• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[基于四个选定项目的日托中心和小学健康促进实施的促进因素和障碍]

[Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of health promotion in daycare centers and elementary schools based on four selected projects].

作者信息

Scheffler Anna, Klocker Laura, Puls Angelika, Hummers Eva, Demmer Iris

机构信息

Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.

Gesundheitsregion Göttingen/Südniedersachsen, Göttingen, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Sep;67(9):1021-1030. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03935-0. Epub 2024 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-024-03935-0
PMID:39164394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11349828/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health promotion (HP) is a complex, politically required task. The quality of implementation correlates with the effectiveness of health promotion initiatives. Successful implementation requires consideration of contextual conditions, which tend to be neglected in effectiveness studies. The aim is to identify success factors and obstacles to the implementation of HP in daycare centers and elementary schools based on 4 projects (Fit fürs Leben, fit für pisa +, Buchprojekt Sonnige Traurigtage, and The Daily Mile) in the Göttingen/South Lower Saxony region. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are assumed to be relevant for the implementation of these projects.

METHODS

In 24 semi-structured interviews and 2 focus group discussions between August 2021 and March 2022, practitioners were asked about the implementation of the four projects in their areas of activity. After transcription, the interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research supported the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 22 groups of factors were identified, on the basis of which 22 recommendations for action for GF implementation were formulated. Success factors at the individual and intervention level were at the forefront. The COVID-19 pandemic had a positive impact on the importance of HP, even though its feasibility was hampered.

DISCUSSION

Numerous findings on the implementation of HP in children's living environments were confirmed by the study. The high significance of the individual factors is striking, which could be due to the survey of interviewees being familiar with the projects. The study results contribute to the further development of implementation strategies in HP.

摘要

背景

健康促进是一项复杂的、政治上要求的任务。实施质量与健康促进举措的有效性相关。成功实施需要考虑背景条件,而这些条件在有效性研究中往往被忽视。目的是基于哥廷根/下萨克森南部地区的4个项目(“健康生活”、“适合比萨+”、“阳光忧郁日图书项目”和“每日一英里”),确定日托中心和小学实施健康促进的成功因素和障碍。假定新冠疫情的影响与这些项目的实施相关。

方法

在2021年8月至2022年3月期间进行的24次半结构化访谈和2次焦点小组讨论中,询问了从业者在其活动领域中这四个项目的实施情况。转录后,使用定性内容分析法对访谈进行分析。实施研究综合框架为分析提供了支持。

结果

共确定了22组因素,并在此基础上制定了实施健康促进的22条行动建议。个人和干预层面的成功因素最为突出。尽管新冠疫情阻碍了健康促进的可行性,但对其重要性产生了积极影响。

