Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Institute of Translational Genomics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany, and Technical University of Munich (TUM) and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022 Sep;74(9):1488-1496. doi: 10.1002/art.42246. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) allow risk stratification using common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and clinical applications are currently explored for several diseases. This study was undertaken to assess the risk of hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) using PRS.
We analyzed 12,732 individuals from a population-based cohort from the Rotterdam Study (n = 11,496), a clinical cohort (Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee [CHECK] study; n = 908), and a high-risk cohort of overweight women (Prevention of Knee OA in Overweight Females [PROOF] study; n = 328), for the association of the PRS with prevalence/incidence of radiographic OA, of clinical OA, and of total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). The hip PRS and knee PRS contained 44 and 24 independent SNPs, respectively, and were derived from a recent genome-wide association study meta-analysis. Standardized PRS (with Z transformation) were used in all analyses.
We found a stronger association of the PRS for clinically defined OA compared to radiographic OA phenotypes, and we observed the highest PRS risk stratification for TKR/THR. The odds ratio (OR) per SD was 1.3 for incident THR (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.1-1.5) and 1.6 (95% CI 1.3-1.9) for incident TKR in the Rotterdam Study. The knee PRS was associated with incident clinical knee OA in the CHECK study (OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1-1.5]), but not for the PROOF study (OR 1.2 [95% CI 0.8-1.7]). The OR for OA increased gradually across the PRS distribution, up to 2.1 (95% CI 1.4-3.2) for individuals with the 10% highest PRS compared to the middle 50% of the PRS distribution.
Our findings validated the association of PRS across OA definitions. Since OA is becoming frequent and primary prevention is not commonly applicable, PRS-based risk assessment could play a role in OA prevention. However, the utility of PRS is dependent on the setting. Further studies are needed to test the integration of genetic risk assessment in diverse health care settings.
多基因风险评分(PRS)可利用常见的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)进行风险分层,目前正在探索其在多种疾病中的临床应用。本研究旨在评估 PRS 对髋和膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的风险。
我们分析了来自基于人群的鹿特丹研究(n=11496)、临床队列(髋关节和膝关节队列[CHECK]研究;n=908)和超重女性的高危队列(超重女性膝关节 OA 预防[PROOF]研究;n=328)中 12732 名个体,以评估 PRS 与放射影像学 OA、临床 OA 以及全髋关节置换术(THR)或全膝关节置换术(TKR)的相关性。髋关节 PRS 和膝关节 PRS 分别包含 44 个和 24 个独立 SNP,均源自最近的全基因组关联研究荟萃分析。所有分析均使用标准化 PRS(Z 转换)。
我们发现,与放射影像学 OA 表型相比,临床定义的 OA 的 PRS 相关性更强,并且我们观察到 TKR/THR 的 PRS 风险分层最高。在鹿特丹研究中,每个 SD 的 OR 分别为 THR 的 1.3(95%置信区间[95%CI] 1.1-1.5)和 TKR 的 1.6(95%CI 1.3-1.9)。在 CHECK 研究中,膝关节 PRS 与临床膝关节 OA 的发生相关(OR 1.3 [95%CI 1.1-1.5]),但在 PROOF 研究中不相关(OR 1.2 [95%CI 0.8-1.7])。OA 的 OR 随着 PRS 分布的增加而逐渐增加,与 PRS 分布的中间 50%相比,10%最高 PRS 的个体的 OR 高达 2.1(95%CI 1.4-3.2)。
我们的研究结果验证了 PRS 在各种 OA 定义中的相关性。由于 OA 越来越普遍,且初级预防并不常见,因此 PRS 为基础的风险评估可能在 OA 预防中发挥作用。然而,PRS 的实用性取决于具体情况。需要进一步的研究来检验遗传风险评估在不同医疗保健环境中的整合。