Suppr超能文献

关节腔内注射透明质酸治疗膝骨关节炎的作用及有效性:一项系统评价

Role and Effectiveness of Intra-articular Injection of Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Chavda Sumant, Rabbani Syed Arman, Wadhwa Tarun

机构信息

Orthopedics, Ras Al Khaimah (RAK) Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, ARE.

Pharmacology, Ras Al Khaimah (RAK) Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, ARE.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Apr 26;14(4):e24503. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24503. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease that causes persistent joint pain and stiffness of mainly the large peripheral weight-bearing joints. It is a leading cause of functional disability and poor quality of life. Various modalities of therapy are recommended by different research organizations at different stages of OA including non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and surgical interventions. Intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) is widely used for over three decades in the treatment of OA. However controversies exist regarding its safety and efficacy, the number of injections and courses, type of preparation, duration of its effects, and combining it with other drugs or molecules. This study aimed to review the most recent data available in the published literature to address these. Electronic databases like Medline, Embase, ProQuest, and Google Scholar were searched for articles using keywords, intraarticular injections, hyaluronic acid, and osteoarthritis knee. The review was carried out as per PRISMA guidelines. Thirty-eight randomized control trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of HA were included in the systematic review. Out of the 38 studies, 22 (57.9%) were double-blind, eight (21%) single-blind, three (7.9%) non-blind, four (10%) with simple randomization, and one (2.7%) was open-labeled. Total 5,025 patients were included in these studies. The mean age of the patients was 60.28 years and the osteoarthritis grade of the knee joint was 1 to 3. HA was studied as a test preparation in 19 (50%) while in another 19 (50%) it was studied as a control. In 24 (63.2%) studies, HA was used as high molecular weight preparation in eight (21%) as low molecular weight preparation while in six studies the information was not available. HA was used as a standalone preparation in 31 studies, in two studies it was injected with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and with either low-level laser therapy (LLLT), triamcinolone (TA), betamethasone (CS), poly deoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) or dexamethasone (DX) in one study each. In the majority of the studies, HA was given as a single injection (52.6% studies) or weekly three injections (28.9% studies). In 13.2 %, it was given as weekly 5 injections and in 5.3% as weekly two injections. IA-HA injections have a limited role in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in those patients who do not have sufficient pain relief with topical or oral medication and physical therapy. It is safe and effective except for minor side effects such as local pain and swelling lasting for a few days. Severe allergic reactions are extremely rare. They provide adequate pain relief and functional improvement for up to six months irrespective of a number of injections and type of preparations used. The combination formulations with corticosteroids or PRP or MSCs show better results than HA alone. Combining HA with newer molecules such as peptides or diclofenac for sustained and disease-modifying effects requires more studies in the future.

摘要

骨关节炎(OA)是一种退行性关节疾病,主要导致大的外周负重关节出现持续性关节疼痛和僵硬。它是导致功能残疾和生活质量低下的主要原因。不同的研究组织针对OA的不同阶段推荐了多种治疗方式,包括非药物、药物和手术干预。关节内注射透明质酸(HA)在OA治疗中已广泛应用三十多年。然而,关于其安全性和有效性、注射次数和疗程、制剂类型、作用持续时间以及与其他药物或分子联合使用等方面仍存在争议。本研究旨在回顾已发表文献中的最新数据以解决这些问题。使用关键词“关节内注射”“透明质酸”和“膝骨关节炎”在Medline、Embase、ProQuest和谷歌学术等电子数据库中检索文章。该综述按照PRISMA指南进行。38项研究关节内注射HA疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(RCT)纳入了系统评价。在这38项研究中,22项(57.9%)为双盲,8项(21%)为单盲,3项(7.9%)为非盲,4项(10%)为简单随机分组,1项(2.7%)为开放标签。这些研究共纳入5025例患者。患者的平均年龄为60.28岁,膝关节骨关节炎分级为1至3级。19项研究(50%)将HA作为试验制剂,另外19项(50%)将其作为对照。在24项(63.2%)研究中,HA被用作高分子量制剂,8项(21%)为低分子量制剂,但有6项研究未提供相关信息。31项研究中HA作为单一制剂使用;2项研究中HA与富血小板血浆(PRP)联合注射;在1项研究中HA分别与低强度激光治疗(LLLT)、曲安奈德(TA)、倍他米松(CS)、聚脱氧核糖核苷酸(PDRN)或地塞米松(DX)联合使用。在大多数研究中,HA采用单次注射(52.6%的研究)或每周3次注射(28.9%的研究)。13.2%的研究采用每周5次注射,5.3%的研究采用每周2次注射方式。对于那些局部或口服药物以及物理治疗无法充分缓解疼痛的膝骨关节炎患者,关节内注射HA的治疗作用有限。除了持续数天的局部疼痛和肿胀等轻微副作用外,它是安全有效的;严重过敏反应极为罕见。无论注射次数和使用的制剂类型如何,它们都能提供长达6个月的充分疼痛缓解和功能改善。与单独使用HA相比,HA与皮质类固醇、PRP或间充质干细胞(MSCs)的联合制剂显示出更好的效果。未来需要更多研究来探讨HA与肽或双氯芬酸等新型分子联合使用以获得持续和改善病情的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11fc/9135165/25a0f90d6af8/cureus-0014-00000024503-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验