• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射影像术、根尖定位仪和一体化内置马达根尖定位仪在乳牙根管测量中的比较

Comparison of Radiovisiography, an Apex Locator and an Integrated Endomotor-inbuilt Apex Locator in Primary Teeth Endometrics.

作者信息

Khan Suleman Abbas, Khanna Rinee, Navit Saumya, Jabeen Seema, Grover Nishi, Pramanik Saurabh

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saraswati Dental College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Awadh Dental College and Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(Suppl 1):S18-S21. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2123.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2123
PMID:35645506
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9108817/
Abstract

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of radiovisiography (RVG), Root ZX mini Apex locator, and Endo radar's inbuilt Apex Locator during working length determination determination in primary teeth with the actual/direct canal length.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

58 primary teeth indicated for extraction in children of age group 4-12 years were selected. RVG, Root ZX mini Apex Locator, and Endo radar's Apex Locator were used to determine the working length intraorally. Following extraction of the teeth, the actual working length was determined with magnifying loupes (2.5×) using a K-file and an endodontic ruler. The data was tabulated and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

84 canals (58 teeth) were evaluated and Root ZX mini Electronic Apex Locator (EAL) showed no statistically significant difference with the actual measurement ( = 0.18) whereas Endo radar and RVG showed statistically significant difference. Endo radar underestimated, while RVG overestimated the working length. The most accurate method for working length measurements of the root canals in primary teeth was Root ZX mini EAL, followed by Endo radar and the least accurate was RVG.

CONCLUSION

The Root ZX mini Apex Locator showed the most promising results and had an excellent degree of agreement with actual working length, followed by Endo radar and RVG.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Khan SA, Khanna R, Navit S, et al. Comparison of Radiovisiography, an Apex Locator and an Integrated Endomotor-inbuilt Apex Locator in Primary Teeth Endometrics. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(S-1):S18-S21.

摘要

目的

比较放射成像(RVG)、Root ZX迷你根尖定位仪和Endo radar内置根尖定位仪在确定乳牙工作长度时与实际/直接根管长度的准确性。

材料与方法

选取4 - 12岁儿童中58颗需拔除的乳牙。使用RVG、Root ZX迷你根尖定位仪和Endo radar根尖定位仪在口内确定工作长度。牙齿拔除后,使用放大倍数为2.5倍的放大镜、K锉和根管测量尺确定实际工作长度。将数据列表并进行统计分析。

结果

共评估了84个根管(58颗牙齿),Root ZX迷你电子根尖定位仪(EAL)与实际测量值相比无统计学显著差异(P = 0.18),而Endo radar和RVG有统计学显著差异。Endo radar低估了工作长度,而RVG高估了工作长度。乳牙根管工作长度测量最准确的方法是Root ZX迷你EAL,其次是Endo radar,最不准确的是RVG。

结论

Root ZX迷你根尖定位仪显示出最有前景的结果,与实际工作长度的一致性极佳,其次是Endo radar和RVG。

如何引用本文

Khan SA, Khanna R, Navit S,等。放射成像、根尖定位仪和集成牙髓动力装置内置根尖定位仪在乳牙牙髓测量中的比较。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》。2022;15(S - 1):S18 - S21。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10c2/9108817/ae6bf37457c8/ijcpd-15-s18-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10c2/9108817/ae6bf37457c8/ijcpd-15-s18-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10c2/9108817/ae6bf37457c8/ijcpd-15-s18-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Radiovisiography, an Apex Locator and an Integrated Endomotor-inbuilt Apex Locator in Primary Teeth Endometrics.放射影像术、根尖定位仪和一体化内置马达根尖定位仪在乳牙根管测量中的比较
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(Suppl 1):S18-S21. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2123.
2
Comparative evaluation of root ZX Mini® apex locator and radiovisiography in determining the working length of primary molars: An In Vivo study.比较Root ZX Mini®根尖定位仪与根尖X线片在确定乳磨牙工作长度方面的效果:一项体内研究
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021 Apr-Jun;11(2):257-262. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
3
Clinical Evaluation of Conventional Radiography, Radiovisiography, and an Electronic Apex Locator in Determining the Working Length in Primary Teeth.传统根尖片、数字化根尖片及电子根尖定位仪确定乳牙工作长度的临床评估
Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;38(1):37-41.
4
Comparative Assessment of Working Length Determination: Apex Locators versus Endomotor with Built-in Apex Locator in Single-Rooted Permanent Teeth.单根恒牙工作长度测定的比较评估:根尖定位仪与内置根尖定位仪的根管马达对比
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2892-S2894. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_487_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
The accuracy of root canal measurements using the Mini Apex Locator and Root ZX-II: an evaluation in vitro.使用Mini Apex根管长度测定仪和Root ZX-II进行根管测量的准确性:一项体外评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Sep;104(3):e50-3. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.03.025.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Electronic Apex Locators and Radiovisiography for Working Length Determination in Primary Teeth in vivo.电子根尖定位仪与根尖X线片在乳牙活髓牙工作长度测定中的对比评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Apr-Jun;9(2):118-23. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1346. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
7
A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Electronic Apex Locator, Digital Radiography, and Conventional Radiographic Method for Root Canal Working Length Determination in Primary Teeth: An Study.电子根尖定位仪、数字X线摄影及传统X线摄影法在乳牙根管工作长度测定中的疗效比较评估:一项研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Sep-Oct;13(5):523-528. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1821.
8
Accuracy of an Electronic Apex Locator for Working Length Determination in Primary Anterior Teeth.一种电子根尖定位仪用于确定乳前牙工作长度的准确性
J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Apr;12(4):243-8.
9
Comparison of Accuracy of Apex Locator with Tactile and Conventional Radiographic Method for Working Length Determination in Primary and Permanent Teeth.根尖定位仪与触觉及传统X线片法在确定乳牙和恒牙工作长度时的准确性比较
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):235-239. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1768.
10
Accuracy of Working Length Determination using NovApex and Root-ZX Apex Locators: An in vitro Study.使用NovApex和Root-ZX根尖定位仪确定工作长度的准确性:一项体外研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 May 1;18(5):383-385. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2051.

