• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行主动脉瓣置换术患者的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值:PARTNER 试验和注册研究。

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratios in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The PARTNER Trials and Registries.

机构信息

Clinical Trials Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York NY.

Division of Cardiology NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center New York NY.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 7;11(11):e024091. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024091. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.121.024091
PMID:35656983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9238729/
Abstract

Background The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a marker of systemic inflammation has been associated with worse prognosis in several chronic disease states, including heart failure. However, few data exist on the prognostic impact of elevated baseline NLR or change in NLR levels during follow-up in patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR or SAVR) for aortic stenosis. Methods and Results NLR was available in 5881 patients with severe aortic stenosis receiving TAVR or SAVR in PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) I, II, and S3 trials/registries (median [Q1, Q3] NLR, 3.30 [2.40, 4.90]); mean NLR, 4.10; range, 0.5-24.9) and was evaluated as continuous variable and categorical tertiles (low: NLR ≤2.70, n=1963; intermediate: NLR 2.70-4.20, n=1958; high: NLR ≥4.20, n=1960). No patients had known baseline infection. High baseline NLR was associated with increased risk of death or rehospitalization at 3 years (58.4% versus 41.0%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.18-1.63; <0.0001) compared with those with low NLR, irrespective of treatment modality. In both patients treated with TAVR and patients treated with SAVR, NLR decreased between baseline and 2 years. A 1-unit observed decrease in NLR between baseline and 1 year was associated with lower risk of death or rehospitalization between 1 year and 3 years (aHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.89; <0.0001). Conclusions Elevated baseline NLR was independently associated with increased subsequent mortality and rehospitalization after TAVR or SAVR. The observed decrease in NLR after TAVR or SAVR was associated with improved outcomes. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00530894, NCT0134313, NCT02184442, NCT03225001, NCT0322141.

摘要

背景 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)作为全身炎症的标志物,与心力衰竭等多种慢性疾病状态的预后不良有关。然而,在接受经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR 或 SAVR)治疗的主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,关于基线 NLR 升高或随访期间 NLR 水平变化的预后影响的数据很少。

方法和结果 PARTNER(经导管主动脉瓣置换术)I、II 和 S3 试验/登记处纳入了 5881 例严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者,接受了 TAVR 或 SAVR 治疗(NLR 中位数[Q1,Q3],3.30[2.40,4.90];平均 NLR,4.10;范围,0.5-24.9),并将其作为连续变量和三分位数进行评估(低:NLR≤2.70,n=1963;中:NLR 2.70-4.20,n=1958;高:NLR≥4.20,n=1960)。所有患者均无已知的基线感染。高基线 NLR 与 3 年时死亡或再住院风险增加相关(58.4%比 41.0%;调整后的危险比[aHR],1.39;95%CI,1.18-1.63;<0.0001),与 NLR 较低的患者相比,无论治疗方式如何。在接受 TAVR 和 SAVR 治疗的患者中,NLR 均从基线水平下降至 2 年。与基线相比,1 年内 NLR 观察到的 1 个单位下降与 1 年至 3 年期间的死亡或再住院风险降低相关(aHR,0.86;95%CI,0.82-0.89;<0.0001)。

结论 基线 NLR 升高与 TAVR 或 SAVR 后死亡率和再住院率增加独立相关。TAVR 或 SAVR 后 NLR 的观察下降与结局改善相关。注册网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT00530894、NCT0134313、NCT02184442、NCT03225001、NCT0322141。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b18/9238729/58ba08b92af6/JAH3-11-e024091-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b18/9238729/60873489d76b/JAH3-11-e024091-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b18/9238729/58ba08b92af6/JAH3-11-e024091-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b18/9238729/60873489d76b/JAH3-11-e024091-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b18/9238729/58ba08b92af6/JAH3-11-e024091-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratios in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The PARTNER Trials and Registries.行主动脉瓣置换术患者的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值:PARTNER 试验和注册研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 7;11(11):e024091. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024091. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis After TAVR and SAVR: Insights From the PARTNER Trials.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)和外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)后人工瓣膜心内膜炎:来自 PARTNER 试验的见解。
Circulation. 2019 Dec 10;140(24):1984-1994. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041399. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Impact of Flow on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术和外科主动脉瓣置换术后血流对人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Aug;14(8):e012364. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012364. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
4
Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: The PARTNER 3 Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在低危患者中的超声心动图结果:PARTNER 3 试验。
Circulation. 2020 May 12;141(19):1527-1537. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044574. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Risk.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的成本效果分析。
Circulation. 2019 Feb 12;139(7):877-888. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035236.
6
Impact of preoperative moderate/severe mitral regurgitation on 2-year outcome after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: insight from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve (PARTNER) Trial Cohort A.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术 2 年后中重度二尖瓣反流对预后的影响:来自经导管主动脉瓣置换术(PARTNER)试验队列 A 的观察。
Circulation. 2013 Dec 24;128(25):2776-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003885. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
7
Outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: results from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial (cohort A).经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗高危主动脉瓣狭窄合并左心室功能不全患者的疗效:主动脉经导管瓣膜置入(PARTNER)试验(A队列)结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(6):604-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000650. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
8
Time-of-Day and Clinical Outcomes After Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the PARTNER Trials.手术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的时间和临床结局:来自 PARTNER 试验的见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Jan;15(1):e007948. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.007948. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
9
Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.高危手术患者中经导管主动脉瓣自膨胀置换术与外科瓣膜置换术的比较:一项关于超声心动图变化及风险预测的研究
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003426.
10
Incidence and sequelae of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: a PARTNER trial cohort--a analysis.高危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管与外科瓣膜置换术中人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的发生率及后遗症:一项PARTNER试验队列分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 30;64(13):1323-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1195.

