Department of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Division of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ann Work Expo Health. 2022 Oct 11;66(8):985-997. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac037.
Wildland firefighters (WLFFs) are exposed to a mixture of chemicals found in wildland fire smoke and emissions from nonwildland-fuel smoke sources such as diesel. We investigated compositional differences in exposure to particulate matter and explored differences in ventilation rate and potential inhaled dose relative to the work tasks of WLFFs. Repeated measures on ten professional and two volunteer firefighters were collected on prescribed burn and nonburn days. Personal monitoring consisted of real-time and gravimetric fine particulate matter (PM2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), and accelerometer measurements to estimate ventilation rate and potential dose of PM2.5. The fine particulate matter was analyzed for levoglucosan (LG) and light absorbing carbon as a surrogate for black carbon (BC). Breathing zone personal exposure concentrations of PM2.5, LG, BC, and CO were higher on burn days (P < 0.05). Differences in exposure concentrations were observed between burn day tasks (P < 0.05) with firefighters managing fire boundaries (holders) being exposed to higher CO and LG concentrations and less BC concentrations than those conducting lighting (lighters). While no statistical difference in PM2.5 exposure measures was observed between the two tasks, holders in the study tended to be exposed to higher PM2.5 concentrations (1.4×), while lighters tended to have more inhaled amounts of PM2.5 (1.3×). Our findings demonstrate possible diversity in the sources of particulate matter exposure at the fireline and suggest the potential importance of using dose as a metric of inhalation exposure in occupational or other settings.
野外消防员(WLFF)暴露于野火烟雾和非野火燃料烟雾源(如柴油)排放物中所含的化学物质混合物中。我们研究了暴露于颗粒物的组成差异,并探索了与 WLFF 工作任务相关的通风率和潜在吸入剂量的差异。在有计划的燃烧日和无燃烧日对十名专业消防员和两名志愿消防员进行了重复测量。个人监测包括实时和重量法细颗粒物(PM2.5)、一氧化碳(CO)和加速度计测量,以估计通风率和 PM2.5 的潜在剂量。对细颗粒物进行了左旋葡聚糖(LG)和光吸收碳(作为黑碳(BC)的替代物)分析。在燃烧日(P < 0.05),呼吸区个人 PM2.5、LG、BC 和 CO 暴露浓度更高。在燃烧日任务之间观察到暴露浓度的差异(P < 0.05),管理火灾边界的消防员(持有者)暴露于更高的 CO 和 LG 浓度,而暴露于 BC 浓度较低的浓度比那些进行点火(点火器)的消防员。虽然在这两项任务之间没有观察到 PM2.5 暴露测量值的统计学差异,但研究中的持有者倾向于暴露于更高的 PM2.5 浓度(约 1.4×),而点火器倾向于吸入更多的 PM2.5(约 1.3×)。我们的研究结果表明,在火线处,颗粒物暴露的来源可能存在差异,并表明在职业或其他环境中使用剂量作为吸入暴露的度量标准的重要性。