Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice, College for Health, Community & Policy, University of Texas at San Antonio, 501 W. Cesar E. Chavez Blvd, San Antonio, TX78207, USA.
Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Dec;24(17):5657-5662. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020005157. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
Food insecurity is a serious public health concern that disproportionately impacts minority groups. However, limited research has assessed food insecurity among sexual minorities. The current study investigates whether individuals identifying as lesbian/gay or bisexual (LGB) sexual orientation were more likely to experience food insecurity relative to heterosexual persons.
Data are from the 2017 and 2018 New York City Community Health Survey. Multinomial logistic regression is used to assess the association between sexual orientation and food insecurity.
A sample of adults (18 years and older) who identify as heterosexual, gay/lesbian or bisexual living in New York City in 2017 and 2018.
18 610 non-institutionalised adults.
Bisexual individuals have significantly higher rates of both mild (relative risk ratio (RRR) = 1·719, 95 % CI 1·148, 2·573) and moderate-to-severe food insecurity (RRR = 1·851, 95 % CI 1·097, 3·122) relative to heterosexual individuals, net of covariates from demographic, household and socio-economic characteristics. Study findings showed no difference in the likelihood of food insecurity between gay/lesbian individuals and heterosexual individuals.
Results illustrate a complex interplay between sexual orientation and food insecurity among adults living in New York City. Findings suggest that efforts to connect LGB individuals to public assistance programmes such as Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program, as well as providing information and connections to food assistance through local LGBTQ+ centres, government agencies (i.e., NYC Human Resources Administration) and non-profit organisations (i.e., Food Bank for New York City) may be beneficial approaches to alleviate food insecurity among this population.
食品不安全是一个严重的公共卫生问题,对少数族裔的影响尤为严重。然而,关于性少数群体的食品不安全问题的研究有限。本研究调查了同性恋/女同性恋或双性恋(LGB)性取向的个体是否比异性恋者更容易经历食品不安全。
数据来自 2017 年和 2018 年纽约市社区健康调查。使用多项逻辑回归来评估性取向与食品不安全之间的关联。
2017 年和 2018 年居住在纽约市的自认为是异性恋、同性恋/女同性恋或双性恋的成年人(18 岁及以上)样本。
18610 名非机构化成年人。
与异性恋者相比,双性恋者轻度(相对风险比(RRR)=1.719,95%CI 1.148,2.573)和中重度食品不安全(RRR=1.851,95%CI 1.097,3.122)的发生率显著更高,调整了人口统计学、家庭和社会经济特征的协变量后。研究结果表明,同性恋/女同性恋者与异性恋者相比,食品不安全的可能性没有差异。
结果说明了纽约市成年人中性取向和食品不安全之间的复杂相互作用。研究结果表明,通过补充营养援助计划等公共援助计划将 LGB 个人联系起来,并通过当地的 LGBTQ+中心、政府机构(例如纽约市人力资源管理局)和非营利组织(例如纽约市食品银行)提供有关食品援助的信息和联系,可能是缓解该人群食品不安全的有益方法。