380家国际儿科重症监护病房的通气解放实践
Ventilation Liberation Practices Among 380 International PICUs.
作者信息
Loberger Jeremy M, Campbell Caitlin M, Colleti José, Borasino Santiago, Abu-Sultaneh Samer, Khemani Robinder G
机构信息
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, Birmingham, AL.
出版信息
Crit Care Explor. 2022 May 27;4(6):e0710. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000710. eCollection 2022 Jun.
UNLABELLED
- Characterize the prevalence of ventilator liberation protocol use in international PICUs, 2) identify the most commonly used protocol elements, and 3) estimate an international extubation failure rate and use of postextubation noninvasive respiratory support modes.
DESIGN
International cross-sectional study.
SUBJECTS
Nontrainee pediatric medical and cardiac critical care physicians.
SETTING
Electronic survey.
INTERVENTION
None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
Responses represented 380 unique PICUs from 47 different countries. Protocols for Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) practice (50%) and endotracheal tube cuff management (55.8%) were the only protocols used by greater than or equal to 50% of PICUs. Among PICUs screening for SBT eligibility, physicians were most commonly screened (62.7%) with daily frequency (64.2%). Among those with an SBT practice protocol, SBTs were most commonly performed by respiratory therapists/physiotherapists (49.2%) and least commonly by nurses (4.9%). Postextubation respiratory support protocols were not prevalent (28.7%). International practice variation was significant for most practices surveyed. The estimated median international extubation failure was 5% (interquartile range, 2.3-10%). A majority of respondents self-reported use of planned high-flow nasal cannula in less than or equal to 50% (84.2%) and planned noninvasive ventilation in less than or equal to 20% of extubations (81.6%).
CONCLUSIONS
Variability in international pediatric ventilation liberation practice is high, and prevalence of protocol implementation is generally low. There is a need to better understand elements that drive clinical outcomes and opportunity to work on standardizing pediatric ventilation liberation practices worldwide.
未标注
- 描述国际儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中呼吸机撤离方案的使用情况,2) 确定最常用的方案要素,3) 估计国际拔管失败率以及拔管后无创呼吸支持模式的使用情况。
设计
国际横断面研究。
研究对象
非实习儿科医学和心脏重症监护医生。
设置
电子调查。
干预措施
无。
测量指标及主要结果
回复来自47个不同国家的380个独立PICU。自主呼吸试验(SBT)实践方案(50%)和气管插管套囊管理方案(55.8%)是使用率大于或等于50%的PICU所使用的仅有的方案。在对SBT资格进行筛查的PICU中,医生最常(62.7%)以每日频率(64.2%)进行筛查。在有SBT实践方案的PICU中,SBT最常由呼吸治疗师/物理治疗师执行(49.2%),最少由护士执行(4.9%)。拔管后呼吸支持方案并不普遍(28.7%)。对于大多数调查的实践,国际间的差异显著。估计国际拔管失败的中位数为5%(四分位间距,2.3 - 10%)。大多数受访者自我报告在小于或等于50%的拔管中使用计划性高流量鼻导管(84.2%),在小于或等于20%的拔管中使用计划性无创通气(81.6%)。
结论
国际儿科通气撤离实践的变异性很高,方案实施的普遍性普遍较低。有必要更好地了解推动临床结果的要素,并抓住机会在全球范围内规范儿科通气撤离实践。