• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增强癌症健康差异研究轨迹:改善多样性、公平性、包容性和可及性的临床应用。

Enhancing the Trajectories of Cancer Health Disparities Research: Improving Clinical Applications of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

Department of Biochemistry, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Cancer Discov. 2022 Jun 2;12(6):1428-1434. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-0278.

DOI:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-0278
PMID:35652209
Abstract

In order to accurately detect and prevent racial disparities, self-reported race (SRR) and ethnicity remain valuable tools; however, inaccurate capture of patient identity and broad aggregation of minoritized race groups present challenges for data interpretation. Also, although SRR is a proxy for shared social/cultural experience, it is not an accurate representation of shared endogenous factors. Biological investigations into cancer disparities, particularly those involving genetic features, should be framed in the context of genetic background or ancestry, as these are heritable aspects of population health. In reality, both genetics and environment work in concert to influence cancer risk and clinical outcomes. The best opportunity to define actionable means for reducing health disparities is in rigorous and comprehensive generation of rich data sets that characterize environmental, biological, and genetic components of disparate disease burden. To translate this pivotal disparities research into clinical tools and improved policies, we describe a diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) framework, which will increase participation from diverse backgrounds, reexamine previous research with a rigorous evaluation of appropriate SRR groupings, and engage community leaders to ensure that future research addresses the needs of communities at increased risk. On this path forward, we may finally end cancer disparities.

摘要

为了准确地发现和预防种族差异,自我报告的种族(SRR)和族裔仍然是有价值的工具;然而,患者身份的不准确捕捉和少数族裔群体的广泛聚合给数据解释带来了挑战。此外,尽管 SRR 是共享社会/文化经验的代理,但它并不是共享内源性因素的准确表示。对癌症差异的生物学研究,特别是涉及遗传特征的研究,应该在遗传背景或祖源的背景下进行,因为这些是人口健康的可遗传方面。实际上,遗传和环境协同作用,影响癌症风险和临床结果。定义减少健康差异的可行方法的最佳机会是在严格和全面地生成丰富的数据集,这些数据集描述了不同疾病负担的环境、生物和遗传组成部分。为了将这一关键的差异研究转化为临床工具和改进政策,我们描述了一个多样性、公平、包容和可及性(DEIA)框架,该框架将增加来自不同背景的参与,用严格的方法重新评估适当的 SRR 分组,并让社区领袖参与,以确保未来的研究能够满足处于高风险社区的需求。在这条前进的道路上,我们最终可能会消除癌症差异。

相似文献

1
Enhancing the Trajectories of Cancer Health Disparities Research: Improving Clinical Applications of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility.增强癌症健康差异研究轨迹:改善多样性、公平性、包容性和可及性的临床应用。
Cancer Discov. 2022 Jun 2;12(6):1428-1434. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-0278.
2
Toward representative genomic research: the children's rare disease cohorts experience.迈向具有代表性的基因组研究:儿童罕见病队列研究经验
Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2023 Aug 22;4:26330040231181406. doi: 10.1177/26330040231181406. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
Assessing Sex, Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, Race, Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Mental Health Concerns in Tobacco Use Disorder Treatment Research: Measurement Challenges and Recommendations From a Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco Pre-conference Workshop.评估烟草使用障碍治疗研究中的性别、性别认同、性取向、种族、民族、社会经济地位和心理健康问题:来自尼古丁和烟草研究协会会前研讨会的测量挑战和建议。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Mar 26;24(5):643-653. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab201.
4
Education on cancer risk assessment and genetic counseling to address cancer health disparities among racial/ethnic groups and rural populations: Implementing culturally tailored outreach through community health educators.开展癌症风险评估和遗传咨询教育,以解决种族/族裔群体和农村人口之间的癌症健康差距:通过社区健康教育工作者开展文化上量身定制的外展活动。
J Genet Couns. 2020 Apr;29(2):243-246. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1272. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
5
6
Essential Principles to Create an Equitable, Inclusive, and Diverse EMS Workforce and Work Environment: A Position Statement and Resource Document.创建公平、包容和多元化的 EMS 劳动力和工作环境的基本原则:立场声明和资源文件。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(5):552-556. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2187103. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
7
Integrating Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility into a Data Storytelling Model for Health Informatics Education.将多样性、公平性、包容性和可及性融入健康信息学教育的数据叙事模型。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Oct;15(5):1066-1073. doi: 10.1055/a-2407-1329. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
Diversity and Disparities in Lung Cancer Outcomes Among Minorities.少数民族肺癌患者的治疗结果存在多样性和差异。
Cancer J. 2023;29(6):323-327. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000689.
10
Traversing the Aging Research and Health Equity Divide: Toward Intersectional Frameworks of Research Justice and Participation.跨越老龄化研究与健康公平鸿沟:走向研究正义与参与的交叉框架。
Gerontologist. 2022 May 26;62(5):711-720. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab107.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of genetic ancestry on survival outcomes in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.遗传血统对儿童横纹肌肉瘤生存结局的影响:来自儿童肿瘤学组的报告。
HGG Adv. 2025 Jul 10;6(3):100466. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100466. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
Ancestral Differences in Anticancer Treatment Efficacy and Their Underlying Genomic and Molecular Alterations.抗癌治疗疗效的祖先差异及其潜在的基因组和分子改变。
Cancer Discov. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):511-529. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-24-0827.
3
Racial/ethnic differences in the clinical presentation and survival of breast cancer by subtype.
乳腺癌不同亚型的临床表现及生存情况中的种族/民族差异。
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 16;14:1443399. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1443399. eCollection 2024.
4
Identification of germline population variants misclassified as cancer-associated somatic variants.识别被误分类为癌症相关体细胞变异的种系群体变异。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 20;11:1361317. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1361317. eCollection 2024.
5
A proposed multi-domain, digital model for capturing functional status and health-related quality of life in oncology.提出了一种多领域的数字模型,用于捕捉肿瘤学中的功能状态和与健康相关的生活质量。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jan;17(1):e13712. doi: 10.1111/cts.13712.
6
Inequity in Cancer and Cancer Care Delivery in the United States.美国癌症与癌症医疗服务提供中的不平等现象。
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2024 Feb;38(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
7
Research Silos in Cancer Disparities: Obstacles to Improving Clinical Outcomes for Underserved Patient Populations.癌症差异研究中的隔阂:改善服务不足患者群体临床结局的障碍。
Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Apr 3;29(7):1194-1199. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-3182.