Population Health Intelligence, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, Australia.
South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales Medicine, Liverpool, Australia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2212449. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12449.
Resettled refugees in high-income countries represent a vulnerable population. It is known that refugees have high rates of trauma-related mental health issues; however, ad hoc research has generally revealed low rates of health services use among refugees. Such research usually samples a population at a single point in time and is based on targeted surveys. Because refugee populations change over time, such research becomes expensive and time-consuming for agencies interested in routinely publishing statistics of mental health services use among refugees. The linking of large administrative data sets to establish rates of use of mental health services among resettled refugees is a flexible and relatively inexpensive approach.
To use data linkage to establish rates of mental health services use among resettled refugees relative to the general population.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study implemented data linkage from the Refugee Health Nurse Program for 10 050 refugees who resettled in Sydney, Australia, from October 23, 2012, to June 8, 2017, with data concerning use of community mental health services and mental health hospitalization from New South Wales Health databases. Data were analyzed between June 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021.
Rates of service contacts with community mental health services among the resettled refugees were compared with those of the general population by age, sex, and the most common International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, diagnosis codes. Length of community mental health service sessions and rates of mental health hospitalizations were also compared.
Among the 255 resettled refugees who had contacts with community mental health care services and were not missing data (median age, 35 [range, 4-80] years; 117 [64%] male and 138 [54%] female), 153 (60%) were born in Iraq and 156 (61%) were Arabic speaking. This population was less likely to use mental health services than the general population and had shorter community mental health consultations. The rate of contacts with community mental health services for depressive disorders among the resettled refugee population was 40% (95% CI, 33%-46%) lower than that among the general population. Rates of same-day hospitalization per 10 000 person-years were not significantly different between the refugee population (4 [95% CI, 2-8]) and the general Australian population (7 [95% CI, 7-7]). However, the refugee population was 17% (95% CI, 6%-29%) more likely than the general Australian population to interact with the community mental health system for severe stress- and adjustment disorder-related diagnoses.
These findings suggest that refugees who have resettled in Australia tend to use fewer mental health services than the general population except for services devoted to stress- and adjustment disorder-related diagnoses. These findings also suggest that it is possible to successfully leverage data linkage to study patterns of mental health services use among resettled refugees.
高收入国家的重新安置难民是一个弱势群体。众所周知,难民的创伤相关心理健康问题发生率很高;然而,临时研究通常显示难民对卫生服务的使用率较低。此类研究通常在一个时间点对人群进行抽样,并基于有针对性的调查。由于难民群体随时间而变化,因此对于有兴趣定期公布难民使用心理健康服务统计数据的机构来说,这种研究变得昂贵且耗时。通过链接大型行政数据集来确定重新安置难民使用心理健康服务的比率是一种灵活且相对廉价的方法。
使用数据链接来确定重新安置难民相对于一般人群使用心理健康服务的比率。
设计、地点和参与者:这项横断面研究从 2012 年 10 月 23 日至 2017 年 6 月 8 日对在澳大利亚悉尼重新安置的 10050 名难民实施了数据链接,数据来自新南威尔士州卫生数据库中与社区心理健康服务和心理健康住院相关的使用情况。数据于 2019 年 6 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日进行了分析。
通过年龄、性别和最常见的国际疾病分类第十版相关健康问题将重新安置难民的社区心理健康服务接触率与一般人群进行比较。还比较了社区心理健康服务会议的长度和心理健康住院率。
在与社区心理健康护理服务有接触且无数据缺失的 255 名重新安置难民中(中位数年龄为 35 [范围为 4-80] 岁;117 [64%] 为男性,138 [54%] 为女性),有 153 人(60%)出生于伊拉克,有 156 人(61%)讲阿拉伯语。与一般人群相比,该人群使用心理健康服务的可能性较小,社区心理健康咨询时间也较短。重新安置难民中与抑郁障碍相关的社区心理健康服务接触率比一般人群低 40%(95%CI,33%-46%)。每 10000 人年的当日住院率在难民人群(4 [95%CI,2-8])和澳大利亚一般人群(7 [95%CI,7-7])之间没有显著差异。然而,与澳大利亚一般人群相比,难民人群因严重应激和适应障碍相关诊断而与社区心理健康系统交互的可能性高 17%(95%CI,6%-29%)。
这些发现表明,在澳大利亚重新安置的难民使用心理健康服务的比例往往低于一般人群,除了与应激和适应障碍相关的诊断专门提供的服务外。这些发现还表明,成功利用数据链接来研究重新安置难民使用心理健康服务的模式是可行的。