引用本文的文献

1
Preprocedural neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: A novel predictor of permanent pacemaker implantation in self-expandable vs balloon-expandable valve cohorts following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值:经导管主动脉瓣植入术后自膨胀式与球囊扩张式瓣膜队列中永久起搏器植入的新型预测指标。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Mar 11;6(6):766-780. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.03.003. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Biomarkers of Inflammation and Association with Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Risk Stratification and Outcome in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者炎症生物标志物及其与心血管磁共振成像在风险分层和预后评估中的关联
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 7;14(7):2512. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072512.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Frailty Is Intertwined With Heart Failure: Mechanisms, Prevalence, Prognosis, Assessment, and Management.衰弱与心力衰竭交织:机制、流行率、预后、评估和管理。
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Dec;7(12):1001-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.10.005.
2
Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibition Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 6;74(5):631-641. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.055.
3
The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in heart failure: a comprehensive review.心力衰竭中的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值:一项综述
The Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio on Mortality in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者死亡率的预后价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 Jan 24;17(1):e77909. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77909. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Predictive Value of Monocyte-To-Lymphocyte Ratio in Differentiating Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis-A Retrospective Analysis.单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值在鉴别重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者射血分数降低的心力衰竭中的预测价值——一项回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 19;13(20):6249. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206249.
5
The Prognostic Role of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocytes Ratio in the Most Frequent Cardiovascular Diseases: An Update.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在最常见心血管疾病中的预后作用:最新进展
Life (Basel). 2024 Aug 7;14(8):985. doi: 10.3390/life14080985.
6
Effect of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio on Post-TAVR Mortality and Periprocedural Pulmonary Hypertension.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对 TAVR 术后死亡率和围手术期肺动脉高压的影响。
J Interv Cardiol. 2024 Feb 20;2024:4512655. doi: 10.1155/2024/4512655. eCollection 2024.
7
Association between uric acid and cardiac outcomes mediated by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension.尿酸通过中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与左心室舒张功能障碍和肺动脉高压患者心功能结局的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 2;14(1):2751. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53077-1.
8
A Novel Score to Predict One-Year Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, Naples Prognostic Score.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后一年死亡率的预测新评分:那不勒斯预后评分。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 15;59(9):1666. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091666.
9
The Impact of Monocyte to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio on All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者单核细胞与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值对全因死亡率和心血管死亡率的影响
J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 13;13(6):989. doi: 10.3390/jpm13060989.
10
Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and efficacy of SGLT2 inhibition with empagliflozin on cardiac remodelling.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的基线水平和恩格列净对心脏重构的 SGLT2 抑制作用的疗效。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Jun;10(3):2127-2133. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14351. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
Rom J Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;57(4):296-314. doi: 10.2478/rjim-2019-0018.
4
Hospital Resource Utilization Before and After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The STS/ACC TVT Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术前后的医院资源利用:STS/ACC TVT 注册研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Mar 19;73(10):1135-1146. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.049.
5
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts heart failure readmissions and outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的心衰再入院情况及预后。
Indian Heart J. 2018 Dec;70 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S313-S318. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
6
Association of Renin-Angiotensin Inhibitor Treatment With Mortality and Heart Failure Readmission in Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.肾素-血管紧张素抑制剂治疗与经导管主动脉瓣置换术后患者死亡率和心力衰竭再入院的关系。
JAMA. 2018 Dec 4;320(21):2231-2241. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18077.
7
Value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of mortality in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在主动脉瓣置换术患者死亡率预测中的价值
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018 Apr;8(2):164-172. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2018.03.01.
8
Impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on clinical outcomes and ventricular remodelling after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: rationale and design of the RASTAVI randomised multicentre study.肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后临床结局及心室重构的影响:RASTAVI随机多中心研究的原理与设计
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 13;8(2):e020255. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020255.
9
Immune mechanisms in heart failure.心力衰竭中的免疫机制。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;19(11):1379-1389. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.942. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
10
Inflammation - Cause or Consequence of Heart Failure or Both?炎症——是心力衰竭的原因、后果还是两者皆是?
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2017 Aug;14(4):251-265. doi: 10.1007/s11897-017-0337-9.