Suppr超能文献

一项随机对照单盲研究表明,羊膜悬浮同种异体移植注射在改善膝关节骨关节炎症状方面优于透明质酸和生理盐水对照。

A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Study Demonstrating Superiority of Amniotic Suspension Allograft Injection Over Hyaluronic Acid and Saline Control for Modification of Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms.

作者信息

Farr Jack, Gomoll Andreas H, Yanke Adam B, Strauss Eric J, Mowry Katie C

机构信息

Knee Preservation and Cartilage Restoration Center, OrthoIndy, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2019 Nov;32(11):1143-1154. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1696672. Epub 2019 Sep 18.

Abstract

Placental-derived tissues are a known source of anti-inflammatory and immune modulating factors. Published pilot data on amniotic suspension allograft (ASA) for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) demonstrated safety and trends for improved pain and function. A multicenter randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of symptom modulation with ASA compared with saline and hyaluronic acid (HA) in subjects with knee OA. A total of 200 subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to ASA, HA, or saline, with subjects blinded to their allocation. Changes from baseline of patient-reported outcomes (PROs)-EQ-5D-5L, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS), Tegner, and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE)-were compared between groups. Patients reporting unacceptable pain at 3 months were considered treatment failures and withdrawn from the study. Statistical analysis was completed by comparing changes in PROs from baseline to 3 and 6 months for all groups. Comparison of demographics between treatment groups showed no significant differences between groups. Patients reporting unacceptable pain at 3 months in each group were ASA (13.2%), HA (68.8%), and saline (75%). Patients receiving ASA demonstrated significantly greater improvements from baseline for overall pain (VAS), KOOS pain, and KOOS-activities of daily living scores compared with those in the HA group (3 months) and both groups (6 months). ASA patients had significantly greater improvements in KOOS symptom scores compared with HA and saline at 3 and 6 months, respectively. OMERACT-OARSI responder rates for ASA, HA, and saline groups were 69.1, 39.1, and 42.6%, respectively ( = 0.0007). Subjects receiving ASA treatment showed greater improvements in PROs and fewer patients reported unacceptable pain compared with HA and saline. The evidence presented in this Level I Randomized Controlled Trial suggests that ASA injection is an effective treatment for the nonoperative management of symptomatic knee OA.

摘要

胎盘来源的组织是已知的抗炎和免疫调节因子来源。已发表的关于羊膜悬浮同种异体移植物(ASA)治疗骨关节炎(OA)的初步数据证明了其安全性以及疼痛和功能改善的趋势。一项多中心随机对照试验旨在评估与生理盐水和透明质酸(HA)相比,ASA对膝骨关节炎患者症状调节的疗效。总共200名受试者按1:1:1随机分为ASA组、HA组或生理盐水组,受试者对其分组情况不知情。比较了各组患者报告结局(PROs)——EQ-5D-5L、膝关节骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、特格纳量表和单项评估数值评定(SANE)——相对于基线的变化。在3个月时报告疼痛无法接受的患者被视为治疗失败并退出研究。通过比较所有组从基线到3个月和6个月时PROs的变化完成统计分析。治疗组之间的人口统计学比较显示组间无显著差异。每组中在3个月时报告疼痛无法接受的患者比例分别为:ASA组(13.2%)、HA组(68.8%)和生理盐水组(75%)。与HA组(3个月)和两组(6个月)相比,接受ASA治疗的患者在总体疼痛(VAS)、KOOS疼痛和KOOS日常生活活动评分方面相对于基线有显著更大的改善。在3个月和6个月时,ASA组患者的KOOS症状评分相对于HA组和生理盐水组分别有显著更大的改善。ASA组、HA组和生理盐水组的OMERACT-OARSI应答率分别为69.1%、39.1%和42.6%(=0.0007)。与HA组和生理盐水组相比,接受ASA治疗的受试者在PROs方面有更大改善,报告疼痛无法接受的患者更少。这项I级随机对照试验提供的证据表明,ASA注射是有症状的膝骨关节炎非手术治疗的有效方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验