• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[健康促进学校在增进健康公平方面的作用]

[The role of health promoting schools for increasing health equity].

作者信息

Moor Irene, Bieber Janis, Niederschuh Liska, Winter Kristina

机构信息

Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112, Halle/Saale, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jul;65(7-8):749-757. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03551-w. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-022-03551-w
PMID:35657386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9164180/
Abstract

Socioeconomic health inequalities are a major field of action in public health and tackling them is one of its main goals. However, there has been little success in reducing these health inequalities. This points to a large research deficit. Inequalities in health are already evident in childhood and adolescence, showing that those with a low socioeconomic background have more risk factors and at the same time fewer resources than their socially more privileged peers. Although health promotion aims at achieving equity in health, interventions rarely consider the socioeconomic status and can therefore provide only little evidence regarding socioeconomically differentiated intervention effects. How can we ensure that all children and young people have equal chances to grow up healthy?In order to come closer to answering this question, it is the aim of this article to give an overview of health inequalities in childhood and adolescence and to highlight the contribution of school and school-based health promotion interventions for tackling health inequalities and increasing equity in health. School is not only a place where adolescents can always be reached, regardless of their socioeconomic background, it has the potential to both exacerbate and reduce health inequalities.

摘要

社会经济健康不平等是公共卫生领域的一个主要行动领域,解决这些不平等问题是其主要目标之一。然而,在减少这些健康不平等方面成效甚微。这表明存在很大的研究不足。健康不平等在儿童期和青少年期就已很明显,这表明社会经济背景较低的儿童比社会地位更优越的同龄人有更多风险因素,同时资源更少。尽管健康促进旨在实现健康公平,但干预措施很少考虑社会经济地位,因此关于社会经济差异干预效果的证据很少。我们如何确保所有儿童和年轻人都有平等的机会健康成长?为了更接近回答这个问题,本文旨在概述儿童期和青少年期的健康不平等,并强调学校及基于学校的健康促进干预措施在解决健康不平等和增强健康公平方面的作用。学校不仅是一个无论青少年社会经济背景如何都能接触到他们的场所,它既有可能加剧也有可能减少健康不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ec/9232431/dece5caa2097/103_2022_3551_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ec/9232431/dece5caa2097/103_2022_3551_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ec/9232431/dece5caa2097/103_2022_3551_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
[The role of health promoting schools for increasing health equity].[健康促进学校在增进健康公平方面的作用]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jul;65(7-8):749-757. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03551-w. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Socioeconomic inequalities and the equity impact of population-level interventions for adolescent health: an overview of systematic reviews.社会经济不平等与人群干预对青少年健康的公平影响:系统综述概述。
Public Health. 2020 Mar;180:154-162. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.11.008. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
Do school-based physical activity interventions increase or reduce inequalities in health?学校为基础的身体活动干预是否增加或减少健康方面的不平等?
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jul;112:80-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.032. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
4
The Impact of Age on Income-Related Health Status Inequalities from Birth to Adolescence: A Systematic Review with Cross-Country Comparisons.从出生到青春期,年龄对收入相关健康状况不平等的影响:系统评价与跨国比较。
J Pediatr. 2018 Dec;203:380-390.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.030. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
5
[Social inequalities in adolescent smoking: A cross-national perspective of the role of individual and macro-structural factors].青少年吸烟中的社会不平等:关于个体因素和宏观结构因素作用的跨国视角
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2016 Feb;59(2):206-16. doi: 10.1007/s00103-015-2280-9.
6
A systematic review of the effectiveness of individual, community and societal level interventions at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in obesity amongst children.一项关于个体、社区和社会层面干预措施在减少儿童肥胖方面社会经济不平等有效性的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 11;14:834. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-834.
7
Preventing socioeconomic inequalities in health behaviour in adolescents in Europe: background, design and methods of project TEENAGE.预防欧洲青少年健康行为中的社会经济不平等:TEENAGE项目的背景、设计与方法
BMC Public Health. 2009 May 8;9:125. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-125.
8
Equity-Specific Effects of Interventions to Promote Physical Activity among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Development of a Collaborative Equity-Specific Re-Analysis Strategy.促进中老年人体力活动干预措施的公平性影响:制定合作性公平性再分析策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 1;16(17):3195. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173195.
9
[Type of school, social capital and subjective health in adolescence].[青少年时期的学校类型、社会资本与主观健康状况]
Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Nov;74(11):691-701. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285860. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
10
An evaluation of equity and equality in physical activity policies in four European countries.对四个欧洲国家体育活动政策中的公平性和平等性的评估。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Nov 24;15(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0481-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring meso- and macro-level contextual factors associated with inequalities in program adoption during statewide scale-up of TransformUs Primary, a whole-school physical activity intervention.在全州范围内推广“转变我们的小学”(一项全校性体育活动干预措施)期间,探索与项目采用不平等现象相关的中观和宏观层面背景因素。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Aug 18;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01810-y.
2
[Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of health promotion in daycare centers and elementary schools based on four selected projects].[基于四个选定项目的日托中心和小学健康促进实施的促进因素和障碍]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Sep;67(9):1021-1030. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03935-0. Epub 2024 Aug 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of contextual and compositional characteristics of schools for health inequalities in childhood and adolescence: a scoping review.学校在儿童和青少年时期健康不平等中的作用:情境和构成特征的影响:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e052925. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052925.
2
Creating health promoting schools will improve population health and help reduce inequalities.创建健康促进学校将改善人群健康并有助于减少不平等现象。
BMJ. 2021 May 24;373:n1290. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1290.
3
School as ideal setting to promote health and wellbeing among young people.
学校是促进年轻人健康和幸福的理想场所。
Health Promot Perspect. 2020 Nov 7;10(4):316-324. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2020.50. eCollection 2020.
4
Socioeconomic inequalities and the equity impact of population-level interventions for adolescent health: an overview of systematic reviews.社会经济不平等与人群干预对青少年健康的公平影响:系统综述概述。
Public Health. 2020 Mar;180:154-162. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.11.008. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
5
Effectiveness of Community-Based Health Promotion Interventions in Urban Areas: A Systematic Review.社区健康促进干预在城市地区的效果:系统评价。
J Community Health. 2020 Apr;45(2):419-434. doi: 10.1007/s10900-019-00733-7.
6
[Differences in subjective health, mental health, and health behavior among 11- to 17-year-olds at secondary schools in Germany : Results of the German health interview and examination survey for children and adolescents: first follow-up (KiGGS Wave 1)].德国中学11至17岁学生的主观健康、心理健康及健康行为差异:德国儿童和青少年健康访谈与检查调查结果:首次随访(KiGGS第一轮)
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Apr;61(4):374-384. doi: 10.1007/s00103-018-2704-4.
7
[Trends in educational inequalities in smoking among adolescents in Germany : Evidence from four population-based studies].[德国青少年吸烟教育不平等趋势:四项基于人群研究的证据]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Jan;61(1):7-19. doi: 10.1007/s00103-017-2636-4.
8
Explaining socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health: a systematic review of the relative contribution of material, psychosocial and behavioural factors.解释自评健康中的社会经济不平等现象:物质、心理社会和行为因素相对贡献的系统评价。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Jun;71(6):565-575. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207589. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing.我们的未来:《柳叶刀》青少年健康与福祉委员会
Lancet. 2016 Jun 11;387(10036):2423-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00579-1. Epub 2016 May 9.
10
Implementing health promotion programmes in schools: a realist systematic review of research and experience in the United Kingdom.在学校实施健康促进项目:对英国研究与经验的现实主义系统评价
Implement Sci. 2015 Oct 28;10:149. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0338-6.