• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我(不)想使用假药:消费者对假药态度的影响因素初探。

I (Don't) want to consume counterfeit medicines: exploratory study on the antecedents of consumer attitudes toward counterfeit medicines.

机构信息

School of Journalism and Communication, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.

School of Communication, Webster University, St. Louis, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 1;22(1):1094. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13529-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-13529-7
PMID:35650557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9158175/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Substandard and falsified medicine (SFM) sales (an estimated > $200 billion) has become one of the worlds' fastest growing criminal enterprises. It presents an enormous public health and safety challenge. While the developed world is not precluded from this challenge, studies focus on low-income countries. They emphasize supply chain processes, technological, and legal mechanisms, paying less attention to consumer judgment and decision-making aspects.

METHODS

With attention to the demand side of the counterfeit medicines challenge, this survey of U.S. consumers (n = 427) sheds light on some of the social, psychological, and normative factors that underlie consumers' attitudes, risk perceptions, and purchase intentions.

RESULTS

Consumers who (a) self-report that they know about the problem, (b) are older, (c) view counterfeit medicine consumption as ethical, and (d) think their significant others would approve of them using such products are more inclined to perceive lower risks and have favorable purchase intentions. Risk averseness is also inversely related to the predicted outcomes. Perceived benefit of SFMs is a factor but has no effect when risk perception and aversion, attitudes, and subjective norms are factored into the model that predicts purchase intentions.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that consumer knowledge (albeit in an unexpected direction), people's expectations about what will impress their significant others, their ethical judgments about selling and consuming counterfeits, and their risk-aversion are associated with their decision-making about counterfeit medicines. The study offers insights into a demand-side approach to addressing SFM consumption in the U.S. Implications for public health, consumer safety, and brand advocacy education are discussed.

摘要

背景

劣药和假药的销售(估计超过 2000 亿美元)已成为世界上发展最快的犯罪企业之一。这对公共卫生和安全构成了巨大挑战。虽然发达国家也面临这一挑战,但研究重点是低收入国家。这些研究强调供应链流程、技术和法律机制,而对消费者判断和决策方面关注较少。

方法

本研究关注假药挑战的需求方,对美国消费者(n=427)进行调查,揭示了一些社会、心理和规范因素,这些因素是消费者态度、风险感知和购买意向的基础。

结果

消费者(a)自我报告他们了解这个问题,(b)年龄较大,(c)认为假药消费是合乎道德的,(d)认为他们的重要他人会批准他们使用此类产品,他们更倾向于认为风险较低,购买意向也更积极。风险规避也与预测结果呈反比。SFMs 的预期收益也是一个因素,但当将风险感知和规避、态度和主观规范纳入预测购买意向的模型时,它没有影响。

结论

本研究结果表明,消费者知识(尽管方向出人意料)、人们对重要他人印象的期望、对销售和消费假药的道德判断以及对风险的规避与他们对假药的决策有关。该研究为解决美国 SFM 消费的需求方方法提供了思路。讨论了对公共卫生、消费者安全和品牌宣传教育的影响。

