Suppr超能文献

根据与康复计划相关联的新型分层系统评估急性心肌梗死的临床转归。

Clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction according to a novel stratification system linked to a rehabilitation program.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2018 Sep;72(3):227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A risk classification of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) linked to a rehabilitation program has not been established.

METHODS

We allocated 292 patients with AMI into the low- (L) (n=108), intermediate- (I) (n=72), and high- (H) (n=112) risk groups according to our original risk classification. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal AMI, stent thrombosis, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. The mean follow-up period was 252 days.

RESULTS

The length of coronary care unit (CCU) stay and hospital stay was shortest in the L-risk group (CCU stay, 1.0±1.0 days; hospital stay, 5.6±3.2 days), followed by the I-risk group (CCU stay, 2.3±1.8 days; hospital stay, 8.1±2.7 days), and longest in the H-risk group (CCU stay, 5.1±5.0 days; hospital stay, 14.6±12.6 days) (p<0.001). MACE were most frequently observed in the H-risk group (26.8%), followed by the I-risk group (5.6%), and least in the L-risk group (1.9%) (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The lengths of hospital stay and CCU stay were significantly shortest in the L-risk group, followed by the I-risk group, and longest in the H-risk group. MACE were most frequently observed in the H-risk group, followed by the I-risk group, and least in the L-risk group. These results support the validity of our new classification system.

摘要

背景

与康复计划相关的急性心肌梗死(AMI)风险分类尚未建立。

方法

我们根据原始风险分类将 292 名 AMI 患者分为低(L)(n=108)、中(I)(n=72)和高(H)(n=112)风险组。主要终点是主要不良心脏事件(MACE),定义为心脏死亡、非致命性 AMI、支架血栓形成和缺血驱动的靶血管血运重建的复合事件。平均随访时间为 252 天。

结果

L 风险组的冠心病监护病房(CCU)停留时间和住院时间最短(CCU 停留时间 1.0±1.0 天;住院时间 5.6±3.2 天),其次是 I 风险组(CCU 停留时间 2.3±1.8 天;住院时间 8.1±2.7 天),H 风险组最长(CCU 停留时间 5.1±5.0 天;住院时间 14.6±12.6 天)(p<0.001)。MACE 最常见于 H 风险组(26.8%),其次是 I 风险组(5.6%),最少见于 L 风险组(1.9%)(p<0.001)。

结论

L 风险组的住院时间和 CCU 停留时间明显最短,其次是 I 风险组,H 风险组最长。MACE 最常见于 H 风险组,其次是 I 风险组,最少见于 L 风险组。这些结果支持我们新的分类系统的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验