讨论

该研究证实了关于在儿童生活环境中实施健康促进的众多发现。个人因素的高度重要性令人瞩目,这可能是由于受访者熟悉这些项目的调查所致。研究结果有助于健康促进实施策略的进一步发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b9/11349828/526ace71f1f3/103_2024_3935_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b9/11349828/41d68b1bfb57/103_2024_3935_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b9/11349828/526ace71f1f3/103_2024_3935_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b9/11349828/41d68b1bfb57/103_2024_3935_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b9/11349828/526ace71f1f3/103_2024_3935_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
[Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of health promotion in daycare centers and elementary schools based on four selected projects].[基于四个选定项目的日托中心和小学健康促进实施的促进因素和障碍]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Sep;67(9):1021-1030. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03935-0. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
2
[School health promotion in pandemic times. Results of the COVID-HL school principal study].[大流行时期的学校健康促进。COVID-HL 学校校长研究结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jul;65(7-8):758-767. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03535-w. Epub 2022 May 6.
3
Perspectives of primary school teachers on the capacity of schools to support post-pandemic health needs emerging among school-age children.小学教师对学校支持学龄儿童出现的后疫情健康需求的能力的看法。
Child Care Health Dev. 2024 Jul;50(4):e13285. doi: 10.1111/cch.13285.
4
School-based obesity prevention for busy low-income families-Organisational and personal barriers and facilitators to implementation.以学校为基础的肥胖预防措施对忙碌的低收入家庭的实施:组织和个人障碍及促进因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 5;14(11):e0224512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224512. eCollection 2019.
5
Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of physical activity policies in elementary schools from the perspective of principals: An application of the consolidated framework for implementation research-A cross-sectional study.从校长视角出发,探讨小学采纳身体活动政策的障碍和促进因素:实施研究综合框架的应用——一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;11:935292. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.935292. eCollection 2023.
6
Qualitative multi-stakeholder evaluation of the adoption, implementation and sustainment of the school-based dietary intervention "Jump-in".基于利益相关者的定性评价:学校饮食干预“Jump-in”的采纳、实施和持续情况。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 17;24(1):1337. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18814-1.
7
Parents' experiences of participating in the Healthy School Start Plus programme - a qualitative study.家长参与健康学校启动加项目的体验 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 4;23(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15552-8.
8
One size does not fit all-qualitative process evaluation of the Healthy School Start parental support programme to prevent overweight and obesity among children in disadvantaged areas in Sweden.一刀切并不适用于所有情况——对瑞典健康学校起步家长支持项目进行定性过程评估,以预防贫困地区儿童超重和肥胖。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 14;16:37. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2701-1.
9
Implementation evaluation of an Irish secondary-level whole school programme: a qualitative inquiry.爱尔兰中学整体学校计划的实施评估:一项定性研究。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Oct 1;37(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac131.
10
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.学校为遏制新冠疫情而采取的措施:一项范围综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 17;12(12):CD013812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013812.

引用本文的文献

1
[Status, classification, and potential of implementation research: an inventory for public health in Germany].[实施研究的现状、分类及实施潜力:德国公共卫生领域清单]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04077-7.

本文引用的文献

1
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
2
[Perspective Paper "Future Prevention Research" - Current and Future Coordinated Research on Prevention and Health Promotion].[观点论文《未来预防研究》——当前及未来预防与健康促进的协同研究]
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Apr;85(4):388-394. doi: 10.1055/a-1816-3398. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
3
[The role of health promoting schools for increasing health equity].
[健康促进学校在增进健康公平方面的作用]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jul;65(7-8):749-757. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03551-w. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
4
[School health promotion in pandemic times. Results of the COVID-HL school principal study].[大流行时期的学校健康促进。COVID-HL 学校校长研究结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jul;65(7-8):758-767. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03535-w. Epub 2022 May 6.
5
[Quality management and development in primary prevention and health promotion: status, challenges, and perspectives].[初级预防与健康促进中的质量管理与发展:现状、挑战与展望]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Mar;65(3):310-318. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03494-2. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
6
Understanding key implementation determinants for a school-based universal prevention intervention: a qualitative study.理解基于学校的普遍预防干预措施的关键实施决定因素:一项定性研究。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Mar 17;12(3):411-422. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab162.
7
[Mental health and psychological burden of children and adolescents during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic-results of the COPSY study].[新冠疫情第一波期间儿童和青少年的心理健康与心理负担——COPSY研究结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Dec;64(12):1512-1521. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03291-3. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
8
Lifestyle and Body Weight Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Children: Increasing Disparity.新冠疫情对儿童生活方式和体重的影响:差距日益扩大
Ann Nutr Metab. 2021;77(1):1-3. doi: 10.1159/000514186. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
9
[Understanding through qualitative methods - the contribution of interpretative social research to health reporting].[通过定性方法进行理解——诠释性社会研究对健康报道的贡献]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Sep;63(9):1126-1133. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03209-5.
10
The sustainability of public health interventions in schools: a systematic review.学校公共卫生干预措施的可持续性:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2020 Jan 6;15(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0961-8.