相似文献

1
I (Don't) want to consume counterfeit medicines: exploratory study on the antecedents of consumer attitudes toward counterfeit medicines.我(不)想使用假药:消费者对假药态度的影响因素初探。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 1;22(1):1094. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13529-7.
2
Consumers' Decision-Making Process on Social Commerce Platforms: Online Trust, Perceived Risk, and Purchase Intentions.社交商务平台上消费者的决策过程:在线信任、感知风险与购买意愿
Front Psychol. 2020 May 15;11:890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00890. eCollection 2020.
3
Fighting trafficking of falsified and substandard medicinal products in Russia.打击俄罗斯假药和劣药的非法交易。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S37-40. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150681.
4
A critical review on the availability of substandard and falsified medicines online: Incidence, challenges and perspectives.关于网上不合标准和伪造药品可得性的批判性综述:发生率、挑战与展望。
J Med Access. 2022 Feb 15;6:23992026221074548. doi: 10.1177/23992026221074548. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
Point-of-Care Anti-Counterfeit Medicines Technologies: Awareness and Utilization among Medical Practitioners in Eastern Nigeria.即时护理抗假冒药品技术:尼日利亚东部医疗从业者的认知与应用情况
West Afr J Med. 2021 Nov 30;Vol. 38(11):1029-1035.
6
Substandard and Falsified Medicines: Proposed Methods for Case Finding and Sentinel Surveillance.伪劣药品:案例发现和哨点监测的建议方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 16;7(8):e29309. doi: 10.2196/29309.
7
[Counterfeit medicines--Japan and the world].[假药——日本与世界]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2014;134(2):213-22. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.13-00230-3.
8
Counterfeit drug demand: perceptions of policy makers and community pharmacists in Sudan.假冒药品需求:苏丹政策制定者和社区药剂师的看法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 May-Jun;9(3):302-10. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
9
Perceptions and practices of pharmaceutical wholesalers surrounding counterfeit medicines in a developing country: a baseline survey.发展中国家医药批发商对假药的认知与实践:基线调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Nov 11;11:306. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-306.
10
Legal aspects of counteracting the trafficking of falsified medicines in the european union.欧盟打击假药 trafficking 的法律方面。(原句中“trafficking”后似乎少了关键内容,比如“trafficking in”之类,导致“假药trafficking”表述不太完整准确)
Wiad Lek. 2017;70(4):843-849.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices and demand-side interventions for combating substandard and falsified medicines: a scoping review.评估对抗不合格和假药的知识、态度、行为及需求方干预措施:一项范围综述
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Sep 12;18(1):2550369. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2550369. eCollection 2025.
2
Perception of falsified and counterfeit medicines among adults living in Mexico City and the metropolitan area: an underappreciated health risk.墨西哥城及大都市区成年人对假药和伪造药品的认知:一种未得到充分重视的健康风险。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 29;16:1654822. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1654822. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of substandard, falsified, unlicensed and unregistered medicine sampling studies: a focus on context, prevalence, and quality.劣药、假药、无许可证和未经注册药品抽样研究的系统评价:关注背景、流行程度和质量。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Aug;5(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002393.
2
The health consequences of falsified medicines- A study of the published literature.假药的健康危害——已发表文献研究。
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Dec;23(12):1294-1303. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13161. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
3
Consumers Turning to the Internet Pharmacy Market: Cross-Sectional Study on the Frequency and Attitudes of Hungarian Patients Purchasing Medications Online.消费者转向互联网药房市场:匈牙利患者在线购买药品频率及态度的横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 22;20(8):e11115. doi: 10.2196/11115.
4
Combating Sale of Counterfeit and Falsified Medicines Online: A Losing Battle.打击网上假冒伪劣药品销售:一场必败之仗。
Front Pharmacol. 2017 May 16;8:268. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00268. eCollection 2017.
5
Availability and quality of illegitimate somatropin products obtained from the Internet.互联网非法获得的生长激素产品的供应和质量。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Feb;39(1):78-87. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0398-y. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
6
Importation of generic hepatitis C therapies: bridging the gap between price and access in high-income countries.通用型丙型肝炎治疗药物的引进:弥合高收入国家价格与可及性之间的差距。
Lancet. 2017 Mar 25;389(10075):1268-1272. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32051-7. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
7
Public health interventions to protect against falsified medicines: a systematic review of international, national and local policies.防范假药的公共卫生干预措施:对国际、国家和地方政策的系统评价
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Dec;31(10):1448-1466. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw062. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
8
Quantitative analysis of sildenafil and tadalafil in various fake drugs recently distributed in Korea.近期在韩国流通的各类假药中昔多芬和他达拉非的定量分析。
J Forensic Sci. 2012 Nov;57(6):1637-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02164.x. Epub 2012 May 23.
9
Counterfeit or substandard antimicrobial drugs: a review of the scientific evidence.假冒或不合格抗菌药物:科学证据综述
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Aug;60(2):214-36. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm109. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
10
Prevalence of pathological Internet use among university students and correlations with self-esteem, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), and disinhibition.大学生病理性网络使用的患病率及其与自尊、一般健康问卷(GHQ)和去抑制的相关性。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005 Dec;8(6):562-70. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.562.