van Adrichem Roxanne C S, Voorneveld Hanneke J E, Waverijn Geeke J, Kok Marc R, Bisoendial Radjesh J
Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Aug;9(4):1109-1118. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00465-6. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
The adalimumab biosimilar (ADAbio) Amgevita® has a similar efficacy and safety profile as the adalimumab reference (ADA) Humira®. We studied the clinical consequences of a non-medical switch from ADA to ADAbio in adult patients with mainly established rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and spondyloarthritis (SpA).
Patients that received treatment with ADA for at least three months were switched to ADAbio. Data was collected retrospectively from 1 year before the switch up to 6 months after.
A total of 603 patients were switched from ADA to ADAbio (switch group). During a 1-year follow-up, over 93% of all patients underwent a successful transition in terms of disease activity and safety from ADA to biosimilar, supporting the bioequivalence of both drugs in patients with stable inflammatory rheumatic joint diseases. Forty patients (6.6%) switched back to ADA (re-switch group). There were no objective changes in disease activity score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), or adverse effects before and after the switch between both groups.
In line with earlier reports, the transition to ADAbio went successful in the majority of patients with stable inflammatory rheumatic joint diseases. Patient-reported symptoms without objective signs that indicate a flare of disease activity after the switch to ADAbio are probably explained by nocebo effects. A pre-emptive approach to counteract nocebo effects and stimulate placebo response may have a positive impact on health outcomes for patients and preserve the economic benefits of cost savings that can be achieved by prescribing a biosimilar instead of the reference drug.
阿达木单抗生物类似药(ADAbio)安进维达(Amgevita®)与阿达木单抗参比制剂(ADA)修美乐(Humira®)具有相似的疗效和安全性。我们研究了在主要患有类风湿关节炎(RA)、银屑病关节炎(PsA)和脊柱关节炎(SpA)的成年患者中,从ADA非医学转换为ADAbio的临床后果。
接受ADA治疗至少三个月的患者转换为ADAbio。回顾性收集转换前1年至转换后6个月的数据。
共有603例患者从ADA转换为ADAbio(转换组)。在1年的随访中,超过93%的患者在疾病活动度和安全性方面从ADA成功过渡到生物类似药,这支持了两种药物在稳定的炎性风湿性关节疾病患者中的生物等效性。40例患者(6.6%)换回了ADA(再转换组)。两组在使用C反应蛋白评估的28个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28-CRP)或转换前后的不良反应方面均无客观变化。
与早期报告一致,大多数稳定的炎性风湿性关节疾病患者向ADAbio的转换是成功的。转换为ADAbio后患者报告的无客观体征表明疾病活动度发作的症状可能是由反安慰剂效应解释的。一种抵消反安慰剂效应并刺激安慰剂反应的前瞻性方法可能对患者的健康结局产生积极影响,并保留通过开具生物类似药而非参比制剂所能实现的成本节约的经济效益。