participating in SNAP did not differ significantly among gay, bisexual, and heterosexual men. Among women, only bisexual women were more prone to experiencing food insecurity than their heterosexual counterparts (aOR = 1.81). The odds of receiving free or reduced-cost food did not differ significantly among heterosexual, bisexual, and lesbian women. However, compared with heterosexual women, lesbian women had significantly lower odds (aOR = 0.62) and bisexual women had significantly higher odds (aOR = 1.24) of participating in SNAP.
Our findings contribute to the limited literature examining trends in food hardship among sexual minority groups and suggest potentially different patterns of food insecurity, food assistance, and SNAP participation among sexual orientation subgroups, which may call for group-specific, nuanced approaches for lessening food hardship.
鉴于性少数群体贫困率较高且社会脆弱性较大,我们利用人群健康监测数据,调查了低收入性少数群体和异性恋成年人中粮食短缺(以粮食无保障、获得免费或减价食品以及参与补充营养援助计划来衡量)的流行率和相关性。
我们使用了全国家庭增长调查 2011-2019 年 4 个波次的数据(18-44 岁成年人)。我们比较了性取向亚组,并使用逻辑回归预测粮食短缺的可能性。
在男性中,男同性恋和双性恋男性比异性恋男性更有可能经历粮食无保障(调整后的优势比[OR]分别为 1.97 和 1.83)。与异性恋男性相比,双性恋男性获得免费或减价食品的可能性显著更高,但男同性恋者并非如此。参与补充营养援助计划的可能性在男同性恋、双性恋和异性恋男性之间没有显著差异。在女性中,只有双性恋女性比异性恋女性更容易经历粮食无保障(OR=1.81)。获得免费或减价食品的可能性在异性恋、双性恋和女同性恋女性之间没有显著差异。然而,与异性恋女性相比,女同性恋女性参与补充营养援助计划的可能性显著较低(OR=0.62),而双性恋女性的可能性显著较高(OR=1.24)。
我们的研究结果丰富了有限的关于性少数群体粮食短缺趋势的文献,并表明在性取向亚组中,粮食无保障、粮食援助和补充营养援助计划参与可能存在不同的模式,这可能需要针对不同群体采取具体、细致的方法来减轻粮食短缺问题。