Evans Catherine J, Ho Yuen, Daveson Barbara A, Hall Sue, Higginson Irene J, Gao Wei
Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, United Kingdom; Sussex Community NHS Trust, Brighton and Hove, United Kingdom.
Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, United Kingdom.
PLoS Med. 2014 Jun 3;11(6):e1001653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001653. eCollection 2014 Jun.
Centenarians are a rapidly growing demographic group worldwide, yet their health and social care needs are seldom considered. This study aims to examine trends in place of death and associations for centenarians in England over 10 years to consider policy implications of extreme longevity.
This is a population-based observational study using death registration data linked with area-level indices of multiple deprivations for people aged ≥100 years who died 2001 to 2010 in England, compared with those dying at ages 80-99. We used linear regression to examine the time trends in number of deaths and place of death, and Poisson regression to evaluate factors associated with centenarians' place of death. The cohort totalled 35,867 people with a median age at death of 101 years (range: 100-115 years). Centenarian deaths increased 56% (95% CI 53.8%-57.4%) in 10 years. Most died in a care home with (26.7%, 95% CI 26.3%-27.2%) or without nursing (34.5%, 95% CI 34.0%-35.0%) or in hospital (27.2%, 95% CI 26.7%-27.6%). The proportion of deaths in nursing homes decreased over 10 years (-0.36% annually, 95% CI -0.63% to -0.09%, p = 0.014), while hospital deaths changed little (0.25% annually, 95% CI -0.06% to 0.57%, p = 0.09). Dying with frailty was common with "old age" stated in 75.6% of death certifications. Centenarians were more likely to die of pneumonia (e.g., 17.7% [95% CI 17.3%-18.1%] versus 6.0% [5.9%-6.0%] for those aged 80-84 years) and old age/frailty (28.1% [27.6%-28.5%] versus 0.9% [0.9%-0.9%] for those aged 80-84 years) and less likely to die of cancer (4.4% [4.2%-4.6%] versus 24.5% [24.6%-25.4%] for those aged 80-84 years) and ischemic heart disease (8.6% [8.3%-8.9%] versus 19.0% [18.9%-19.0%] for those aged 80-84 years) than were younger elderly patients. More care home beds available per 1,000 population were associated with fewer deaths in hospital (PR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98-0.99, p<0.001).
Centenarians are more likely to have causes of death certified as pneumonia and frailty and less likely to have causes of death of cancer or ischemic heart disease, compared with younger elderly patients. To reduce reliance on hospital care at the end of life requires recognition of centenarians' increased likelihood to "acute" decline, notably from pneumonia, and wider provision of anticipatory care to enable people to remain in their usual residence, and increasing care home bed capacity.
百岁老人是全球范围内一个快速增长的人口群体,但他们的健康和社会护理需求很少得到考虑。本研究旨在调查英格兰百岁老人在10年期间的死亡地点趋势及相关因素,以探讨极端长寿的政策含义。
这是一项基于人群的观察性研究,使用与多重贫困地区层面指数相关联的死亡登记数据,研究对象为2001年至2010年在英格兰死亡的年龄≥100岁的人群,并与80 - 99岁死亡人群进行比较。我们使用线性回归分析死亡人数和死亡地点的时间趋势,使用泊松回归评估与百岁老人死亡地点相关的因素。该队列共有35867人,死亡时的年龄中位数为101岁(范围:100 - 115岁)。百岁老人的死亡人数在10年中增加了56%(95%置信区间53.8% - 57.4%)。大多数人死于养老院(有护理服务的占26.7%,95%置信区间26.3% - 27.2%;无护理服务的占34.5%,95%置信区间34.0% - 35.0%)或医院(占27.2%,95%置信区间26.7% - 27.6%)。养老院死亡比例在10年中有所下降(每年下降-0.36%,9%置信区间-0.63%至-0.09%,p = 0.014),而医院死亡比例变化不大(每年变化0.25%,95%置信区间-0.06%至0.57%,p = 0.09)。在75.6%的死亡证明中,“老年”被列为虚弱导致死亡的常见原因。与年轻老年患者相比,百岁老人死于肺炎的可能性更高(例如,17.7% [95%置信区间17.3% - 18.1%],而80 - 84岁人群为6.0% [5.9% - 6.0%]),死于老年/虚弱的可能性更高(28.1% [27.6% - 28.5%],而80 - 84岁人群为0.9% [0.9% - 0.9%]),死于癌症的可能性更低(4.4% [4.2% - 4.6%],而80 - 84岁人群为24.5% [24.6% - 25.4%]),死于缺血性心脏病的可能性更低(8.6% [8.3% - 8.9%],而80 - 84岁人群为19.0% [18.9% - 19.0%])。每1000人口中可用的养老院床位越多,医院死亡人数越少(风险比0.98,95%置信区间即0.98 - 0.99,p<0.001)。
与年轻老年患者相比,百岁老人更有可能被证明死于肺炎和虚弱,而死于癌症或缺血性心脏病的可能性较小。为减少临终时对医院护理的依赖,需要认识到百岁老人更有可能出现“急性”衰退,尤其是因肺炎导致的衰退,并更广泛地提供预瞻性护理,以使人们能够留在其常住地,同时增加养老院床位容量。