• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高日常用品重复开放应用测试(ROAT)标准化的实用建议。

Practical suggestions to improve standardization of repeated open application testing (ROAT) for daily use products.

作者信息

Kaliyadan Feroze, Jayasree Puravoor, Ashique Karalikkattil T

机构信息

King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.

Medical Trust Hospital, India.

出版信息

Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2022 Apr;39(2):304-306. doi: 10.5114/ada.2021.102850. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

DOI:10.5114/ada.2021.102850
PMID:35645680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9131969/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Repeated open application testing (ROAT) is an important adjuvant in the evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis. There are variations in the way ROAT is used by practitioners and standardizing the method, in terms of the area and amount of the antigen applied, could help improve the validity of the process.

AIM

Our study attempts to address ways in which part of the ROAT technique can be standardized - with respect to the area and amount of application and validation of the same through consensus opinion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two proposed modifications - one for the area of application (using waterproof surgical markers and a stencil to mark the area of application) and one for daily amount applied (using easily available 1 cm syringes), for the ROAT technique were drafted. The same was discussed with a total of 10 dermatologists. The participants were given four statements and were asked to choose one option for each statement (strongly agree - agree - neutral - disagree - strongly disagree). All the respondents were also asked to give their opinion on possible limitations and problems of the proposed modifications and possible solutions for the same.

RESULTS

There was generally a consensus among the 10 dermatologists, with the majority agreeing that the proposed modifications were both effective and practical.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple practical modifications of the ROAT technique like marking the area to be applied using a waterproof skin marker and stencil, and the use of 1 cm syringes to dispense the test product, can improve the standardization of the process.

摘要

引言

重复开放涂抹试验(ROAT)是评估过敏性接触性皮炎的一项重要辅助手段。临床医生使用ROAT的方式存在差异,在涂抹抗原的面积和用量方面规范该方法,有助于提高检测过程的有效性。

目的

我们的研究试图探讨使ROAT技术的部分环节标准化的方法——在涂抹面积和用量方面,并通过达成共识来验证其有效性。

材料与方法

针对ROAT技术起草了两项改进建议——一项是关于涂抹面积(使用防水手术标记笔和模板标记涂抹区域),另一项是关于每日用量(使用易于获取的1厘米注射器)。与总共10名皮肤科医生讨论了这些建议。参与者收到四条陈述,并被要求为每条陈述选择一个选项(强烈同意——同意——中立——不同意——强烈不同意)。所有受访者还被要求就所提议改进措施可能存在的局限性和问题以及相应的可能解决方案发表意见。

结果

10名皮肤科医生总体上达成了共识,大多数人认为所提议的改进措施既有效又实用。

结论

对ROAT技术进行简单实用的改进,如使用防水皮肤标记笔和模板标记涂抹区域,以及使用1厘米注射器 dispense 测试产品,可以提高检测过程的标准化程度。 (原文中“dispense”这里翻译为“分配、分发”,结合语境就是用注射器分发测试产品,由于不确定具体含义,可根据实际情况调整。)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46f8/9131969/2583db8f5e75/PDIA-39-43080-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46f8/9131969/e0bea1466f94/PDIA-39-43080-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46f8/9131969/2583db8f5e75/PDIA-39-43080-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46f8/9131969/e0bea1466f94/PDIA-39-43080-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46f8/9131969/2583db8f5e75/PDIA-39-43080-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Practical suggestions to improve standardization of repeated open application testing (ROAT) for daily use products.提高日常用品重复开放应用测试(ROAT)标准化的实用建议。
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2022 Apr;39(2):304-306. doi: 10.5114/ada.2021.102850. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
2
Validation of a questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix I.
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Apr;182(4):955-964. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18224. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
3
Clinical Utilization of Repeated Open Application Test Among American Contact Dermatitis Society Members.美国接触性皮炎学会成员中重复开放应用测试的临床应用。
Dermatitis. 2015 Sep-Oct;26(5):224-9. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000132.
4
Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to lanolin: A ROAT study.羊毛脂斑贴试验阳性反应的临床意义:一项 ROAT 研究。
Contact Dermatitis. 2021 Jan;84(1):41-49. doi: 10.1111/cod.13689. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
5
Validation of questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix II: the EDEN Fragrance Study.基于重复开放式应用测试的基于香氛混合物 II 的组成部分的问卷算法验证:EDEN 香氛研究。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Aug;35(8):1692-1701. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17315. Epub 2021 May 16.
6
Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.镍过敏:斑贴试验与重复开放应用试验阈值之间的关系
Br J Dermatol. 2007 Oct;157(4):723-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08095.x. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
7
Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.羟基异己基 3-环己烯甲醛过敏:斑贴试验与重复开放应用试验阈值之间的关系。
Br J Dermatol. 2009 Sep;161(3):560-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09256.x. Epub 2009 May 27.
8
Methyldibromoglutaronitrile allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.甲基二溴戊二腈过敏:斑贴试验与重复开放应用试验阈值之间的关系
Br J Dermatol. 2008 Nov;159(5):1138-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08821.x. Epub 2008 Sep 15.
9
The dose-response relationship between the patch test and ROAT and the potential use for regulatory purposes.斑贴试验与 ROAT 之间的剂量反应关系及其在监管用途方面的潜在用途。
Contact Dermatitis. 2009 Oct;61(4):201-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01607.x.
10
The time-dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals.异丁香酚过敏个体诱发接触性皮炎的时间-剂量-反应关系。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2001 Feb 1;170(3):166-71. doi: 10.1006/taap.2000.9095.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of a questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix I.
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Apr;182(4):955-964. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18224. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
2
Clinical Utilization of Repeated Open Application Test Among American Contact Dermatitis Society Members.美国接触性皮炎学会成员中重复开放应用测试的临床应用。
Dermatitis. 2015 Sep-Oct;26(5):224-9. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000132.
3
Quantitative relationships between patch test reactivity and use test reactivity: an overview.斑贴试验反应性与使用试验反应性之间的定量关系:综述。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2008;27(3):241-8. doi: 10.1080/15569520802251130.
4
Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.镍过敏:斑贴试验与重复开放应用试验阈值之间的关系
Br J Dermatol. 2007 Oct;157(4):723-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08095.x. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
5
Dose per unit area - a study of elicitation of nickel allergy.单位面积剂量——镍过敏激发研究
Contact Dermatitis. 2007 May;56(5):255-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01096.x.
6
Correlations of patch test reactivity and the repeated open application test (ROAT)/provocative use test (PUT).斑贴试验反应性与重复开放应用试验(ROAT)/激发使用试验(PUT)的相关性。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2004 Nov;42(11):1719-25. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009.
7
Use tests: ROAT (repeated open application test)/PUT (provocative use test): an overview.使用测试:反复开放性应用测试(ROAT)/激发性使用测试(PUT):概述
Contact Dermatitis. 2000 Jul;43(1):1-3. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.043001001.x.
8
The repeated open application test: suggestions for a scale of evaluation.反复开放性应用测试:评估量表建议
Contact Dermatitis. 1998 Aug;39(2):95-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05850.x.
9
Corticosteroid allergy.皮质类固醇过敏。
Contact Dermatitis. 1995 Oct;33(4):240-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00474.x.
10
Size of the test area does not affect the result of the repeated open application test.试验区域的大小不影响重复开放应用试验的结果。
Contact Dermatitis. 1993 May;28(5):299-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1993.tb03442.x.