• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型急性心肌梗死风险分层(nARS)系统可缩短急性心肌梗死患者的住院时间。

Novel Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification (nARS) System Reduces the Length of Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University.

出版信息

Circ J. 2019 Apr 25;83(5):1039-1046. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-1221. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-18-1221
PMID:30890684
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The novel Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Risk Stratification (nARS) system was recently developed based on original criteria. The use of nARS may reduce the length of hospitalization.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We allocated 560 AMI patients into the pre-nARS group (before adopting nARS) or the nARS group. Patients in the nARS group were subdivided into the low (L), intermediate (I), and high (H) risk groups, whereas patients in the pre-nARS group were subdivided into the equivalent L (eL), equivalent I (eI), or equivalent H (eH) risk groups based on the nARS criteria. Length of coronary care unit (CCU) stay was significantly shorter in the nARS group (2.8±3.5 days) compared with the pre-nARS group (4.4±5.4 days; P<0.001). Length of hospital stay was also shorter in the nARS group (9.4±8.9 days) compared with the pre-nARS group (13.4±12.8 days; P<0.001). Length of CCU stay was significantly shorter in the L (1.1±1.0 days), I (2.8±3.5 days), and H (5.0±4.8 days) risk groups compared with corresponding eL (2.2±1.1 days), eI (4.4±5.4 days), and eH (7.1±7.8 days) risk groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Length of CCU and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the nARS group compared with the pre-nARS group. The use of nARS may save medical resources in the treatment of AMI in the regional health-care system.

摘要

背景

新型急性心肌梗死(AMI)风险分层(nARS)系统是基于原始标准建立的。使用 nARS 可能会缩短住院时间。

方法和结果

我们将 560 例 AMI 患者分为 nARS 前组(采用 nARS 前)和 nARS 组。nARS 组患者分为低(L)、中(I)和高(H)风险组,而 nARS 前组患者则根据 nARS 标准分为等效低(eL)、等效 I(eI)或等效 H(eH)风险组。nARS 组患者的冠心病监护病房(CCU)住院时间明显短于 nARS 前组(分别为 2.8±3.5 天和 4.4±5.4 天;P<0.001)。nARS 组患者的住院时间也明显短于 nARS 前组(分别为 9.4±8.9 天和 13.4±12.8 天;P<0.001)。L(1.1±1.0 天)、I(2.8±3.5 天)和 H(5.0±4.8 天)风险组患者的 CCU 住院时间明显短于相应的 eL(2.2±1.1 天)、eI(4.4±5.4 天)和 eH(7.1±7.8 天)风险组。

结论

与 nARS 前组相比,nARS 组患者的 CCU 和住院时间明显缩短。在区域医疗保健系统中治疗 AMI 时,使用 nARS 可能会节省医疗资源。

相似文献

1
Novel Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification (nARS) System Reduces the Length of Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction.新型急性心肌梗死风险分层(nARS)系统可缩短急性心肌梗死患者的住院时间。
Circ J. 2019 Apr 25;83(5):1039-1046. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-1221. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
2
Further Validation of a Novel Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification (nARS) System for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死新型风险分层(nARS)系统在急性心肌梗死患者中的进一步验证
Int Heart J. 2020 May 30;61(3):463-469. doi: 10.1536/ihj.19-678. Epub 2020 May 15.
3
Clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction according to a novel stratification system linked to a rehabilitation program.根据与康复计划相关联的新型分层系统评估急性心肌梗死的临床转归。
J Cardiol. 2018 Sep;72(3):227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Stratified by a Novel Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification (nARS) System.根据新型急性心肌梗死风险分层(nARS)系统进行分层的患者的长期临床结局比较。
Circ J. 2022 Sep 22;86(10):1519-1526. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0188. Epub 2022 May 31.
5
Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction reduces CCU stay in patients 80 or older.经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死可减少80岁及以上患者的冠心病监护病房住院时间。
Int Heart J. 2012;53(2):79-84. doi: 10.1536/ihj.53.79.
6
Epidemiology of acute myocardial infarction in the Italian CCU network: the BLITZ study.意大利冠心病监护病房网络中急性心肌梗死的流行病学:闪电研究
Eur Heart J. 2003 Sep;24(18):1616-29. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00278-1.
7
What have the new definition of acute myocardial infarction and the introduction of troponin measurement done to the coronary care unit? Impacts on admission rate, length of stay, case mix and mortality.急性心肌梗死的新定义以及肌钙蛋白检测的引入对冠心病监护病房产生了哪些影响?对入院率、住院时间、病例组合和死亡率的影响。
Cardiology. 2004;102(3):171-6. doi: 10.1159/000080487. Epub 2004 Aug 27.
8
Coronary care unit utilization in Hamilton, Ontario, a city of 375,000 people.安大略省汉密尔顿市(人口37.5万)冠心病监护病房的使用情况。
Can J Cardiol. 1988 Jan-Feb;4(1):25-32.
9
[Clinical characteristics, management, and prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction not admitted to the coronary care unit. Usefulness of an intermediate care unit as the initial admission site].[未入住冠心病监护病房的急性心肌梗死患者的临床特征、治疗及预后。中间护理单元作为初始收治地点的实用性]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2003 Mar;56(3):262-70. doi: 10.1016/s0300-8932(03)76862-6.
10
[Identification of patients with acute myocardial infarction that may be discharged early: prospective evaluation with simple clinical and instrumental indicators].[急性心肌梗死患者早期出院可能性的识别:采用简单临床和仪器指标的前瞻性评估]
Ital Heart J Suppl. 2001 Jul;2(7):775-82.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlations of visfatin with severity of acute myocardial infarction, cardiovascular risk factors and atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention.内脂素与急性心肌梗死严重程度、心血管危险因素及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后房颤的相关性。
J Med Biochem. 2023 Oct 27;42(4):650-657. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-41963.
2
Association of Ankle Brachial Index with Clinical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Aortic Aneurysm.踝臂指数与主动脉瘤患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后临床结局的相关性。
Intern Med. 2021 Sep 1;60(17):2733-2740. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.6816-20. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
Comparison of clinical outcomes and left ventricular remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction between patients with and without diabetes mellitus.
比较合并和不合并糖尿病的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床结局和左心室重构。
Heart Vessels. 2021 Oct;36(10):1445-1456. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01827-w. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
4
Comparison of long-term outcomes after trans-catheter aortic valve implantation between patients primarily diagnosed by cardiac murmur and those diagnosed by other reasons.经心脏杂音初诊与其他原因初诊的经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的长期结局比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0247588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247588. eCollection 2021.
5
Difference in the in-hospital prognosis between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with high Killip class: Data from the Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.伴有高Killip分级的ST段抬高型心肌梗死与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院内预后的差异:来自日本急性心肌梗死注册研究的数据
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Jun 30;10(5):503–512. doi: 10.1177/2048872620926681. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
Determinants of Insufficient Optimal Medical Therapy after Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后最佳药物治疗不足的决定因素。
Intern Med. 2020 Jun 15;59(12):1489-1495. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4016-19. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
7
Atorvastatin combined with routine therapy on HIF-1, VEGF concentration and cardiac function in rats with acute myocardial infarction.阿托伐他汀联合常规治疗对急性心肌梗死大鼠缺氧诱导因子-1、血管内皮生长因子浓度及心功能的影响
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Mar;19(3):2053-2058. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8438. Epub 2020 Jan 27.