Suppr超能文献

磁化水的抗菌活性评价及其与 0.2%洗必泰在 3 周龄幼儿中的比较。

Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of Magnetized Water and Its Comparison with Chlorhexidine 0.2% in Young Children for 3 Weeks.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Nalanda Medical College and Hospital, Bihar, India.

Medical Officer, Government of Bihar, India.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Jan 1;23(1):83-88.

Abstract

AIM

The goal of this study was to compare the effects of magnetized water and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash on gingivitis and plaque prevention in children aged 12-15 years for a period of 21 days.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 24 youngsters between the ages of 12 and 15 years were chosen. A computer-generated random number sequence was used to split the research participants into two groups. Magnetized water was utilized as a mouthrinse in Category 1, while 0.2% chlorhexidine was employed in Category 2. Water purified with reverse osmosis was stored in glass bottles, which were then put near the magnets to create magnetic water. The magnets had 1000 Gauss power. The bottles were put for a period of 24 hours. The youngsters were given 140 mL of mouthrinse. These mouthrinses were to be used at home, they were told. The Gilmore Turesky adaptation of Quigley Hein's plaque index was used to assess the plaque whereas the gingival index recommended by Loe and Sillness was utilized to assess the gingiva. The plaque index and gingival index were analyzed at baseline, 14 days, and 21 days, as well as history and examination for adverse effects such as bitter taste, brownish discoloration, and so on, were recorded. The trial lasted 21 days with a follow-up period of another 21 days.

RESULTS

Both magnetic water and chlorhexidine were similarly successful in managing periodontal and gingival infections; however, magnetized water had less side effects, such as a bitter metallic taste and brown stains.

CONCLUSION

Because of its well-accepted flavor, softer nature, and lower frequency of brown stains, magnetized water can be a safer and more acceptable alternative to chlorhexidine mouthwashes, especially in youngsters.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The use of chlorhexidine as a mouthrinse in the oral cavity has been linked to side effects. These side effects are mostly localized, such as brownish discoloration of teeth, alterations in taste perception, and erosion of the oral mucosa. As chlorhexidine has such negative side effects, it was necessary to do research, particularly in children, to identify a replacement that is similarly efficient against germs but does not have these side effects. Water treated with a magnetic field (magnetized water) was compared with chlorhexidine in the current study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较磁化水和 0.2%洗必泰漱口液对 12-15 岁儿童牙龈炎和菌斑预防的作用,为期 21 天。

材料和方法

选择了 24 名 12-15 岁的青少年。使用计算机生成的随机数序列将研究参与者分为两组。第一组使用磁化水漱口,第二组使用 0.2%洗必泰漱口。反渗透净化水储存在玻璃瓶中,然后放置在磁铁附近以制成磁化水。磁铁的磁场强度为 1000 高斯。瓶子放置 24 小时。青少年们被给予 140 毫升的漱口液。告诉他们这些漱口液可以在家里使用。使用吉尔莫-图雷斯基(Gilmore Turesky)改良的奎格利-海因(Quigley Hein)菌斑指数评估菌斑,使用洛伊和西伦斯(Loe and Sillness)推荐的牙龈指数评估牙龈。在基线、14 天和 21 天评估菌斑指数和牙龈指数,并记录病史和检查是否有苦味、褐色变色等不良反应。试验持续 21 天,随后进行为期 21 天的随访。

结果

磁化水和洗必泰在控制牙周和牙龈感染方面同样有效;然而,磁化水的副作用较小,如苦味和褐色污渍。

结论

由于磁化水口感良好、性质温和、褐色污渍较少,因此作为洗必泰漱口液的替代品更为安全、更易被接受,尤其是在青少年中。

临床意义

氯己定作为口腔漱口液的使用与副作用有关。这些副作用主要是局部的,如牙齿变色、味觉改变和口腔黏膜侵蚀。由于氯己定有这些负面副作用,因此有必要进行研究,特别是在儿童中,寻找一种同样能有效杀菌但没有这些副作用的替代品。本研究将磁场处理水(磁化水)与氯己定进行了比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验