Suppr超能文献

不同预备技术对根管形态的影响:一项研究

Effect of Different Preparation Techniques on Root Canal Geometry: An Study.

作者信息

Bheda Pooja, Kakade Adesh, Takate Vilas, Juneja Akansha, Dighe Kishor, Gupta Bharat

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Dentistry, NMC Royal Medical Centre, Karama, Abu Dhabi.

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Nair Hospital Dental College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(Suppl 1):S71-S79. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2136.

Abstract

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

To compare and evaluate canal preparation using hand stainless steel files, hand ProTaper files, and rotary ProTaper files for change in root canal geometry in terms of surface area and volume changes assessed by computed tomography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was conducted in Nair Hospital and Dental College, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry in collaboration with insight CBCT, imaging technologies. A total of 36 extracted human primary mandibular second molars were collected from the Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry. All the teeth were scanned using cone-beam CT (i-CAT CT Scanner Next Generation, Imaging Sciences International) preoperatively and postoperatively to assess the mean absolute change in surface area and mean change in the volume of all the canals at different levels with the use of hand stainless steel files, hand ProTaper and rotary ProTaper files.

RESULTS

ProTaper instruments, both hand ProTaper and rotary ProTaper caused significant changes in the surface area in the coronal thirds and middle thirds of the canal when compared to hand stainless steel files. No difference was found in surface area and volume changes between hand ProTaper and rotary ProTaper instrumentation.

CONCLUSION

Use of ProTaper instruments for preparation of deciduous teeth can render benefit of an improved canal preparation to facilitate better obturation and successful root canal therapy.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Bheda P, Kakade A, Takate V, Effect of Different Preparation Techniques on Root Canal Geometry: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(S-1):S71-S79.

摘要

目的

使用计算机断层扫描评估表面积和体积变化,比较和评价使用手动不锈钢锉、手动ProTaper锉和旋转ProTaper锉进行根管预备时根管形态的变化。

材料与方法

本研究在奈尔医院和牙科学院的儿童与预防牙科系与insight CBCT影像技术公司合作开展。从儿童与预防牙科系收集了36颗拔除的人类下颌乳第二磨牙。所有牙齿在术前和术后均使用锥形束CT(i-CAT CT Scanner Next Generation,Imaging Sciences International)进行扫描,以评估使用手动不锈钢锉、手动ProTaper锉和旋转ProTaper锉时不同水平所有根管的表面积平均绝对变化和体积平均变化。

结果

与手动不锈钢锉相比,ProTaper器械,包括手动ProTaper锉和旋转ProTaper锉,在根管的冠三分之一和中三分之一处引起了显著的表面积变化。手动ProTaper锉和旋转ProTaper锉器械在表面积和体积变化方面未发现差异。

结论

使用ProTaper器械预备乳牙可改善根管预备,有利于更好地进行根管充填和成功的根管治疗。

如何引用本文

Bheda P, Kakade A, Takate V, 不同预备技术对根管形态的影响:一项研究。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2022;15(S-1):S71-S79。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a36/9108813/5202f749dccc/ijcpd-15-s71-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验