• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰健康素养有限的慢性病患者对自我管理干预结果的偏好。

Preferences Regarding Self-Management Intervention Outcomes of Dutch Chronically Ill Patients With Limited Health Literacy.

机构信息

Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Red de investigación en servicios de salud en enfermedades crónicas, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 May 11;10:842462. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.842462. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.842462
PMID:35646791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9130718/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For many chronically ill patients self-management of their disease is difficult. This may be especially true for people with limited health literacy as they are faced with additional challenges in the day-to-day management of their disease. Research has shown that self-management support is most effective when tailored to the needs and preferences of patients. Therefore, this study explores the preferences regarding self-management outcomes of chronically ill patients with limited health literacy.

METHODS

A total of 35 patients with limited health literacy were invited to a concept-mapping procedure consisting of two card sorting tasks. Patients ranked 60 outcomes, which are often found in literature in relation to self-management, to the level that was important for themselves. Means were calculated for each outcome and domain, and differences within the group were analyzed.

RESULTS

For patients with limited health literacy, satisfaction with care is the most important outcome domain. This domain includes overall satisfaction, the communication with health care providers, the provision of information and trust. At an outcome level, outcomes related to symptom management and improving competences to self-management scored very high. No differences between patient groups for age and sex were found.

CONCLUSION

Chronically ill patients with limited health literacy prefer a wide variety of outcomes for their self-management. Next to health related outcomes, patients mostly prefer to work on their competences for self-management. For health care professionals, acting on these patient preferences and building a solid relationship will enhance successful self-management.

摘要

背景

对于许多慢性病患者来说,自我管理疾病是困难的。对于健康素养有限的人来说,这可能尤其如此,因为他们在日常疾病管理中面临额外的挑战。研究表明,当自我管理支持根据患者的需求和偏好进行定制时,效果最佳。因此,本研究探讨了健康素养有限的慢性病患者对自我管理结果的偏好。

方法

共邀请 35 名健康素养有限的患者参加概念映射程序,该程序包括两项卡片分类任务。患者将 60 种与自我管理相关的结果按照对自己重要的程度进行排序。为每个结果和领域计算平均值,并分析组内的差异。

结果

对于健康素养有限的患者来说,对护理的满意度是最重要的结果领域。该领域包括总体满意度、与医疗保健提供者的沟通、信息提供和信任。在结果层面上,与症状管理和提高自我管理能力相关的结果得分非常高。未发现年龄和性别组之间存在差异。

结论

健康素养有限的慢性病患者对自我管理的结果有广泛的偏好。除了与健康相关的结果外,患者还大多希望提高自我管理的能力。对于医疗保健专业人员来说,关注这些患者的偏好并建立稳固的关系将有助于成功的自我管理。

相似文献

1
Preferences Regarding Self-Management Intervention Outcomes of Dutch Chronically Ill Patients With Limited Health Literacy.荷兰健康素养有限的慢性病患者对自我管理干预结果的偏好。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 11;10:842462. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.842462. eCollection 2022.
2
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
3
Co-Creation of a Multi-Component Health Literacy Intervention Targeting Both Patients with Mild to Severe Chronic Kidney Disease and Health Care Professionals.多组分健康素养干预措施的共同制定,该措施针对轻度至重度慢性肾脏病患者和医疗保健专业人员。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 18;18(24):13354. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413354.
4
The importance of health literacy for self-management: A scoping review of reviews.健康素养对自我管理的重要性:综述的综述。
Chronic Illn. 2022 Jun;18(2):234-254. doi: 10.1177/17423953211035472. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
5
Positive Outcomes of a Comprehensive Health Literacy Communication Training for Health Professionals in Three European Countries: A Multi-centre Pre-post Intervention Study.三项欧洲国家健康专业人员综合健康素养沟通培训的积极成果:一项多中心前后干预研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 15;16(20):3923. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203923.
6
The effect of health literacy and self-management efficacy on the health-related quality of life of hypertensive patients in a western rural area of China: a cross-sectional study.健康素养和自我管理效能对中国西部农村地区高血压患者健康相关生活质量的影响:一项横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jul 1;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0551-9.
7
Self-management interventions for chronically ill patients with limited health literacy: A descriptive analysis.针对健康素养有限的慢性病患者的自我管理干预措施:描述性分析
Chronic Illn. 2024 Dec;20(4):578-604. doi: 10.1177/17423953231181410. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
8
Insights into how Malaysian adults with limited health literacy self-manage and live with asthma: A Photovoice qualitative study.马来西亚有限健康素养的成年人如何自我管理和应对哮喘的深入了解:一项摄影访谈定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):163-176. doi: 10.1111/hex.13360. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
9
Health literacy, nutrition knowledge, and health care transition readiness in youth with chronic kidney disease or hypertension: A cross-sectional study.青少年慢性肾脏病或高血压患者的健康素养、营养知识和医疗保健过渡准备情况:一项横断面研究。
J Child Health Care. 2020 Jun;24(2):246-259. doi: 10.1177/1367493519831493. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
10
A systematic review of interventions addressing limited health literacy to improve asthma self-management.一项针对解决健康素养有限问题以改善哮喘自我管理的干预措施的系统评价。
J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010427. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010428.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations of Mental Health Issues with Health Literacy and Vaccination Readiness against COVID-19 in Long-Term Care Facilities-A Cross-Sectional Analysis.长期护理机构中心理健康问题与健康素养及 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿的关联——一项横断面分析
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Feb 20;14(3):432-446. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14030029.

本文引用的文献

1
The importance of health literacy for self-management: A scoping review of reviews.健康素养对自我管理的重要性:综述的综述。
Chronic Illn. 2022 Jun;18(2):234-254. doi: 10.1177/17423953211035472. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
2
Talking the same language on patient empowerment: Development and content validation of a taxonomy of self-management interventions for chronic conditions.在患者赋权方面使用同一种语言:慢性病自我管理干预措施分类法的制定和内容验证。
Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1626-1638. doi: 10.1111/hex.13303. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
3
The Perspectives of Patients with Chronic Diseases and Their Caregivers on Self-Management Interventions: A Scoping Review of Reviews.慢性病患者及其照护者对自我管理干预措施的看法:系统评价综述。
Patient. 2021 Nov;14(6):719-740. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00514-2. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
4
Self-management interventions for adults living with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): The development of a Core Outcome Set for COMPAR-EU project.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)成人自我管理干预措施:COMPAR-EU 项目核心结局集的制定。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 1;16(3):e0247522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247522. eCollection 2021.
5
Work in Progress: A Report on Health Literacy in Denmark and the Netherlands.进行中的工作:丹麦和荷兰健康素养报告
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 25;269:202-211. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200033.
6
Facilitators and Barriers to the Development of Health Literacy Capacities Over Time for Self-Management.促进和阻碍健康素养能力随时间发展以进行自我管理的因素。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2020 May 8;4(2):e104-e118. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20200221-01.
7
Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU): a research protocol.比较欧洲四种重点慢性病自我管理干预措施的有效性和成本效益(COMPAR-EU):研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 19;10(1):e034680. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034680.
8
Patient Perspectives to Inform a Health Literacy Educational Program: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.从患者视角出发的健康素养教育项目:系统评价和定性研究的主题综合分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 5;16(21):4300. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214300.
9
Prevalence of limited health literacy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review.2 型糖尿病患者有限健康素养的流行率:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 May 7;14(5):e0216402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216402. eCollection 2019.
10
Patient-important outcomes and core outcome sets: increased attention needed!患者重要结局与核心结局集:需要更多关注!
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):408-410. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 23.