• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳牙根管预备后使用手动、往复和旋转器械技术的术后疼痛:一项随机临床试验

Postoperative Pain with Hand, Reciprocating, and Rotary Instrumentation Techniques after Root Canal Preparation in Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Jeevanandan Ganesh, Ravindran Vignesh, Subramanian Erulappan Mg, Kumar Aravind S

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;13(1):21-26. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1709.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1709
PMID:32581473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7299878/
Abstract

AIM

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the intensity and duration of postoperative pain after pulpectomy of primary teeth using three preparation techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients were randomly allocated to three groups of 20 patients each, according to the root canal instrumentation techniques used. In group I, the teeth were prepared using manual NiTi K flex files till size 35. In group II, the teeth were prepared using NiTi K flex files till size 35 in reciprocating motion. In group III, the teeth were prepared using Kedo-S pediatric rotary files. After root canal preparation, the canals were obturated with endoflas paste and were restored permanently with composite filling material. The intensity and duration of postoperative pain were evaluated after 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours, using a four-point pain-intensity scale.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference among the groups, wherein the postoperative pain was more in NiTi K flex files used in reciprocating motion followed by manual NiTi K flex files and Kedo-S pediatric rotary files.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative pain was more with NiTi K flex files in reciprocating motion and was less with Kedo-S rotary files after root canal preparation in primary maxillary molars.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Jeevanandan G, Ravindran V, Subramanian EMG, Postoperative Pain with Hand, Reciprocating, and Rotary Instrumentation Techniques after Root Canal Preparation in Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(1):21-26.

摘要

目的

本随机临床试验的目的是使用三种预备技术评估乳牙牙髓摘除术后疼痛的强度和持续时间。

材料与方法

根据所使用的根管预备技术,将60例患者随机分为三组,每组20例。第一组,使用手动镍钛Kflex锉预备牙齿至35号。第二组,使用镍钛Kflex锉以往复运动方式预备牙齿至35号。第三组,使用Kedo-S儿童旋转锉预备牙齿。根管预备后,根管使用Endoflas糊剂充填,并用复合充填材料永久修复。使用四点疼痛强度量表在术后6、12、24、48和72小时评估术后疼痛的强度和持续时间。

结果

各组之间存在统计学上的显著差异,其中,以往复运动方式使用镍钛Kflex锉术后疼痛更明显,其次是手动镍钛Kflex锉和Kedo-S儿童旋转锉。

结论

在上颌乳磨牙根管预备后,以往复运动方式使用镍钛Kflex锉术后疼痛更明显,而使用Kedo-S旋转锉术后疼痛较轻。

如何引用本文

Jeevanandan G, Ravindran V, Subramanian EMG, 乳牙根管预备后手用、往复运动和旋转器械技术的术后疼痛:一项随机临床试验。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2020;13(1):21-26。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba5/7299878/5e179f70bbdb/ijcpd-13-21-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba5/7299878/5dbe35d527ac/ijcpd-13-21-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba5/7299878/fffb8674342a/ijcpd-13-21-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba5/7299878/5e179f70bbdb/ijcpd-13-21-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba5/7299878/5dbe35d527ac/ijcpd-13-21-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba5/7299878/fffb8674342a/ijcpd-13-21-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba5/7299878/5e179f70bbdb/ijcpd-13-21-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Postoperative Pain with Hand, Reciprocating, and Rotary Instrumentation Techniques after Root Canal Preparation in Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial.乳牙根管预备后使用手动、往复和旋转器械技术的术后疼痛:一项随机临床试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;13(1):21-26. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1709.
2
Assessment of Quality of Obturation, Instrumentation Time and Intensity of Pain with Pediatric Rotary File (Kedo-S) in Primary Anterior Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.使用儿童旋转锉(Kedo-S)对乳前牙根管充填质量、预备时间及疼痛强度的评估:一项随机对照临床试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 Nov-Dec;11(6):462-467. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1558.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Hand K-flex Files, Pediatric Rotary Files, and Reciprocating Files on Instrumentation Time, Postoperative Pain, and Child's Behavior in 4-8-year-old Children.手用K-flex锉、儿童旋转锉和往复锉在4至8岁儿童根管预备时间、术后疼痛及儿童行为方面的比较评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;14(2):201-206. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1919.
4
To Compare and Evaluate Rotary and Manual Techniques in Biomechanical Preparation of Primary Molars to Know Their Effects in Terms of Cleaning and Shaping Efficacy.比较和评估旋转技术与手动技术在乳磨牙生物力学预备中的应用,以了解它们在清洁和成形效果方面的作用。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Aug;17(8):864-870. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2949.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对乳牙中手用K锉、ProTaper旋转锉和Kedo S旋转锉进行根管预备时的牙本质去除和锥度的比较评估。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):332-336. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Capacity and Efficiency of Kedo-S Pediatric Rotary Files, Rotary ProTaper, and Hand K Files in Primary Molar Pulpectomy.Kedo-S儿童旋转锉、旋转ProTaper锉和手动K锉在乳牙牙髓摘除术中的清洁能力和效率的比较评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 May-Jun;14(3):383-387. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1958.
7
Assessing quality of obturation and instrumentation time using Kedo-SG blue, Kedo-SH, and reciprocating hand K-files in primary mandibular molars: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.使用Kedo-SG蓝色、Kedo-SH和往复式手动K锉评估下颌乳磨牙的根管充填质量和预备时间:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 Sep 25;18:76. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.326649. eCollection 2021.
8
Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth - A randomised clinical trial.使用手动锉与旋转锉对乳牙进行根管充填的质量及术后疼痛比较——一项随机临床试验
Indian J Dent Res. 2019 Nov-Dec;30(6):904-908. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_37_18.
9
Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.使用儿童手动和旋转锉系统与传统手动K锉进行下颌乳磨牙牙髓摘除术时的操作时间及根管充填质量的临床评估:一项双盲随机对照试验
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Dec;21(6):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s40368-020-00518-w. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
10
Evaluation and Comparison of Effectiveness of Kedo-S Pediatric Rotary Files vs Manual Instrumentation for Root Canal Treatment in Primary Molars.Kedo-S儿童旋转锉与手动器械用于乳磨牙根管治疗的有效性评估与比较
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Jan-Feb;16(1):22-29. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2511.

