Hidalgo Oliver
Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Z Relig Ges Polit. 2022;6(1):161-187. doi: 10.1007/s41682-022-00117-0. Epub 2022 May 24.
The important debate on Israel-centered antisemitism has currently reached an impasse. In order to contribute to the objectification of the academic and public discussion, this article proposes a differentiation between subjectively conscious and unconscious anti-semitic resentments and reformulates this distinction in terms of democratic theory. Against the background of a concept of democracy including the complex coexistence of unity and plurality in democratic societies as well as the fundamental tension between religion and popular sovereignty, it becomes available to reflect the state of Israel as a Jewish collective in a non-antisemitic way, while illustrating relevant aporias in the Middle East conflict at the same time. On this basis, a well-balanced discussion of the apartheid accusation against the Israeli government is as possible as a plausible assessment of the Palestinian boycott movement BDS.
当前，围绕以以色列为中心的反犹主义展开的重要辩论陷入了僵局。为推动学术和公众讨论的客观化，本文提议区分主观有意识和无意识的反犹怨恨，并从民主理论的角度重新阐述这一区别。在民主概念的背景下，民主社会中存在着统一与多元的复杂共存以及宗教与人民主权之间的根本张力，我们可以以非反犹的方式将以色列国视为一个犹太集体，同时阐明中东冲突中的相关困境。在此基础上，对针对以色列政府的种族隔离指控进行平衡的讨论，以及对巴勒斯坦抵制运动“抵制、撤资和制裁”（BDS）进行合理评估都是可行的。
