Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
J Am Coll Health. 2024 Jul;72(5):1419-1427. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2077636. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
This study expands the literature on risk taking among college students by exploring anti-racism action as a form of positive risk taking. 346 Black (64%) and Latinx (36%) college students (85% female) ages 18-27 years ( = 18.75, = 1.31). Participants responded to questionnaires on anti-racism action, health-risk taking, and college functioning. Latent class analysis identified behavioral profiles of risk takers. Indicators of profile membership and associations with college functioning were examined. Three profiles emerged: moderate overall risk taking, high health-risk taking, and high anti-racism action. Personal experience with discrimination was associated with a greater likelihood of health-risk taking. Students in the high anti-racism profile evinced greater educational functioning than those in the high-health risk taking profile. Risky behavior on college campuses is not homogeneous. Specific interventions and support networks are necessary to support students falling within specific risk profiles.
本研究通过探索反种族主义行动作为一种积极的冒险行为,扩展了关于大学生冒险行为的文献。参与者为 346 名黑人(64%)和拉丁裔(36%)大学生(85%为女性),年龄在 18-27 岁之间(均值=18.75,标准差=1.31)。参与者回答了关于反种族主义行动、健康风险行为和大学生功能的问卷。潜在类别分析确定了风险承担者的行为特征。检查了特征成员的指标和与大学生功能的关联。出现了三种特征:总体风险适度、健康风险高和反种族主义行动高。经历过歧视的学生更有可能从事健康风险行为。处于高反种族主义特征的学生比处于高健康风险特征的学生表现出更好的教育功能。大学校园的危险行为并不单一。需要特定的干预措施和支持网络来支持属于特定风险特征的学生。