Cantos José M
16733University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Eval Rev. 2022 Dec;46(6):725-749. doi: 10.1177/0193841X221103338. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
The globalization of commercial exchanges and capital movements reveal new ways of obtaining value in economic activities, and the differences in the tax burden of companies, depending on where they reside, have become threats for countries to exercise the right to tax business profits generated in its jurisdiction. This problem, together with tax competition between countries, causes a transfer of tax bases towards countries with lower tax rates and tax havens. The lack of agreement in the international community on how to find a solution to the problems has caused several countries to choose to establish special taxes for certain activities of multinational companies in their jurisdictions, resulting in inefficient taxes. This paper analyzes the agreement reached in October 2021 in the G20 and in the OECD in which measures are adopted within the BEPS project to prevent the erosion of tax bases in market jurisdictions promoted by multinational companies. After studying different aspects, we found fundamental reasons for not having an optimistic view on the effective solution to the problems above: unrealistic forecasts on the amount of the new estimated tax bases for Pillar 1 and the high administration and compliance costs. In conclusion, it is not foreseeable that the tax bases derived from the provision of digital services will suffer a territorial redistribution. We do not expect that a minimum tax rate of 15% in corporate tax will be carried out effectively or that the benefits that are transferred to tax havens will be significantly reduced.
商业交流和资本流动的全球化揭示了经济活动中获取价值的新方式,而公司税负因所在地不同而存在差异,这已成为各国对其辖区内产生的商业利润行使征税权的威胁。这个问题,再加上国家间的税收竞争,导致税基向税率较低的国家和避税天堂转移。国际社会在如何解决这些问题上缺乏共识,导致一些国家选择对其辖区内跨国公司的某些活动征收特别税,从而造成税收效率低下。本文分析了2021年10月二十国集团(G20)和经济合作与发展组织(OECD)达成的协议,该协议在应对税基侵蚀和利润转移(BEPS)项目中采取措施,以防止跨国公司推动的市场辖区税基侵蚀。在研究了不同方面后,我们发现对上述问题的有效解决方案持不乐观态度的根本原因:对支柱一(Pillar 1)新估计税基数额的不切实际预测以及高昂的管理和合规成本。总之,无法预见来自数字服务提供的税基会出现地域重新分配。我们预计企业税15%的最低税率不会有效实施,转移到避税天堂的利润也不会大幅减少。