Mahjoub Tarek, Krafft Emilie, Garnier Léa, Mignard Amélie, Hugnet Christophe, Lefebvre Sébastien, Fourel Isabelle, Benoit Etienne, Lattard Virginie
USC1233 RS2GP, INRAe, VetAgro Sup, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Biochemistry, University of Manouba, National School of Veterinary Medicine of Sidi Thabet, Ariana, Tunisia.
Front Toxicol. 2022 May 11;4:907892. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2022.907892. eCollection 2022.
Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) are important tools for controlling rodent pests, but they also pose a health threat to non-target species. ARs are one of the most common causes of pet poisoning. However, exposure of domestic animals to subclinical doses of ARs is poorly documented. To study the random exposure of dogs and cats to ARs, feces from animals showing no clinical signs of rodenticide poisoning were collected from a network of French and Belgian veterinarians. We analyzed fresh feces from 304 dogs and 289 cats by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. This study showed a limited prevalence of AR exposure in dogs and cats of 2.6 and 4.5% respectively. In both species, access to the outdoors is a risk factor for ARs exposure. In contrast, the sex of the animals did not affect the ARs exposure status. The observation of the ratio of cis and trans isomers suggested primary exposure in dogs, but also in some cats. While primary exposure in dogs appears to be related to the use of ARs as plant protection products, primary exposure in cats may be malicious, as warfarin, an anticoagulant formerly used as a rodenticide and now used only in humans, was found in 4 of 13 exposed cats. Secondary exposure may also occur in cats.Our study showed reduced exposure in dogs and cats, compared to wildlife, which often has high exposure, especially in areas where rodent control is important.
抗凝血灭鼠剂(ARs)是控制啮齿类害虫的重要工具,但它们也对非目标物种构成健康威胁。ARs是宠物中毒最常见的原因之一。然而,家畜接触亚临床剂量ARs的情况鲜有记录。为了研究犬猫随机接触ARs的情况,我们从法国和比利时的兽医网络中收集了无灭鼠剂中毒临床症状的动物粪便。我们采用液相色谱-串联质谱法分析了304只犬和289只猫的新鲜粪便。这项研究表明,犬猫接触ARs的比例有限,分别为2.6%和4.5%。在这两个物种中,户外活动是接触ARs的一个风险因素。相比之下,动物的性别并不影响ARs的接触状况。顺式和反式异构体比例的观察表明,犬类存在初次接触情况,部分猫类也存在这种情况。犬类的初次接触似乎与将ARs用作植物保护产品有关,而猫类的初次接触可能是恶意投毒,因为在13只接触ARs的猫中有4只检测出了华法林,华法林曾用作灭鼠剂,现在仅用于人类。猫类也可能发生二次接触。我们的研究表明,与野生动物相比,犬猫接触ARs的情况较少,野生动物的接触率通常较高,尤其是在啮齿动物控制很重要的地区。