Chung Yuen Kwan, Ho Ling Yin, Lee Carolyn, To Chi Hung, Mok Chi Chiu
Department of Medicine, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Department of Medicine, Pok Oi Hospital, Yuen Long, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022 May 27;14:1759720X221100300. doi: 10.1177/1759720X221100300. eCollection 2022.
The aim of this study was to validate the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive Chinese patients.
Medical records of all adult patients who attended the rheumatology out-patient clinics between May and September 2019 were reviewed. Patients with ever ANA positive (titre ⩾1:80) were included and evaluated for the fulfilment of the 2019 EULAR/ACR, 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) and 1997 ACR criteria for SLE classification. The performance of these criteria in predicting a clinical diagnosis of SLE as judged by an independent panel of rheumatologists was studied and compared in different subgroups.
A total of 1533 patients (88.2% women; age at first clinic attendance 45.5 ± 15.6 years) were studied and 562 patients were judged to be clinical SLE. The sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR (⩾10 points), SLICC and ACR criteria for a clinical diagnosis of SLE was 96.1%, 97.9% and 86.1%; and 85.8%, 86.3% and 94.3%, respectively. Applying the attribution rule to the non-SLE controls, the specificity of the three criteria increased to 95.0%, 92.5% and 98.8%, respectively. The specificity of the EULAR/ACR criteria was higher in male patients (97.9%), those aged >50 years (97.0%) and disease duration of ⩽3 years (97.6%). Using a cut-off of 12 points, the specificity of the EULAR/ACR criteria was further increased (96.6%) while a high sensitivity (95.0%) was maintained.
In Chinese patients with a positive ANA, the EULAR/ACR criteria for clinical SLE perform equally well to the SLICC criteria. Both the EULAR/ACR and SLICC are more sensitive but less specific than the ACR criteria. The specificity of all the three criteria is enhanced by applying the attribution rule to controls. The specificity of the EULAR/ACR criteria is higher in certain patient subgroups or when the cut-off score is raised.
本研究旨在验证2019年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会(EULAR/ACR)系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)分类标准在抗核抗体(ANA)阳性中国患者中的有效性。
回顾了2019年5月至9月期间在风湿病门诊就诊的所有成年患者的病历。纳入ANA曾阳性(滴度⩾1:80)的患者,并评估其是否符合2019年EULAR/ACR、2012年系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床组(SLICC)和1997年ACR的SLE分类标准。研究并比较了这些标准在不同亚组中由独立的风湿病专家小组判断预测SLE临床诊断的表现。
共研究了1533例患者(88.2%为女性;首次就诊年龄45.5±15.6岁),其中562例患者被判定为临床SLE。EULAR/ACR(⩾10分)、SLICC和ACR标准对SLE临床诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为96.1%、97.9%和86.1%;以及85.8%、86.3%和94.3%。将归因规则应用于非SLE对照,这三个标准的特异性分别提高到95.0%、92.5%和98.8%。EULAR/ACR标准在男性患者(97.9%)、年龄>50岁的患者(97.0%)和病程⩽3年的患者(97.6%)中特异性更高。使用12分的临界值,EULAR/ACR标准的特异性进一步提高(96.6%),同时保持了较高的敏感性(95.0%)。
在ANA阳性的中国患者中,EULAR/ACR的SLE临床诊断标准与SLICC标准表现相当。EULAR/ACR和SLICC标准均比ACR标准更敏感但特异性更低。将归因规则应用于对照可提高所有三个标准的特异性。EULAR/ACR标准在某些患者亚组中或提高临界值时特异性更高。