Grundy Emily Marjatta, Stuchbury Rachel
Institute for Social & Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
CeLSIUS, EPH, University College London, London, UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Jun 2;76(8):699-706. doi: 10.1136/jech-2021-217846.
Multimorbidity is common at older ages and is associated with disability, frailty and poor quality of life. Research using clinical databases and surveys has shown associations between multimorbidity and indicators of social disadvantage. Use of multiple coded death registration data has been proposed as an additional source which may also provide insights into quality of death certification.
We investigate trends in reporting multiple causes of death during 2001-2017 among decedents aged 65 years and over included in a census-based sample of 1% of the England and Wales population (Office for National Statistics Longitudinal Study). Using Poisson regression analysis, we analyse variations in number of mentions of causes of death recorded by time period, place of death, age, sex and marital status at death and indicators of health status and individual and area socioeconomic disadvantage reported at the census prior to death.
Number of mentions of causes recorded at death registration increased 2001-2017, increased with age, peaking among decedents aged 85-9 years, and was positively associated with indicators of prior disadvantage and poor health, although effects were small. Number of mentions was highest for hospital decedents and similar for those dying in care homes or their own homes.
Socioeconomic disadvantage, prior poor health, dying in hospital and older age-although not extreme old age-are associated with dying with more recorded conditions. Results may reflect both differences in multimorbidity at death and variations in quality of medical certification of death. Quality of death certification for decedents in care homes needs further investigation.
多种疾病共存现象在老年人中很常见,且与残疾、身体虚弱和生活质量差相关。利用临床数据库和调查开展的研究已表明多种疾病共存与社会劣势指标之间存在关联。有人提议使用多重编码死亡登记数据作为额外的数据来源,这也可能有助于深入了解死亡证明的质量。
我们调查了2001年至2017年期间,在英格兰和威尔士1%人口的基于普查的样本(英国国家统计局纵向研究)中纳入的65岁及以上死者报告多种死因的趋势。使用泊松回归分析,我们分析了按时间段、死亡地点、年龄、性别和死亡时的婚姻状况记录的死因提及次数的变化,以及在死亡前普查中报告的健康状况指标以及个人和地区社会经济劣势指标。
2001年至2017年期间,死亡登记时记录的死因提及次数有所增加,随年龄增长而增加,在85至89岁的死者中达到峰值,并且与先前劣势和健康状况不佳的指标呈正相关,尽管影响较小。医院死者的死因提及次数最高,在养老院或自己家中死亡的死者的死因提及次数相似。
社会经济劣势、先前健康状况不佳、在医院死亡以及年龄较大(尽管不是极高龄)与记录更多疾病状况的死亡相关。结果可能既反映了死亡时多种疾病共存情况的差异,也反映了死亡医学证明质量的差异。养老院死者的死亡证明质量需要进一步调查。