• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较传统与旋转器械技术对儿童行为的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Comparing the Influence of Conventional and Rotary Instrumentation Techniques on the Behavior of the Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Govindaraju Lavanya, Subramanian Emg, Jeevanandan Ganesh

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 2):S179-S185. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2108.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2108
PMID:35645475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9108795/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulpectomy has gained popularity in the pediatric dental practice for preserving the primary teeth in its position until exfoliation. There has been a paradigm shift from using manual instrumentation to rotary instrumentation for canal preparation in primary teeth. While studies show that there is a reduction in the instrumentation time with the use of rotary instruments which in turn influences the behavior of the child, its direct effect on the behavior of the children has not been evaluated.

AIM

To compare the behavior of the children during manual and rotary instrumentation for pulpectomy in the primary molars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted in 88 children in any one of the mandibular primary molars indicated for pulpectomy. The canal preparation was done using manual K files and rotary ProTaper (44 children in each group). The influence of these instrumentation techniques on the children was assessed with three different scales- Frankl Behavior Rating Scale; Venham Interval Rating Scale; Wong Baker FACES Pain Scale for evaluating the behavior, anxiety, and the pain experienced by the children, respectively during canal preparation.

RESULTS

A total of 88 participants, comprising 50 females and 38 males, participated in the study. An equal distribution of the participants with respect to age ( = 0.064), gender ( = 0.389), and teeth ( = 0.877) was observed between the groups. More cooperative behavior ( < 0.001); lesser anxiety levels ( < 0.001); lower intensity of pain ( < 0.001) were recorded in the children instrumented using Rotary files.

CONCLUSION

The present study concludes that it is preferable to use rotary instrumentation for primary canal preparation in pediatric practice as it has a more positive influence on the behavior of the children, which eventually determines the success of the treatment.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

With rise in the use of rotary files for pulpectomy in primary teeth, the present paper demonstrates the influence of rotary instrumentation technique for canal preparation during pulpectomy on the behavior of the children in a dental chair. This paper throws light for the pedodontists to effectively perform pulpectomy in children with ease without leaving a psychological impact on the children.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Govindaraju L, Subramanian EMG, Jeevanandan G. Comparing the Influence of Conventional and Rotary Instrumentation Techniques on the Behavior of the Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(S-2):S179-S185.

摘要

背景

牙髓摘除术在儿童牙科实践中越来越受欢迎,用于将乳牙保留在原位直至脱落。在乳牙根管预备中,从使用手动器械到旋转器械已经发生了范式转变。虽然研究表明,使用旋转器械可减少器械操作时间,进而影响儿童的行为,但尚未评估其对儿童行为的直接影响。

目的

比较儿童在乳牙牙髓摘除术的手动和旋转器械操作过程中的行为表现。

材料与方法

对88名需要进行牙髓摘除术的下颌乳牙中的任意一颗进行单盲随机临床试验。使用手动K锉和旋转ProTaper进行根管预备(每组44名儿童)。分别使用三种不同的量表评估这些器械操作技术对儿童的影响——弗兰克行为评定量表;维纳姆间隔评定量表;面部表情疼痛量表,以分别评估儿童在根管预备过程中的行为、焦虑和疼痛感受。

结果

共有88名参与者,包括50名女性和38名男性参与了该研究。两组之间在年龄(P = 0.064)、性别(P = 0.389)和牙齿(P = 0.877)方面的参与者分布均衡。使用旋转锉进行器械操作的儿童表现出更合作的行为(P < 0.001);焦虑水平更低(P < 0.001);疼痛强度更低(P < 0.001)。

结论

本研究得出结论,在儿童牙科实践中,乳牙根管预备使用旋转器械操作更佳,因为它对儿童行为有更积极的影响,最终决定治疗的成功与否。

临床意义

随着旋转锉在乳牙牙髓摘除术中的使用增加,本文展示了牙髓摘除术中根管预备的旋转器械操作技术对牙科椅上儿童行为的影响。本文为儿童牙医轻松有效地为儿童进行牙髓摘除术提供了思路,且不会对儿童造成心理影响。

