Neema Shekhar, Sandhu Sunmeet, Mukherjee Sweta, Vashisht Deepak, Vendhan Senkadir, Sinha Anwita, Vasudevan Biju
Department of Dermatology, AFMC, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Dermatology, CH (AF), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Indian J Dermatol. 2022 Jan-Feb;67(1):19-25. doi: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_681_21.
Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is a common yet difficult problem to diagnose in tuberculosis endemic countries. Both tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) are used for the diagnosis of LTBI.
The aim of the study is to compare TST and IGRA in patients planned for systemic treatment of psoriasis.
It was a diagnostic study conducted in a tertiary care centre during the study period from January 20 to December 20. Patients more than 18 years of age with chronic plaque psoriasis planned for systemic therapy were included. Psoriasis area severity index (PASI), history of tuberculosis in past or family and BCG vaccination were recorded. Complete blood count, radiograph of the chest, tuberculin skin test and interferon-gamma release assay were performed in all patients. Statistical analysis was performed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS version 20, Chicago).
A total of 75 patients, including 48 males and 27 females, were included in the study. The mean age and mean duration of disease were 46.08 (±12.16) and 4.59 (±3.8) years, respectively. Seventy-one (94.6%) patients had BCG scar, and two (2.6%) had a history of tuberculosis in a family member. The TST and IGRA were positive (>10 mm) in 23 (30.6%) and 16 (21.3%) patients, respectively. Either TST or IGRA was positive in 28 (37.3%) patients. Out of these 28 patients, concordance was seen in 11 (39.2%) and discordance in 17 (60.7%). Discordance was TST+/IGRA - in 12 (42.8%) and TST-/IGRA + in five (17.8%) patients. Abnormality in radiograph of the chest and computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest were seen in five (6.6%) and nine (12%) patients, respectively. The patients with either TST or IGRA + were more likely to have abnormal chest radiographs than those who were TST-/IGRA- (OR: 11.3, 95% CI: 1.24-102.3, = 0.03). The TST and IGRA showed fair agreement ( = 0.364, = 0.003). ROC curve was plotted for the absolute value of TST in mm considering IGRA as the gold standard. The area under the curve was 0.805 (95%CI: 0.655-0.954). For the TST positivity cut-off of 10 and 15 mm, specificity was 77.3% and 95.5%, respectively; the sensitivity was 68.8% irrespective of the cut-off value.
Small sample size and lack of follow-up are the biggest limitations of the study. The lack of a gold standard in the diagnosis of LTBI is an inherent yet unavoidable flaw in the study.
Reactivation of LTBI is a concern in a patient planned for immunosuppressive therapy. We suggest the use of both TST and IGRA rather than two-step testing (TST followed by IGRA) or IGRA alone for the diagnosis of LTBI, especially in patients with a high risk of reactivation. The positivity on either test should prompt further evaluation and treatment decisions should be taken considering the risk-benefit ratio of treatment rather than test results alone.
在结核病流行国家,潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)是一个常见但难以诊断的问题。结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)和干扰素-γ释放试验(IGRA)都用于LTBI的诊断。
本研究的目的是比较计划接受银屑病全身治疗的患者中TST和IGRA的诊断价值。
这是一项在三级医疗中心进行的诊断性研究,研究期间为1月20日至12月20日。纳入年龄超过18岁、计划接受全身治疗的慢性斑块状银屑病患者。记录银屑病面积严重程度指数(PASI)、既往或家族结核病病史以及卡介苗接种情况。对所有患者进行全血细胞计数、胸部X线检查、结核菌素皮肤试验和干扰素-γ释放试验。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS 20版,芝加哥)进行统计分析。
本研究共纳入75例患者,其中男性48例,女性27例。平均年龄和平均病程分别为46.08(±12.16)岁和4.59(±3.8)年。71例(94.6%)患者有卡介苗接种瘢痕,2例(2.6%)患者有家庭成员患结核病病史。TST和IGRA阳性(>10 mm)的患者分别为23例(30.6%)和16例(21.3%)。TST或IGRA阳性的患者有28例(37.3%)。在这28例患者中,11例(39.2%)结果一致,17例(60.7%)结果不一致。不一致的情况为TST+/IGRA - 12例(42.8%),TST-/IGRA + 5例(17.8%)。胸部X线检查和胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)异常的患者分别有5例(6.6%)和9例(12%)。TST或IGRA阳性的患者比TST-/IGRA-的患者更有可能出现胸部X线异常(比值比:11.3,95%可信区间:1.24 - 102.3,P = 0.03)。TST和IGRA显示出中等程度的一致性(κ = 0.364,P = 0.003)。以IGRA为金标准,绘制了TST毫米绝对值的ROC曲线。曲线下面积为0.805(95%可信区间:0.655 - 0.954)。对于TST阳性临界值为10和15 mm,特异性分别为77.3%和95.5%;无论临界值如何,敏感性均为68.8%。
样本量小和缺乏随访是本研究最大的局限性。LTBI诊断缺乏金标准是本研究固有的、不可避免的缺陷。
对于计划接受免疫抑制治疗的患者,LTBI的再激活是一个需要关注的问题。我们建议同时使用TST和IGRA,而不是两步检测法(先TST后IGRA)或仅使用IGRA来诊断LTBI,尤其是对于再激活风险高的患者。任何一项检测呈阳性都应促使进一步评估,治疗决策应考虑治疗的风险效益比,而不仅仅是检测结果。