• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于儿科轻度创伤性脑损伤重复头部计算机断层扫描的新型决策支持工具 (IniCT 评分)。

A Novel Decision-Support Tool (IniCT Score) for Repeat Head Computed Tomography in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2022 Sep;165:e102-e109. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.103. Epub 2022 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.103
PMID:35654329
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The necessity of computed tomography (CT) has been questioned in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) because of concerns related to radiation exposure. Distinguishing patients with lower and higher risk of clinically important TBI (ciTBI) is paramount to the optimal management of these patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the imaging predictors of ciTBI and develop an algorithm to identify patients at low and high risk for ciTBI to inform clinical decision making using a large single-center cohort of pediatric patients with mTBI.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified pediatric patients with mTBI with repeat CT within 48 hours of injury using an institutional database.

RESULTS

Among 3867 pediatric patients, 219 patients with mTBI with repeat CT were included. Thirty-eight had ciTBI (17%), 16 (7%) required intensive care unit admission, and 6 (3%) underwent surgery. Median time interval between initial and repeat CT was 7 hours (range, 4-10). Clinical worsening and radiologic progression were evident in 36 (16%) and 24 (11%) patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that 5 pathologic findings (depressed skull fracture, pneumocephalus, epidural hematoma, subdural hematoma, and contusion) on initial CT and radiologic progression on repeat CT were independent predictors of ciTBI. A new scoring system based on these 5 factors on initial CT (IniCT [Initial CT scoring system] score) had excellent discrimination for ciTBI, need for intensive care unit admission, and neurosurgery (area under the curve >0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

The IniCT scoring system can successfully differentiate low-risk and high-risk patients based on initial CT scan. Zero score can eliminate the need for a routine repeat CT, whereas scores ≥2 should prompt serial neurologic examinations and/or repeat CT depending on the clinical situation.

摘要

背景

由于担心辐射暴露,在儿科轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)中已经对计算机断层扫描(CT)的必要性提出了质疑。区分低危和高危患者对于这些患者的最佳管理至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在分析 ciTBI 的影像学预测因素,并开发一种算法,使用大型单中心儿科 mTBI 患者队列来识别 ciTBI 低危和高危患者,以指导临床决策。

方法

我们使用机构数据库回顾性地确定了伤后 48 小时内进行重复 CT 的儿科 mTBI 患者。

结果

在 3867 名儿科患者中,有 219 名 mTBI 患者进行了重复 CT。38 例患者发生 ciTBI(17%),16 例(7%)需要入住重症监护病房,6 例(3%)需要手术。初次 CT 和重复 CT 之间的中位时间间隔为 7 小时(范围,4-10 小时)。36 例(16%)患者出现临床恶化,24 例(11%)患者出现影像学进展。多变量分析显示,初次 CT 上的 5 种病理发现(凹陷性颅骨骨折、气颅、硬膜外血肿、硬膜下血肿和脑挫裂伤)和重复 CT 上的影像学进展是 ciTBI 的独立预测因素。一种新的评分系统,基于初次 CT 上的这 5 个因素(IniCT [初始 CT 评分系统]评分),对 ciTBI、需要入住重症监护病房和神经外科手术的预测效果良好(曲线下面积>0.8)。

结论

IniCT 评分系统可以根据初次 CT 扫描成功区分低危和高危患者。得分为 0 可消除常规重复 CT 的需求,而得分≥2 则应根据临床情况提示进行连续神经检查和/或重复 CT。

相似文献

1
A Novel Decision-Support Tool (IniCT Score) for Repeat Head Computed Tomography in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.一种用于儿科轻度创伤性脑损伤重复头部计算机断层扫描的新型决策支持工具 (IniCT 评分)。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Sep;165:e102-e109. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.103. Epub 2022 May 30.
2
Clinical Significance of Pneumocephalus in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.小儿轻度颅脑损伤并发气颅的临床意义。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2023 Nov 1;39(11):836-840. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003060. Epub 2023 Oct 8.
3
Role of repeat CT in mild to moderate head injury: an institutional study.重复 CT 在轻度至中度头部损伤中的作用:一项机构研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Nov 1;47(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2019.8.FOCUS19527.
4
Profile of Patients Receiving Computed Tomography Scans for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚的一家三级护理医院接受计算机断层扫描检查的轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的特征。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Jun;186:e673-e682. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.028. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
5
Assessing the efficacy of mild traumatic brain injury management.评估轻度创伤性脑损伤管理的疗效。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Mar;202:106518. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106518. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
6
Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and the Need for Imaging Surveillance.复杂性轻度创伤性脑损伤与影像学监测的必要性。
World Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;105:265-269. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
Pathological Computed Tomography Features Associated With Adverse Outcomes After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study With External Validation in CENTER-TBI.轻度创伤性脑损伤后不良结局相关的病理计算机断层扫描特征:TRACK-TBI 研究及其在 CENTER-TBI 中的外部验证。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):1137-1148. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2120.
8
Performance of the Pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale Score in the Evaluation of Children With Blunt Head Trauma.小儿格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分在钝性头部创伤患儿评估中的表现
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;23(8):878-84. doi: 10.1111/acem.13014. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
9
To Scan or Not to Scan: Overutilization of Computed Tomography for Minor Head Injury at a Pediatric Trauma Center.扫描还是不扫描:儿科创伤中心对轻度头部损伤的计算机断层扫描过度使用情况
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
10
Computed Tomography Lesions and Their Association With Global Outcome in Young People With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.计算机断层扫描病变及其与轻度创伤性脑损伤青少年总体预后的关系。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Jun;40(11-12):1243-1254. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0055. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Electric Scooter Falls: The 2023-2024 Experience in the Clinical Emergency Children's Hospital in Galați.电动滑板车摔倒:2023 - 2024年加拉茨市儿童临床急诊医院的情况
Clin Pract. 2024 Sep 4;14(5):1818-1826. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14050145.