Suppr超能文献

关于新冠病毒感染与新冠病毒疫苗接种所致黏膜皮肤反应的对比性综述

A comparative review on mucocutaneous reactions caused by Covid-19 infection versus Covid-19 vaccination.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Dermatology, University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Dermatology, Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Exp Dermatol. 2022 Aug;31(8):1122-1127. doi: 10.1111/exd.14620. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

Abstract

The prevalence and severity of mucocutaneous manifestations in Covid-19 infection are generally higher than those reported in Covid vaccines. Therefore, comparing the mucocutaneous reactions of the Covid-19 infection and vaccination is necessary to enhance our knowledge about such reactions and guide us to evaluate the risk of infection or vaccination. A thorough literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and EBSCO (LISTA), and 2069 articles were downloaded. After screening, 11 studies remained for the final review. The literature review revealed that the prevalence and severity of postvaccine mucocutaneous adverse reactions have been less common compared to Covid-19 infection. Postvaccine adverse reactions primarily occurred after the first dose administration and such reactions were manageable with antihistamines and corticosteroids administration. This comparative analysis highlights the frequency and potential severity of mucocutaneous reactions due to Covid-19 infection and Covid-19 vaccination. It also affirmed that potentially critical (serious) mucocutaneous reactions are more likely to occur in Covid-19 infection compared to Covid vaccination. Moreover, postvaccine reactions predominantly happened after the first dose and were reported to be non-life-threatening, self-manageable and with a lower incidence of potentially critical events. It was also concluded that the incidence of mucocutaneous reactions decreased in the following doses. Hence, given the low rate of such reactions following Covid-19 vaccination, vaccines have a lower risk of mucocutaneous reactions occurrence than Covid-19 infection. Further, due to the limited number of studies, we recommend that large-scale trials evaluate such reactions comparing various types of Covid-19 vaccines in healthy individuals and those with autoimmune skin disorders.

摘要

新冠病毒感染的黏膜皮肤表现的发生率和严重程度普遍高于新冠疫苗报告的水平。因此,比较新冠病毒感染和疫苗接种的黏膜皮肤反应对于增强我们对这些反应的认识并指导我们评估感染或接种疫苗的风险是必要的。在 PubMed、Google Scholar 和 EBSCO(LISTA)上进行了全面的文献检索,下载了 2069 篇文章。经过筛选,有 11 项研究被纳入最终审查。文献回顾显示,与新冠病毒感染相比,疫苗接种后的黏膜皮肤不良反应的发生率和严重程度较低。疫苗接种后的不良反应主要发生在第一剂后,可通过给予抗组胺药和皮质类固醇来管理。这项比较分析突出了由于新冠病毒感染和新冠病毒疫苗接种而导致的黏膜皮肤反应的频率和潜在严重程度。它还证实,与新冠病毒疫苗接种相比,新冠病毒感染更有可能发生潜在严重(严重)的黏膜皮肤反应。此外,疫苗接种后反应主要发生在第一剂后,且报告为非危及生命、可自我管理,且潜在严重事件的发生率较低。还得出结论,随着剂量的增加,黏膜皮肤反应的发生率降低。因此,鉴于新冠病毒疫苗接种后黏膜皮肤反应的发生率较低,与新冠病毒感染相比,疫苗接种发生黏膜皮肤反应的风险较低。此外,由于研究数量有限,我们建议在健康个体和自身免疫性皮肤疾病患者中,开展大规模试验来评估比较各种类型的新冠病毒疫苗的此类反应。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验