Suppr超能文献

验证 2019 年 ACR/EULAR 系统性红斑狼疮分类标准在 100 例日本患者中的应用:真实世界设定分析。

Validation of the 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria of systemic lupus erythematosus in 100 Japanese patients: a real-world setting analysis.

机构信息

Immuno-Rheumatology Centre, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, 9-1 Akashi-cho Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.

Graduate School of Public Health, OMURA Susumu and Mieko Memorial St. Luke's Centre for Clinical Academia, St. Luke's International University, 5th Floor, 3-6-2 Tsukiji Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Jun;39(6):1823-1827. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04848-z. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

Abstract

The objective of the study is to evaluate the sensitivity of the new criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), when applied to real SLE cases. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of 100 consecutive patients who visited St. Luke's International Hospital. Patients were included if they were clinically diagnosed as having SLE and excluded if they had other autoimmune disease or if they were less than 18 years old. Each patient was evaluated if they satisfied the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 classification criteria (1997 criteria), 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria (2012 criteria), or 2019 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria. Among the 100 patients, the sensitivity of the 1997, 2012, and 2019 criteria was, 97, 99, and 92%, respectively. The total patient score with the 2019 criteria ranged from 12 to 44 (mean, 27.3). All patients who were classified as non-SLE with the 2019 criteria had an anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) titre of < 1:80. The 2019 criteria for SLE accomplished modestly high sensitivity in the real-world practice, but not as high as the 1997 and 2012 criteria. They possibly misclassify the real SLE cases as non-SLE, especially if patients have a low titre (< 1:80) of ANA.

摘要

本研究旨在评估新的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)分类标准在真实 SLE 病例中的敏感性。我们回顾性分析了 100 例连续就诊于圣卢克国际医院的患者的电子病历。纳入标准为临床诊断为 SLE 的患者,排除标准为患有其他自身免疫性疾病或年龄小于 18 岁的患者。对每位患者进行评估,以确定其是否符合美国风湿病学会(ACR)1997 年分类标准(1997 标准)、2012 年系统性红斑狼疮国际合作临床标准(2012 标准)或 2019 年 ACR/欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)标准。在这 100 例患者中,1997 年、2012 年和 2019 年标准的敏感性分别为 97%、99%和 92%。2019 年标准的总患者评分范围为 12 至 44(平均 27.3)。所有被 2019 年标准归类为非 SLE 的患者的抗核抗体(ANA)滴度均<1:80。2019 年 SLE 标准在真实世界实践中具有适度高的敏感性,但不如 1997 年和 2012 年标准高。它们可能会错误地将真正的 SLE 病例归类为非 SLE,尤其是如果患者的 ANA 滴度较低(<1:80)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验