引用本文的文献

1
Cleaning Effectiveness and Postoperative Pain Associated With Rotary Instrumentation in Primary Teeth: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Evidence.乳牙旋转器械预备的清洁效果及术后疼痛:系统证据的伞状综述
Cureus. 2025 Jul 6;17(7):e87369. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87369. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Preparation With Different Instruments in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.乳牙使用不同器械进行根管预备后的术后疼痛:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70180. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70180.
3
Different outcomes of rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth pulpectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Preparation with Hand and Rotary Files in Primary Molar Teeth.乳牙使用手动和旋转锉进行根管预备后的术后疼痛
Pediatr Dent. 2017 May 15;39(3):192-196.
2
Kedo-S Paediatric Rotary Files for Root Canal Preparation in Primary Teeth - Case Report.用于乳牙根管预备的Kedo-S儿童旋转锉——病例报告
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):ZR03-ZR05. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25856.9508. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
3
Reciprocating vs Rotary Instrumentation in Pediatric Endodontics: Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals using Two Single-file Systems.
乳牙牙髓切断术中旋转器械与手动器械操作的不同结果:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Mar 24. doi: 10.1007/s40368-025-01020-x.
4
Comparative evaluation of Hand, Rotary and Reciprocation motion on Dentin thickness and instrumentation time in Primary anterior teeth using CBCT: An observational study.使用CBCT对乳牙前牙进行手用、旋转和往复运动在牙本质厚度及预备时间方面的比较评估:一项观察性研究
J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 May 1;15(5):e396-e402. doi: 10.4317/jced.60347. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Evaluation of Quality of Obturation Using Two Different Rotary Files and Hand Files in Primary Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Trial.使用两种不同旋转锉和手用锉评估乳牙根管充填质量:一项随机对照试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):471-474. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1990.
儿童牙髓病学中往复式与旋转式根管预备:使用两种单根管系统对乳牙根管进行锥形束计算机断层扫描分析
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jan-Mar;9(1):45-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1332. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
4
Comparison of endoflas and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary dentition.乳牙中Endoflas与氧化锌丁香酚作为根管充填材料的比较。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014 Oct-Dec;32(4):317-21. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.140958.
5
Clinical evaluation of apex locator and radiography in primary teeth.乳牙根尖定位仪与X线片的临床评估
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015 May;25(3):199-203. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12128. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
6
Comparison of apical debris extrusion using a conventional and two rotary techniques.使用传统技术和两种旋转技术对根尖碎屑挤出情况的比较。
Iran Endod J. 2009 Fall;4(4):135-8. Epub 2009 Oct 10.
7
Pediatric and general dentists' attitudes toward pulp therapy for primary teeth.儿科牙医和普通牙医对乳牙牙髓治疗的态度。
Pediatr Dent. 2012 May-Jun;34(3):210-5.
8
Evaluation of cleaning capacity and instrumentation time of manual, hybrid and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars.评价手动、混合和旋转器械技术在乳磨牙中的清洁能力和器械时间。
Int Endod J. 2012 Apr;45(4):379-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01987.x. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
9
Comparison between rotary and manual techniques on duration of instrumentation and obturation times in primary teeth.乳牙根管预备和充填时间的旋转技术与手动技术比较。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Summer;35(4):359-63. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.4.8k013k21t39245n8.
10
Reduction in bacterial loading using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate as an irrigant in pulpectomized primary teeth: a preliminary report.使用2%葡萄糖酸氯己定作为冲洗剂降低根管治疗乳牙的细菌载量:初步报告
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Spring;35(3):265-70. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.3.y052311j23617837.