Department of Radiation Oncology, Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Aug;42(6):2426-2432. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2069484. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
We retrospectively analysed the prognostic significance of serum albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and albumin to ALP ratio (AAPR) and other prognostic factors affecting the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 200 cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The prognostic factors for OS and DFS, in addition to the predictive factors of albumin, ALP and AAPR, were investigated. Older age, lymph node metastasis, non-complete response (CR) to treatment and low serum albumin levels emerged as predictors of poor OS and PFS in multivariate analysis. However, with a cut-off value of 0.51, AAPR was not a significant prognostic factor of survival in multivariable analysis. There were no significant differences in clinicopathological factors between patients with low and high AAPR, except for lymph node metastasis, where lymph node metastasis rate was significantly higher in patients with a low AAPR compared to those with a high AAPR. Patients with CR had a significantly higher serum albumin level and AAPR compared to patients without CR. The pre-treatment serum albumin level was independent predictive for survival; therefore, it could be a suitable biomarker to guide systemic therapy and predict patient outcomes. Impact Statement Two major determinants of tumour progression are nutritional status and inflammation. The albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR), which was originally proposed as a marker for nutritional status and immune response, was recently discovered to be a prognostic factor for various cancer types. However, its utility in the treatment of cervical cancer has not been established. Low serum albumin levels were associated with a significantly shorter OS and PFS in cervical cancer patients treated definitively with CRT. AAPR, on the other hand, was not a significant prognostic factor for survival with a cut-off value of 0.51. Regional lymph node metastasis was significantly more common in patients with a low AAPR than in those with a high AAPR. Patients with multiple clinicopathological risk factors and low serum albumin levels had an increased risk of disease recurrence and a poorer prognosis, highlighting the importance of additional adjuvant treatment strategies in these patients. Due to the preliminary nature of our findings, additional research is required to corroborate them.
我们回顾性分析了 200 例接受根治性放化疗(CRT)的宫颈癌患者的血清白蛋白、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)和白蛋白与 ALP 比值(AAPR)及其他影响总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)的预后因素。除了白蛋白、ALP 和 AAPR 的预测因素外,还探讨了 OS 和 DFS 的预后因素。多因素分析显示,年龄较大、淋巴结转移、治疗后非完全缓解(CR)和低血清白蛋白水平是 OS 和 PFS 不良的预测因素。然而,AAPR 截断值为 0.51 时,在多变量分析中不是生存的显著预后因素。低 AAPR 组和高 AAPR 组患者的临床病理因素无显著差异,除了淋巴结转移,低 AAPR 组的淋巴结转移率明显高于高 AAPR 组。CR 患者的血清白蛋白水平和 AAPR 明显高于非 CR 患者。治疗前的血清白蛋白水平是独立的生存预测因素;因此,它可能是指导全身治疗和预测患者结局的合适生物标志物。
肿瘤进展的两个主要决定因素是营养状况和炎症。白蛋白与碱性磷酸酶比值(AAPR)最初被提出作为营养状况和免疫反应的标志物,最近被发现是各种癌症类型的预后因素。然而,它在宫颈癌治疗中的应用尚未得到证实。
低血清白蛋白水平与 CRT 治疗的宫颈癌患者的 OS 和 PFS 显著缩短相关。另一方面,AAPR 截断值为 0.51 时,对生存不是一个显著的预后因素。低 AAPR 组患者的局部淋巴结转移明显多于高 AAPR 组。
患有多种临床病理危险因素和低血清白蛋白水平的患者疾病复发风险增加,预后较差,这突出了在这些患者中增加辅助治疗策略的重要性。由于我们的研究结果初步,需要进一步的研究来证实它们。