• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据新型急性心肌梗死风险分层(nARS)系统进行分层的患者的长期临床结局比较。

Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Stratified by a Novel Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification (nARS) System.

作者信息

Ohashi Jumpei, Sakakura Kenichi, Jinnouchi Hiroyuki, Taniguchi Yousuke, Tsukui Takunori, Watanabe Yusuke, Yamamoto Kei, Seguchi Masaru, Wada Hiroshi, Fujita Hideo

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University.

出版信息

Circ J. 2022 Sep 22;86(10):1519-1526. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0188. Epub 2022 May 31.

DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0188
PMID:35650118
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As severity of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) varies widely, several risk stratifications for AMI have been reported. We have introduced a novel AMI risk stratification system linked to a rehabilitation program (novel AMI risk stratification; nARS), which stratified AMI patients into low (L)-, intermediate (I)-, and high (H)-risk groups. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes in patients with AMI among L-, I-, H-risk groups.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 773 AMI patients, and assigned them into the L-risk group (n=332), the I-risk group (n=164), and the H-risk group (n=277). The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, readmission for heart failure, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization after the discharge of index admission. The median follow-up duration was 686 days. MACE was most frequently observed in the H-risk group (39.4%), followed by the I-risk group (23.2%), and least in the L-risk group (19.9%) (P<0.001). The multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that the H-risk was significantly associated with MACE (HR 2.166, 95% CI 1.543-3.041, P<0.001) after controlling for multiple confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

H-risk according to nARS was significantly associated with long-term adverse events after hospital discharge for patients with AMI. These results support the validity of nARS as a risk marker for long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

由于急性心肌梗死(AMI)的严重程度差异很大,已有多种针对AMI的风险分层报道。我们引入了一种与康复计划相关的新型AMI风险分层系统(新型AMI风险分层;nARS),该系统将AMI患者分为低(L)、中(I)、高(H)风险组。这项回顾性研究的目的是比较L、I、H风险组中AMI患者的长期临床结局。

方法与结果

本研究纳入773例AMI患者,将他们分为L风险组(n = 332)、I风险组(n = 164)和H风险组(n = 277)。主要终点是主要心血管事件(MACE),定义为全因死亡、因心力衰竭再次入院、非致命性心肌梗死以及首次入院出院后靶血管血运重建的综合情况。中位随访时间为686天。MACE在H风险组中最常见(39.4%),其次是I风险组(23.2%),在L风险组中最少见(19.9%)(P<0.001)。多因素Cox风险分析显示,在控制多个混杂因素后,H风险与MACE显著相关(HR 2.166,95%CI 1.543 - 3.041,P<0.001)。

结论

根据nARS,H风险与AMI患者出院后的长期不良事件显著相关。这些结果支持nARS作为长期结局风险标志物的有效性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Stratified by a Novel Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification (nARS) System.根据新型急性心肌梗死风险分层(nARS)系统进行分层的患者的长期临床结局比较。
Circ J. 2022 Sep 22;86(10):1519-1526. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0188. Epub 2022 May 31.
2
Further Validation of a Novel Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification (nARS) System for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死新型风险分层(nARS)系统在急性心肌梗死患者中的进一步验证
Int Heart J. 2020 May 30;61(3):463-469. doi: 10.1536/ihj.19-678. Epub 2020 May 15.
3
Clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction according to a novel stratification system linked to a rehabilitation program.根据与康复计划相关联的新型分层系统评估急性心肌梗死的临床转归。
J Cardiol. 2018 Sep;72(3):227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
Angiographic Coronary Calcification: A Simple Predictor of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.冠状动脉钙化的血管造影表现:急性心肌梗死患者长期临床结局的简单预测因子。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Aug 1;30(8):990-1001. doi: 10.5551/jat.63856. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
5
Association of collateral flow with clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.侧支循环血流与急性心肌梗死患者临床结局的关系。
Heart Vessels. 2022 Sep;37(9):1496-1505. doi: 10.1007/s00380-022-02054-7. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
6
Association of Increased Pulse Wave Velocity With Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Preserved Ankle-Brachial Index After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后踝臂指数正常患者脉搏波速度升高与长期临床结局的关系。
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Oct;31(10):1360-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.05.044. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
7
Appetite Predicts Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.食欲可预测急性心肌梗死患者的长期临床结局。
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 22;12(19):6134. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196134.
8
Vitamin D and prognosis in acute myocardial infarction.维生素D与急性心肌梗死的预后
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.030. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
9
Novel Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification (nARS) System Reduces the Length of Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction.新型急性心肌梗死风险分层(nARS)系统可缩短急性心肌梗死患者的住院时间。
Circ J. 2019 Apr 25;83(5):1039-1046. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-1221. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
10
Association of Asymptomatic Low Ankle-Brachial Index with Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients after Acute Myocardial Infarction.无症状性低踝臂指数与急性心肌梗死后患者长期临床结局的关系。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 Jul 1;29(7):992-1000. doi: 10.5551/jat.62998. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction among preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction.射血分数保留、中等范围和降低的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者临床结局的比较。
Heart Vessels. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1007/s00380-025-02558-y.
2
Comparison of clinical outcomes between direct and indirect transfer in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接转运与间接转运的临床结局比较。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 Apr;40(2):277-286. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01075-5. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
3
No standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in acute myocardial infarction: prevalence, pathophysiology, and prognosis.
急性心肌梗死中无标准可调节心血管危险因素:患病率、病理生理学和预后。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Oct;39(4):403-411. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01022-4. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
4
Impact of the Japanese Version of High Bleeding Risk Criteria on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.日本版高出血风险标准对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者临床结局的影响。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2024 Jun 1;31(6):917-930. doi: 10.5551/jat.64445. Epub 2023 Dec 14.