• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种预测整体食物偏好的方法。

A method to predict overall food preferences.

机构信息

Department of Plant, Food and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada.

School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0268520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268520. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0268520
PMID:35657828
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9165852/
Abstract

Most natural ecosystems contain animals feeding on many different types of food, but it is difficult to predict what will be eaten when food availabilities change. We present a method that estimates food preference over many study sites, even when number of food types vary widely from site to site. Sampling variation is estimated using bootstrapping. We test the precision and accuracy of this method using computer simulations that show the effects of overall number of food types, number of sites, and proportion of missing prey items per site. Accuracy is greater with fewer missing prey types, more prey types and more sites, and is affected by the number of sites more than the number of prey types. We present a case study using lion (Panthera leo) feeding data and show that preference vs prey size follows a bell-curve. Using just two estimated parameters, this curve can be used as a general way to describe predator feeding patterns. Our method can be used to: test hypotheses about what factors affect prey selection, predict preferences in new sites, and estimate overall prey consumed in new sites.

摘要

大多数自然生态系统都包含以多种不同类型食物为食的动物,但很难预测当食物可利用性发生变化时会吃什么。我们提出了一种方法,可以在许多研究地点估计食物偏好,即使食物类型的数量在不同地点差异很大。使用自举法估计抽样变异。我们使用计算机模拟测试了这种方法的精度和准确性,这些模拟显示了总体食物类型数量、地点数量以及每个地点缺少猎物数量的比例的影响。准确性随着缺少的猎物类型、猎物类型和地点数量的减少而增加,并且受地点数量的影响大于猎物类型的数量。我们使用狮子( Panthera leo )的摄食数据进行了案例研究,结果表明,摄食偏好与猎物大小呈钟形曲线。使用仅两个估计参数,该曲线可以用作描述捕食者摄食模式的一般方法。我们的方法可用于:检验影响猎物选择的因素的假设,预测新地点的偏好,以及估计新地点的总猎物消耗量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f755/9165852/d91c0c48095b/pone.0268520.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f755/9165852/17e30dc4d3cd/pone.0268520.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f755/9165852/d78ee8ccd4e3/pone.0268520.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f755/9165852/f17142ecd39f/pone.0268520.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f755/9165852/07d7e426e6c6/pone.0268520.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f755/9165852/d91c0c48095b/pone.0268520.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f755/9165852/17e30dc4d3cd/pone.0268520.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f755/9165852/d78ee8ccd4e3/pone.0268520.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f755/9165852/f17142ecd39f/pone.0268520.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f755/9165852/07d7e426e6c6/pone.0268520.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f755/9165852/d91c0c48095b/pone.0268520.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A method to predict overall food preferences.一种预测整体食物偏好的方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0268520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268520. eCollection 2022.
2
Predator-prey size relationships in an African large-mammal food web.非洲大型哺乳动物食物网中的捕食者与猎物大小关系。
J Anim Ecol. 2008 Jan;77(1):173-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01314.x.
3
Do lions Panthera leo actively select prey or do prey preferences simply reflect chance responses via evolutionary adaptations to optimal foraging?狮子 Panthera leo 是否主动选择猎物,或者猎物偏好是否仅仅反映了通过进化适应最佳觅食的机会反应?
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023607. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
4
Spatially explicit density and its determinants for Asiatic lions in the Gir forests.吉尔国家公园亚洲狮的空间密度及其决定因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 19;15(2):e0228374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228374. eCollection 2020.
5
Interspecific prey neighborhoods shape risk of predation in a savanna ecosystem.种间猎物邻域塑造了热带稀树草原生态系统中的捕食风险。
Ecology. 2019 Jul;100(7):e02698. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2698. Epub 2019 May 2.
6
Zebra diel migrations reduce encounter risk with lions at night.斑马的昼夜迁徙减少了夜间与狮子遭遇的风险。
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Jan;88(1):92-101. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12910. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
7
Can an herbivore affect where a top predator kills its prey by modifying woody vegetation structure?草食动物能否通过改变木本植被结构影响顶级捕食者杀死猎物的地点?
Oecologia. 2020 Mar;192(3):779-789. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04617-9. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
8
Group formation stabilizes predator-prey dynamics.群体形成稳定了捕食者 - 猎物动态。
Nature. 2007 Oct 25;449(7165):1041-3. doi: 10.1038/nature06177.
9
Effects of Vegetation Structure on the Location of Lion Kill Sites in African Thicket.植被结构对非洲灌木丛中狮子捕杀地点位置的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0149098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149098. eCollection 2016.
10
Seasonal diet and prey preference of the African lion in a waterhole-driven semi-arid savanna.季节性饮食和水源驱动的半干旱稀树草原中非洲狮的捕食偏好。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055182. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Diet selection in the Coyote .郊狼的饮食选择
J Mammal. 2023 Nov 4;104(6):1338-1352. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyad094. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The sampling characteristics of electivity indices.选择性指数的抽样特征。
Oecologia. 1982 Jan;52(1):22-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00349007.
2
Quantitative measurement of food selection : A modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev's electivity index.食物选择的定量测量:饲料比例和伊夫列夫选择性指数的一种改进方法。
Oecologia. 1974 Dec;14(4):413-417. doi: 10.1007/BF00384581.
3
Toward accurate and precise estimates of lion density.迈向对狮子密度的准确和精确估计。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Aug;31(4):934-943. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12878. Epub 2017 May 29.
4
Predator-dependent functional response in wolves: from food limitation to surplus killing.狼中依赖捕食者的功能反应:从食物限制到过度捕杀。
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jan;84(1):102-12. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12280. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
5
Prey preferences of the snow leopard (Panthera uncia): regional diet specificity holds global significance for conservation.雪豹(Panthera uncia)的猎物偏好:区域饮食特异性对保护具有全球意义。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 12;9(2):e88349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088349. eCollection 2014.
6
Body masses, functional responses and predator-prey stability.体质量、功能反应和捕食者-猎物稳定性。
Ecol Lett. 2013 Sep;16(9):1126-34. doi: 10.1111/ele.12147. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
7
Seasonal diet and prey preference of the African lion in a waterhole-driven semi-arid savanna.季节性饮食和水源驱动的半干旱稀树草原中非洲狮的捕食偏好。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055182. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
8
Learning predator promotes coexistence of prey species in host-parasitoid systems.学习型捕食者促进宿主-寄生系统中猎物物种的共存。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Mar 27;109(13):5116-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115133109. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
9
Animal foraging: past, present and future.动物觅食:过去、现在和未来。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1997 Aug;12(9):360-4. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01097-5.
10
Diet shifts and food selection of perch Perca fluviatilis and roach Rutilus rutilus in humic lakes of varying water colour.不同水色腐殖质湖泊中欧鲈和斜齿鳊食性转变和食物选择
J Fish Biol. 2010 Jul;77(1):241-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02682.x.