Suppr超能文献

穴位埋线治疗单纯性肥胖的网状Meta分析

Network Meta-Analysis of Acupoint Catgut Embedding in Treatment of Simple Obesity.

作者信息

Wang Zhuo-Yuan, Li Xiao-Yan, Gou Xiao-Jun, Chen Chun-Lan, Li Zun-Yuan, Zhao Chuang, Huo Wen-Ge, Guo Yu-Hong, Yang Yan, Liu Zhi-Dan

机构信息

Baoshan Hospital affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201999, China.

Baoshan District Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine of Shanghai, Shanghai 201999, China.

出版信息

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 May 23;2022:6408073. doi: 10.1155/2022/6408073. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of acupoint catgut embedding in the treatment of simple obesity through network meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP database (VIP) were searched by using computer from 2011 to August 2021, and 35 RCT studies were retrieved. The quality of the literature was evaluated using the modified Jadad scoring table, and Stata 15.0 software was used for traditional meta-analysis and network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-five RCTs (3040 cases in total) were included. Acupoint embedding, acupuncture, electroacupuncture, TCM, acupoint embedding + acupuncture, acupoint embedding + exercise diet therapy, acupoint embedding + TCM, exercise diet therapy, acupoint embedding + moxibustion, and acupoint embedding + cupping were investigated in the studies. The results of network meta-analysis were as follows: in terms of total effective rate, acupoint catgut embedding was superior to acupuncture, electroacupuncture, and exercise diet therapy ( < 0.05); electroacupuncture, acupoint catgut embedding + acupuncture, acupoint catgut embedding + exercise diet therapy, acupoint catgut + TCM, acupoint catgut + moxibustion, and acupoint catgut + cupping were superior to acupuncture ( < 0.05); acupoint catgut + moxibustion was superior to electroacupuncture ( < 0.05); acupoint catgut + TCM, acupoint catgut + moxibustion, and acupoint catgut + cupping were superior to TCM treatment ( < 0.05); and electroacupuncture, acupoint catgut, acupoint catgut + acupuncture, acupoint catgut + exercise diet therapy, acupoint catgut + TCM, acupoint catgut embedding + moxibustion, and acupoint catgut embedding + cupping were superior to sports diet therapy ( < 0.05). Regarding weight loss, acupuncture treatment was superior to acupoint catgut embedding therapy ( < 0.05); acupoint catgut embedding + exercise diet therapy, acupoint catgut embedding + TCM, acupoint catgut embedding + moxibustion, and acupoint catgut embedding + cupping were superior to acupuncture and electroacupuncture treatment ( < 0.05); acupoint catgut embedding + exercise diet therapy, acupoint catgut embedding + TCM, and acupoint catgut embedding + moxibustion were superior to TCM treatment ( < 0.05); and acupoint catgut embedding, acupoint catgut embedding + acupuncture, catgut embedding + exercise diet therapy, acupoint catgut embedding + TCM, acupoint catgut embedding + moxibustion, and acupoint catgut embedding + cupping were superior to exercise diet therapy ( < 0.05). In terms of BMI reduction, acupoint catgut embedding + moxibustion and acupoint catgut embedding + cupping were more evident than acupuncture treatment ( < 0.05); and acupoint catgut embedding + moxibustion was more evident than electroacupuncture treatment ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Acupoint catgut embedding and its combination with other therapies are the first choice for the treatment of simple obesity.

摘要

目的

通过网状Meta分析评价穴位埋线治疗单纯性肥胖症的临床疗效。

方法

利用计算机检索2011年至2021年8月期间的PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、中国知网(CNKI)、万方和维普数据库(VIP),共检索到35项随机对照试验(RCT)研究。采用改良的Jadad评分表对文献质量进行评价,并用Stata 15.0软件进行传统Meta分析和网状Meta分析。

结果

纳入35项RCT研究(共3040例)。研究中涉及穴位埋线、针刺、电针、中药、穴位埋线+针刺、穴位埋线+运动饮食疗法、穴位埋线+中药、运动饮食疗法、穴位埋线+艾灸、穴位埋线+拔罐等。网状Meta分析结果如下:在总有效率方面,穴位埋线优于针刺、电针和运动饮食疗法(P<0.05);电针、穴位埋线+针刺、穴位埋线+运动饮食疗法、穴位埋线+中药、穴位埋线+艾灸、穴位埋线+拔罐优于针刺(P<0.05);穴位埋线+艾灸优于电针(P<0.05);穴位埋线+中药、穴位埋线+艾灸、穴位埋线+拔罐优于中药治疗(P<0.05);电针、穴位埋线、穴位埋线+针刺、穴位埋线+运动饮食疗法、穴位埋线+中药、穴位埋线+艾灸、穴位埋线+拔罐优于运动饮食疗法(P<0.05)。在体重减轻方面,针刺治疗优于穴位埋线疗法(P<0.05);穴位埋线+运动饮食疗法、穴位埋线+中药、穴位埋线+艾灸、穴位埋线+拔罐优于针刺和电针治疗(P<0.05);穴位埋线+运动饮食疗法、穴位埋线+中药、穴位埋线+艾灸优于中药治疗(P<0.05);穴位埋线、穴位埋线+针刺、穴位埋线+运动饮食疗法、穴位埋线+中药、穴位埋线+艾灸、穴位埋线+拔罐优于运动饮食疗法(P<0.05)。在降低体质指数(BMI)方面,穴位埋线+艾灸和穴位埋线+拔罐比针刺治疗更明显(P<0.05);穴位埋线+艾灸比电针治疗更明显(P<0.05)。

结论

穴位埋线及其与其他疗法的联合应用是治疗单纯性肥胖症的首选方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33e0/9152380/819f9de3f1af/ECAM2022-6408073.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验