引用本文的文献

1
Conventional methods and electronic apical locator in determining working length in different primary teeth: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.传统方法与电子根尖定位仪在确定不同乳牙工作长度中的应用:临床研究的系统评价与Meta分析
Evid Based Dent. 2025 Jan 8. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01105-4.
2
Integrated electronic apex locators for determining working length: a systematic review of in-vitro studies.用于确定工作长度的集成电子根尖定位仪:体外研究的系统评价
Odontology. 2025 Jul;113(3):918-929. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-01039-4. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
3
Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy of Electronic Apex Locator and Digital Radiography for Working Length Determination in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and electronic apex locator for root canal length determination in primary teeth.比较锥形束计算机断层扫描和电子根尖定位仪在确定乳牙根管长度方面的准确性。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Apr-Jun;37(2):157-161. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.261334.
2
Accuracy of 2 Endodontic Rotary Motors with Integrated Apex Locator.两种带有内置根尖定位仪的根管马达的准确性。
J Endod. 2017 Oct;43(10):1716-1719. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
3
Root ZX Electronic Foramen Locator: An Ex Vivo Study of Its Three Models' Precision and Reproducibility.
电子根尖定位仪与数字放射成像在乳牙工作长度测定中准确性的比较评估:一项系统评价
J Dent (Shiraz). 2024 Sep 1;25(3):203-214. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.97323.2006. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Nationwide Trends of Modern Endodontic Practices Related to Working Length, Instrumentation, Magnification, and Obturation: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey Comparing Endodontic and Non-Endodontic Specialties Practicing Root Canal Treatment in India.与工作长度、根管预备、放大技术和根管充填相关的现代牙髓治疗实践的全国性趋势:一项比较性横断面调查,对比印度从事根管治疗的牙髓科和非牙髓科专业。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Apr 2;16:865-873. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S397778. eCollection 2023.
Root ZX电子根尖定位仪:对其三种型号的精度和可重复性的体外研究
Int J Dent. 2017;2017:5893790. doi: 10.1155/2017/5893790. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
4
Changes in Root Canal Length Determined during Mechanical Preparation Stages and Their Relationship with the Accuracy of Root ZX II.机械预备阶段根管长度的变化及其与Root ZX II准确性的关系
J Endod. 2016 Nov;42(11):1683-1686. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
5
Clinical Evaluation of Conventional Radiography, Radiovisiography, and an Electronic Apex Locator in Determining the Working Length in Primary Teeth.传统根尖片、数字化根尖片及电子根尖定位仪确定乳牙工作长度的临床评估
Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;38(1):37-41.
6
The Precision of Electronic Apex Locators in Working Length Determination: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Literature.电子根尖定位仪在工作长度测定中的准确性:文献的系统评价与Meta分析
J Endod. 2015 Nov;41(11):1818-23. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.012. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
7
Accuracy and reliability of working length determination by Gold Reciproc Motor in reciprocating movement.使用金 reciproc 电机在往复运动中确定工作长度的准确性和可靠性。
J Endod. 2014 May;40(5):694-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 6.
8
An in vitro comparison of working length determination by two motor-driven electronic apex locators.
Minerva Stomatol. 2013 Mar;62(3):57-61.
9
Radiographic versus electronic root canal working length determination.影像学与电子法测定根管工作长度
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Nov-Dec;22(6):777-80. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.94666.
10
Accuracy of an electronic apex locator in primary teeth with root resorption.电子根尖定位仪在乳牙牙根吸收时的准确性。
Int Endod J. 2009 Feb;42(2):115-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01476.x.