如何引用本文

Govindaraju L, Subramanian EMG, Jeevanandan G. 比较传统和旋转器械操作技术对儿童行为的影响:一项随机临床试验。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2021;14(S - 2):S179 - S185。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/567c/9108795/c003a7b538b4/ijcpd-14-s179-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/567c/9108795/1f655af84d1b/ijcpd-14-s179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/567c/9108795/e26235cbac4d/ijcpd-14-s179-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/567c/9108795/c003a7b538b4/ijcpd-14-s179-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/567c/9108795/1f655af84d1b/ijcpd-14-s179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/567c/9108795/e26235cbac4d/ijcpd-14-s179-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/567c/9108795/c003a7b538b4/ijcpd-14-s179-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing the Influence of Conventional and Rotary Instrumentation Techniques on the Behavior of the Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.比较传统与旋转器械技术对儿童行为的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 2):S179-S185. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2108.
2
Assessment of Quality of Obturation, Instrumentation Time and Intensity of Pain with Pediatric Rotary File (Kedo-S) in Primary Anterior Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.使用儿童旋转锉(Kedo-S)对乳前牙根管充填质量、预备时间及疼痛强度的评估:一项随机对照临床试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 Nov-Dec;11(6):462-467. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1558.
3
Postoperative Pain with Hand, Reciprocating, and Rotary Instrumentation Techniques after Root Canal Preparation in Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial.乳牙根管预备后使用手动、往复和旋转器械技术的术后疼痛:一项随机临床试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;13(1):21-26. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1709.
4
Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.使用儿童手动和旋转锉系统与传统手动K锉进行下颌乳磨牙牙髓摘除术时的操作时间及根管充填质量的临床评估:一项双盲随机对照试验
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Dec;21(6):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s40368-020-00518-w. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
5
Evaluation and Comparison of Effectiveness of Kedo-S Pediatric Rotary Files vs Manual Instrumentation for Root Canal Treatment in Primary Molars.Kedo-S儿童旋转锉与手动器械用于乳磨牙根管治疗的有效性评估与比较
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Jan-Feb;16(1):22-29. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2511.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Capacity and Efficiency of Kedo-S Pediatric Rotary Files, Rotary ProTaper, and Hand K Files in Primary Molar Pulpectomy.Kedo-S儿童旋转锉、旋转ProTaper锉和手动K锉在乳牙牙髓摘除术中的清洁能力和效率的比较评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 May-Jun;14(3):383-387. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1958.
7
Assessment of clinical and radiographic efficiency of manual and pediatric rotary file systems in primary root canal preparation: a randomized controlled clinical trial.评价手动和儿童机用旋转锉系统在儿童乳牙根管预备中的临床和影像学效果:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 23;23(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03393-1.
8
Comparative Evaluation of Hand K-flex Files, Pediatric Rotary Files, and Reciprocating Files on Instrumentation Time, Postoperative Pain, and Child's Behavior in 4-8-year-old Children.手用K-flex锉、儿童旋转锉和往复锉在4至8岁儿童根管预备时间、术后疼痛及儿童行为方面的比较评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;14(2):201-206. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1919.
9
Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth - A randomised clinical trial.使用手动锉与旋转锉对乳牙进行根管充填的质量及术后疼痛比较——一项随机临床试验
Indian J Dent Res. 2019 Nov-Dec;30(6):904-908. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_37_18.
10
Anti-microbial efficacy of root canal preparation in deciduous teeth with manual and rotary files: A randomized clinical trial.手动和旋转锉根管预备对乳牙的抗菌效果:一项随机临床试验。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2022 Oct;25(10):1681-1686. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_71_22.

引用本文的文献

1
Cleaning Effectiveness and Postoperative Pain Associated With Rotary Instrumentation in Primary Teeth: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Evidence.乳牙旋转器械预备的清洁效果及术后疼痛:系统证据的伞状综述
Cureus. 2025 Jul 6;17(7):e87369. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87369. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Impact of primary molars with periapical disease on permanent successors: A retrospective radiographic study.患有根尖周病的乳磨牙对恒牙胚的影响:一项回顾性影像学研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 28;9(5):e15854. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15854. eCollection 2023 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial.使用手动锉和两种旋转锉系统对乳磨牙进行根管充填质量和预备时间的比较:一项单盲随机对照试验。
Eur J Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):376-379. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_345_16.
2
Single- versus two-visit pulpectomy treatment in primary teeth with apical periodontitis: A double-blind, parallel group, randomized controlled trial.单访与双访牙髓摘除术治疗乳牙根尖周炎:一项双盲、平行组、随机对照试验。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016 Oct-Dec;34(4):383-90. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.191429.
3
Comparison of Cleaning Efficacy and Instrumentation Time in Primary Molars: Mtwo Rotary Instruments vs. Hand K-Files.
乳牙清洁效果与操作时间的比较:Mtwo旋转器械与手动K锉的对比
Iran Endod J. 2015 Fall;10(4):240-3. doi: 10.7508/iej.2015.04.006.
4
Radiographic assessment and chair time of rotary instruments in the pulpectomy of primary second molar teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial.乳牙第二磨牙牙髓摘除术中旋转器械的影像学评估及椅旁操作时间:一项随机对照临床试验
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014 Spring;8(2):84-9. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2014.015. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
5
Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and Pro Taper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth.Mtwo和Pro Taper旋转系统与手动器械在乳牙中的清洁能力比较。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Mar;9(2):146-51. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.95227.
6
Evaluation of cleaning capacity and instrumentation time of manual, hybrid and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars.评价手动、混合和旋转器械技术在乳磨牙中的清洁能力和器械时间。
Int Endod J. 2012 Apr;45(4):379-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01987.x. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
7
The language of pain: A short study.疼痛的语言:一项简短研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2010 Jul;1(3):142-5. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.72778.
8
Comparison between rotary and manual techniques on duration of instrumentation and obturation times in primary teeth.乳牙根管预备和充填时间的旋转技术与手动技术比较。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Summer;35(4):359-63. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.4.8k013k21t39245n8.
9
Review: behaviour management techniques in paediatric dentistry.综述:儿童牙科中的行为管理技术
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010 Aug;11(4):166-74. doi: 10.1007/BF03262738.
10
Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth.乳牙旋转器械与手动器械的比较。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008 Summer;32(4):295-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.32.4.l57l36355u606576.